Literature DB >> 19253096

Prosthetic feet: state-of-the-art review and the importance of mimicking human ankle-foot biomechanics.

Rino Versluys1, Pieter Beyl, Michael Van Damme, Anja Desomer, Ronald Van Ham, Dirk Lefeber.   

Abstract

Numerous prosthetic feet are currently on the market for individuals with a transtibial amputation, each device aimed at raising the 3C-level (control, comfort and cosmetics) with slightly different characteristics. In general, prosthetic feet can be classified into three categories. These are, following the time line: conventional feet (CF), energy-storing-and-returning (ESR) feet and the recent so-called 'bionic' feet. Researchers have shown enhanced performance properties of ESR feet compared with early CF. However, even with the advanced technology, none of the ESR feet is capable of significantly reducing energy cost of walking or enhancing prosthetic gait (Nielsen et al. J Prosthet Orthotics 1989;1:24-31; Waters et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976;58:42-46; Torburn et al. J Rehabil Res Dev 1990;27:369-384). From the 1990s, gradually more attention has been paid to the incorporation of active elements in prosthetic feet as the passive devices are not capable of providing the individual with sufficient ankle power during gait. Most part of the 'bionic' devices are still on the research level nowadays but one can expect that they will become available on the market soon. In this article, the evolution of prosthetic feet over the last two decades is reflected. The importance of mimicking human ankle-foot biomechanics with prosthetic feet is briefly discussed. Prior work in both objective and subjective evaluation of prosthetic gait is reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19253096     DOI: 10.1080/17483100802715092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol        ISSN: 1748-3107


  18 in total

1.  The effects of a controlled energy storage and return prototype prosthetic foot on transtibial amputee ambulation.

Authors:  Ava D Segal; Karl E Zelik; Glenn K Klute; David C Morgenroth; Michael E Hahn; Michael S Orendurff; Peter G Adamczyk; Steven H Collins; Arthur D Kuo; Joseph M Czerniecki
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 2.161

2.  A Compact, Lightweight Robotic Ankle-Foot Prosthesis: Featuring a Powered Polycentric Design.

Authors:  Lukas Gabert; Sarah Hood; Minh Tran; Marco Cempini; Tommaso Lenzi
Journal:  IEEE Robot Autom Mag       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 5.143

3.  Prosthetic forefoot and heel stiffness across consecutive foot stiffness categories and sizes.

Authors:  Anne T Turner; Elizabeth G Halsne; Joshua M Caputo; Carl S Curran; Andrew H Hansen; Brian J Hafner; David C Morgenroth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Design of an Underactuated Powered Ankle and Toe Prosthesis.

Authors:  Lukas Gabert; Minh Tran; Tommaso Lenzi
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2021-11

5.  Quantitative analysis of human ankle characteristics at different gait phases and speeds for utilizing in ankle-foot prosthetic design.

Authors:  Zahra Safaeepour; Ali Esteki; Farhad Tabatabai Ghomshe; Noor Azuan Abu Osman
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  Kinematic and biomimetic assessment of a hydraulic ankle/foot in level ground and camber walking.

Authors:  Xuefei Bai; David Ewins; Andrew D Crocombe; Wei Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Muscle activation patterns during walking from transtibial amputees recorded within the residual limb-prosthetic interface.

Authors:  Stephanie Huang; Daniel P Ferris
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 8.  Amputation and rotationplasty in children with limb deficiencies: current concepts.

Authors:  Ralph Sakkers; Iris van Wijk
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 1.548

9.  Prosthetic energy return during walking increases after 3 weeks of adaptation to a new device.

Authors:  Samuel F Ray; Shane R Wurdeman; Kota Z Takahashi
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Laboratory- and community-based health outcomes in people with transtibial amputation using crossover and energy-storing prosthetic feet: A randomized crossover trial.

Authors:  Sara J Morgan; Cody L McDonald; Elizabeth G Halsne; Sarah M Cheever; Rana Salem; Patricia A Kramer; Brian J Hafner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.