Literature DB >> 21487877

Magnifying gastroscopy using a soft black hood for difficult colonoscopy.

Hisashi Nakamura1, Kuangi Fu, Akihiko Yamamura.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Various methods are reported as aids to cecal intubation for cases in which colonoscopy is difficult. This study aimed to investigate prospectively whether a gastroscope with magnification function, narrow-band imaging (NBI), and a soft black hood can aid insertion in cases of difficult colonoscopy and facilitate both accurate diagnosis and safe treatment.
METHODS: This prospective study recruited 177 patients. All were examined with a magnifying gastroscope. A commercially available soft black hood was attached to the gastroscope during insertion and magnification. Difficult colonoscopy was anticipated before colonoscopy in cases of patients with at least one of the following factors: low BMI (<20 kg/m(2)), adhesion due to previous surgery, or previous colonoscopy that could not reach to the cecum. The success rate and duration of cecal intubation then were assessed. All detected lesions were evaluated by magnifying NBI and then classified as non-neoplastic or neoplastic for endoscopic diagnosis. Subsequently, all the lesions were removed and examined histologically for comparison.
RESULTS: The overall success rate of cecal intubation was 100% (177/177), and the mean time taken to reach the cecum was 5.9 min. A total of 156 lesions were detected endoscopically, and the overall diagnostic accuracy of NBI with magnification was 98.7%. No associated complications occurred.
CONCLUSION: Magnifying gastroscopy using a soft black hood and NBI is useful for cecal intubation in cases wherein colonoscopy is difficult, facilitating accurate diagnosis and safe treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21487877     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1662-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  22 in total

1.  Quality of air contrast barium enema performed the same day as incomplete colonoscopy with air insufflation.

Authors:  D G Mark; D K Rex; J C Lappas
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Usefulness of a small-caliber, variable-stiffness colonoscope as a backup in patients with difficult or incomplete colonoscopy.

Authors:  Akira Horiuchi; Yoshiko Nakayama; Masashi Kajiyama; Hideyasu Fujii; Naoki Tanaka
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Going for the loop: a unique overtube for the difficult colonoscopy.

Authors:  Rami Hawari; Pankaj Jay Pasricha
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.062

Review 4.  Nonpolypoid neoplastic lesions of the colorectal mucosa.

Authors:  Shin ei Kudo; René Lambert; John I Allen; Hiroaki Fujii; Takahiro Fujii; Hiroshi Kashida; Takahisa Matsuda; Masaki Mori; Hiroshi Saito; Tadakazu Shimoda; Shinji Tanaka; Hidenobu Watanabe; Joseph J Sung; Andrew D Feld; John M Inadomi; Michael J O'Brien; David A Lieberman; David F Ransohoff; Roy M Soetikno; George Triadafilopoulos; Ann Zauber; Claudio Rolim Teixeira; Jean François Rey; Edgar Jaramillo; Carlos A Rubio; Andre Van Gossum; Michael Jung; Michael Vieth; Jeremy R Jass; Paul D Hurlstone
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 5.  Achieving cecal intubation in the very difficult colon.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  A randomized controlled trial evaluating the usefulness of a transparent hood attached to the tip of the colonoscope.

Authors:  Shintaro Kondo; Yutaka Yamaji; Hirotsugu Watabe; Atsuo Yamada; Takafumi Sugimoto; Miki Ohta; Keiji Ogura; Makoto Okamoto; Haruhiko Yoshida; Takao Kawabe; Masao Omata
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 7.  Methods of reducing discomfort during colonoscopy.

Authors:  Felix W Leung
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Meshed capillary vessels by use of narrow-band imaging for differential diagnosis of small colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Yasushi Sano; Hiroaki Ikematsu; Kuang I Fu; Fabian Emura; Atsushi Katagiri; Takahiro Horimatsu; Kazuhiro Kaneko; Roy Soetikno; Shigeaki Yoshida
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Improved colorectal adenoma detection with a transparent retractable extension device.

Authors:  Akira Horiuchi; Yoshiko Nakayama
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 10.  Water-related techniques for performance of colonoscopy.

Authors:  Felix W Leung
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 3.199

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Transparent cap colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy to improve caecal intubation.

Authors:  Jenna Morgan; Kathryn Thomas; Heather Lee-Robichaud; Richard L Nelson; Sarah Braungart
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-12-12

2.  Colonic architectural change on colonoscopy in patients taking psychotropic medications.

Authors:  Eu Jin Tan; Keng Chuan Soh; Kee Yuan Ngiam
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 4.584

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.