Literature DB >> 19251004

Impact of a transparent hood on the performance of total colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

Yoshihiro Harada1, Dai Hirasawa, Naotaka Fujita, Yutaka Noda, Go Kobayashi, Kazuhiko Ishida, Makoto Yonechi, Kei Ito, Takashi Suzuki, Toshiki Sugawara, Jun Horaguchi, Osamu Takasawa, Takashi Obana, Tetsuya Oohira, Kengo Onochi, Yoshihide Kanno, Masatake Kuroha, Wataru Iwai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical demand for total colonoscopy (TCS) is increasing. Improvement of the cecal intubation rate and shortening of the examination time would expand the capacity for TCS.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of a transparent hood attached to the tip of a colonoscope for cecal intubation in TCS.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled study.
SETTING: Single tertiary-referral center.
INTERVENTIONS: TCS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Cecal intubation time and rate, complications, patient discomfort, and detection rate of colonic polyps.
METHODS: Patients who were to undergo screening and/or surveillance TCS for colorectal cancer were invited to participate in the study. Cecal intubation time and rate, complications, patient discomfort, and detection rate of colonic polyps were evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 592 patients enrolled in this study were randomly allocated to the hood group and no-hood group. The mean (SD) cecal intubation time in the hood group and the no-hood group was 10.2 +/- 12.5 minutes and 13.4 +/- 15.8 minutes, respectively (P = .0241). The effect of its use was more prominent in the expert endoscopists group compared with those with moderate experience. The cecal intubation rate and the detection rate of small polyps in the 2 groups were similar. The grade of patient discomfort was significantly lower in the hood group. No complications were encountered with the use of the hood.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of a transparent hood on the tip of a colonoscope shortened the time required for cecal intubation and decreased patient discomfort; such use was more effective among experts in shortening the examination time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19251004     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.08.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  29 in total

1.  Prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating cap-assisted colonoscopy vs standard colonoscopy.

Authors:  Hoi-Poh Tee; Crispin Corte; Hamdan Al-Ghamdi; Emilia Prakoso; John Darke; Raman Chettiar; Wassim Rahman; Scott Davison; Sean-P Griffin; Warwick-S Selby; Arthur-J Kaffes
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Hood colonoscopy in trainees: a useful adjunct to improve the performance.

Authors:  Raffaele Manta; Benedetto Mangiavillano; Paolo Fedeli; Paolo Viaggi; Danilo Castellani; Rita Conigliaro; Enzo Masci; Gabrio Bassotti
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Magnifying gastroscopy using a soft black hood for difficult colonoscopy.

Authors:  Hisashi Nakamura; Kuangi Fu; Akihiko Yamamura
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Spatial orientation in pathway surgery.

Authors:  Chunman Fan; Dimitra Dodou; Paul Breedveld; Jenny Dankelman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy according to lesion location and endoscopist training level.

Authors:  Dong Jun Kim; Hyung Wook Kim; Su Bum Park; Dae Hwan Kang; Cheol Woong Choi; Joung Boom Hong; Byoung Hoon Ji; Chang Seok Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Can cap-assisted colonoscopy be a savior for right side interval cancer?

Authors:  Hyung Hun Kim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  Transparent cap colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jenna L Morgan; Kathryn Thomas; Sarah Braungart; Richard L Nelson
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Indigocarmine added to the water exchange method enhances adenoma detection - a RCT.

Authors:  Joseph Leung; Surinder Mann; Rodelei Siao-Salera; Catherine Ngo; Randy McCreery; Wilhemina Canete; Felix Leung
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07-01

9.  Retrograde-viewing device improves adenoma detection rate in colonoscopies for surveillance and diagnostic workup.

Authors:  Peter D Siersema; Amit Rastogi; Anke M Leufkens; Paul A Akerman; Kassem Azzouzi; Richard I Rothstein; Frank P Vleggaar; Alessandro Repici; Giacomo Rando; Patrick I Okolo; Olivier Dewit; Ana Ignjatovic; Elizabeth Odstrcil; James East; Pierre H Deprez; Brian P Saunders; Anthony N Kalloo; Bradley Creel; Vikas Singh; Anne Marie Lennon; Daniel C DeMarco
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Endoscopic innovations to increase the adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy.

Authors:  Vincent K Dik; Leon Mg Moons; Peter D Siersema
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.