Literature DB >> 19254328

A novel view on stem cell development: analysing the shape of cellular genealogies.

I Glauche1, R Lorenz, D Hasenclever, I Roeder.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The analysis of individual cell fates within a population of stem and progenitor cells is still a major experimental challenge in stem cell biology. However, new monitoring techniques, such as high-resolution time-lapse video microscopy, facilitate tracking and quantitative analysis of single cells and their progeny. Information on cellular development, divisional history and differentiation are naturally comprised into a pedigree-like structure, denoted as cellular genealogy. To extract reliable information concerning effecting variables and control mechanisms underlying cell fate decisions, it is necessary to analyse a large number of cellular genealogies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Here, we propose a set of statistical measures that are specifically tailored for the analysis of cellular genealogies. These measures address the degree and symmetry of cellular expansion, as well as occurrence and correlation of characteristic events such as cell death. Furthermore, we discuss two different methods for reconstruction of lineage fate decisions and show their impact on the interpretation of asymmetric developments. In order to illustrate these techniques, and to circumvent the present shortage of available experimental data, we obtain cellular genealogies from a single-cell-based mathematical model of haematopoietic stem cell organization. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: Based on statistical analysis of cellular genealogies, we conclude that effects of external variables, such as growth conditions, are imprinted in their topology. Moreover, we demonstrate that it is essential to analyse timing of cell fate-specific changes and of occurrence of cell death events in the divisional context in order to understand the mechanisms of lineage commitment.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19254328      PMCID: PMC6496517          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2009.00586.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Prolif        ISSN: 0960-7722            Impact factor:   6.831


  23 in total

1.  Modeling stem cell population growth: incorporating terms for proliferative heterogeneity.

Authors:  B M Deasy; R J Jankowski; T R Payne; B Cao; J P Goff; J S Greenberger; J Huard
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.277

Review 2.  The cell biology of neurogenesis.

Authors:  Magdalena Götz; Wieland B Huttner
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 94.444

3.  Asymmetric cell divisions promote stratification and differentiation of mammalian skin.

Authors:  Terry Lechler; Elaine Fuchs
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Automated cell lineage construction: a rapid method to analyze clonal development established with murine neural progenitor cells.

Authors:  Omar Al-Kofahi; Richard J Radke; Susan K Goderie; Qin Shen; Sally Temple; Badrinath Roysam
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  Lineage specification of hematopoietic stem cells: mathematical modeling and biological implications.

Authors:  Ingmar Glauche; Michael Cross; Markus Loeffler; Ingo Roeder
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 6.277

Review 6.  Exploring hematopoiesis at single cell resolution.

Authors:  Michael A Rieger; Timm Schroeder
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 2.481

7.  SEARCHING FOR EVOLUTIONARY PATTERNS IN THE SHAPE OF A PHYLOGENETIC TREE.

Authors:  Mark Kirxpatrick; Montgomery Slatkin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Bifurcation dynamics in lineage-commitment in bipotent progenitor cells.

Authors:  Sui Huang; Yan-Ping Guo; Gillian May; Tariq Enver
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2007-03-03       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 9.  Inference, validation, and dynamic modeling of transcription networks in multipotent hematopoietic cells.

Authors:  Shamit Soneji; Sui Huang; Matthew Loose; Ian John Donaldson; Roger Patient; Berthold Göttgens; Tariq Enver; Gillian May
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Support for the immortal strand hypothesis: neural stem cells partition DNA asymmetrically in vitro.

Authors:  Phillip Karpowicz; Cindi Morshead; Angela Kam; Eric Jervis; John Ramunas; John Ramuns; Vincent Cheng; Derek van der Kooy
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Estimation methods for heterogeneous cell population models in systems biology.

Authors:  Steffen Waldherr
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Quantitative semi-automated analysis of morphogenesis with single-cell resolution in complex embryos.

Authors:  Claudiu A Giurumescu; Sukryool Kang; Thomas A Planchon; Eric Betzig; Joshua Bloomekatz; Deborah Yelon; Pamela Cosman; Andrew D Chisholm
Journal:  Development       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 6.868

3.  Dissecting mechanisms of mouse embryonic stem cells heterogeneity through a model-based analysis of transcription factor dynamics.

Authors:  Maria Herberg; Ingmar Glauche; Thomas Zerjatke; Maria Winzi; Frank Buchholz; Ingo Roeder
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 4.  Designing materials to direct stem-cell fate.

Authors:  Matthias P Lutolf; Penney M Gilbert; Helen M Blau
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  A novel validation algorithm allows for automated cell tracking and the extraction of biologically meaningful parameters.

Authors:  Daniel H Rapoport; Tim Becker; Amir Madany Mamlouk; Simone Schicktanz; Charli Kruse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Ontology patterns for the representation of quality changes of cells in time.

Authors:  Patryk Burek; Nico Scherf; Heinrich Herre
Journal:  J Biomed Semantics       Date:  2019-10-16

7.  Lineage marker synchrony in hematopoietic genealogies refutes the PU.1/GATA1 toggle switch paradigm.

Authors:  Michael K Strasser; Philipp S Hoppe; Dirk Loeffler; Konstantinos D Kokkaliaris; Timm Schroeder; Fabian J Theis; Carsten Marr
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 14.919

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.