I Glauche1, R Lorenz, D Hasenclever, I Roeder. 1. Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. ingmar.glauche@imise.uni-leipzig.de
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The analysis of individual cell fates within a population of stem and progenitor cells is still a major experimental challenge in stem cell biology. However, new monitoring techniques, such as high-resolution time-lapse video microscopy, facilitate tracking and quantitative analysis of single cells and their progeny. Information on cellular development, divisional history and differentiation are naturally comprised into a pedigree-like structure, denoted as cellular genealogy. To extract reliable information concerning effecting variables and control mechanisms underlying cell fate decisions, it is necessary to analyse a large number of cellular genealogies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Here, we propose a set of statistical measures that are specifically tailored for the analysis of cellular genealogies. These measures address the degree and symmetry of cellular expansion, as well as occurrence and correlation of characteristic events such as cell death. Furthermore, we discuss two different methods for reconstruction of lineage fate decisions and show their impact on the interpretation of asymmetric developments. In order to illustrate these techniques, and to circumvent the present shortage of available experimental data, we obtain cellular genealogies from a single-cell-based mathematical model of haematopoietic stem cell organization. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Based on statistical analysis of cellular genealogies, we conclude that effects of external variables, such as growth conditions, are imprinted in their topology. Moreover, we demonstrate that it is essential to analyse timing of cell fate-specific changes and of occurrence of cell death events in the divisional context in order to understand the mechanisms of lineage commitment.
OBJECTIVES: The analysis of individual cell fates within a population of stem and progenitor cells is still a major experimental challenge in stem cell biology. However, new monitoring techniques, such as high-resolution time-lapse video microscopy, facilitate tracking and quantitative analysis of single cells and their progeny. Information on cellular development, divisional history and differentiation are naturally comprised into a pedigree-like structure, denoted as cellular genealogy. To extract reliable information concerning effecting variables and control mechanisms underlying cell fate decisions, it is necessary to analyse a large number of cellular genealogies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Here, we propose a set of statistical measures that are specifically tailored for the analysis of cellular genealogies. These measures address the degree and symmetry of cellular expansion, as well as occurrence and correlation of characteristic events such as cell death. Furthermore, we discuss two different methods for reconstruction of lineage fate decisions and show their impact on the interpretation of asymmetric developments. In order to illustrate these techniques, and to circumvent the present shortage of available experimental data, we obtain cellular genealogies from a single-cell-based mathematical model of haematopoietic stem cell organization. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Based on statistical analysis of cellular genealogies, we conclude that effects of external variables, such as growth conditions, are imprinted in their topology. Moreover, we demonstrate that it is essential to analyse timing of cell fate-specific changes and of occurrence of cell death events in the divisional context in order to understand the mechanisms of lineage commitment.
Authors: Shamit Soneji; Sui Huang; Matthew Loose; Ian John Donaldson; Roger Patient; Berthold Göttgens; Tariq Enver; Gillian May Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2007-04-18 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Phillip Karpowicz; Cindi Morshead; Angela Kam; Eric Jervis; John Ramunas; John Ramuns; Vincent Cheng; Derek van der Kooy Journal: J Cell Biol Date: 2005-08-22 Impact factor: 10.539
Authors: Claudiu A Giurumescu; Sukryool Kang; Thomas A Planchon; Eric Betzig; Joshua Bloomekatz; Deborah Yelon; Pamela Cosman; Andrew D Chisholm Journal: Development Date: 2012-10-10 Impact factor: 6.868
Authors: Maria Herberg; Ingmar Glauche; Thomas Zerjatke; Maria Winzi; Frank Buchholz; Ingo Roeder Journal: J R Soc Interface Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 4.118