BACKGROUND: National data find glycemic control is within target (A1c<7.0%) for 37% of patients with diabetes, and only 7% meet recommended glycemic, lipid, and blood pressure goals. OBJECTIVES: To compare active interventions and usual care for glucose control in a randomized clinical trial (RCT) among persons with diabetes cared for by primary care physicians (PCPs) over the course of 1 year. METHODS:Physician practices (n=36) in 4 geographic areas are randomly assigned to 1 of 4 study groups. The intervention is a diabetes communication system, using mobile phones and patient/physician portals to allow patient-specific treatment and communication. All physicians receive American Diabetes Association (ADA) Guidelines for diabetes care. Patients with poor diabetes control (A1c> or =7.5%) at baseline (n=260) are enrolled in study groups based on PCP randomization. All study patients receive blood glucose (BG) meters and a year's supply of testing materials. Patients in three treatment groups select one of two mobile phone models, receive one-year unlimited mobile phone data and service plan, register on the web-based individual patient portal and receive study treatment phone software based on study assignment. Control group patients receive usual care from their PCP. The primary outcome is mean change in A1c over a 12-month intervention period. CONCLUSION: Traditional methods of disease management have not achieved adequate control for BG and other conditions important to persons with diabetes. Tools to improve communication between patients and PCPs may improve patient outcomes and be satisfactory to patients and physicians. This RCT is ongoing.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: National data find glycemic control is within target (A1c<7.0%) for 37% of patients with diabetes, and only 7% meet recommended glycemic, lipid, and blood pressure goals. OBJECTIVES: To compare active interventions and usual care for glucose control in a randomized clinical trial (RCT) among persons with diabetes cared for by primary care physicians (PCPs) over the course of 1 year. METHODS: Physician practices (n=36) in 4 geographic areas are randomly assigned to 1 of 4 study groups. The intervention is a diabetes communication system, using mobile phones and patient/physician portals to allow patient-specific treatment and communication. All physicians receive American Diabetes Association (ADA) Guidelines for diabetes care. Patients with poor diabetes control (A1c> or =7.5%) at baseline (n=260) are enrolled in study groups based on PCP randomization. All study patients receive blood glucose (BG) meters and a year's supply of testing materials. Patients in three treatment groups select one of two mobile phone models, receive one-year unlimited mobile phone data and service plan, register on the web-based individual patient portal and receive study treatment phone software based on study assignment. Control group patients receive usual care from their PCP. The primary outcome is mean change in A1c over a 12-month intervention period. CONCLUSION: Traditional methods of disease management have not achieved adequate control for BG and other conditions important to persons with diabetes. Tools to improve communication between patients and PCPs may improve patient outcomes and be satisfactory to patients and physicians. This RCT is ongoing.
Authors: Hun-Sung Kim; Yunji Hwang; Jae-Ho Lee; Hye Young Oh; Yi-Jun Kim; Hyeon Yoon Kwon; Hyoseung Kang; Hyunah Kim; Rae Woong Park; Ju Han Kim Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2014-04-02 Impact factor: 3.536