OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine whether patient participation in decision-making about diabetes care is associated with understanding of diabetes self-management and subsequent self-care practices. We also identified issues that would impact messaging for use in mobile diabetes communication. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted with type 2 diabetes patients (n = 81) receiving their care at the University of Maryland Joslin Diabetes Center. A convenience sample of patients were eligible to participate if they were aged 25-85 years, had type 2 diabetes, spoke English, and visited their physician diabetes manager within the past 6 months. In-person patient interviews were conducted at the time of clinic visits to assess patient understanding of diabetes management, self-care practices, and perceptions of participation in decision-making about diabetes care. RESULTS: African Americans reported fewer opportunities to participate in decision-making than Caucasians, after controlling for education [mean difference (MD) = -2.4, p = .02]. This association became insignificant after controlling for patient-physician race concordance (MD = -1.5, p = .21). Patient understanding of self-care was predicted by having greater than high school education (MD = 3.6, p = .001) and having physicians who involved them in decision-making about their care. For each unit increase in understanding of diabetes self-care, the mean patient self-care practice score increased by 0.16 (p = .003), after adjustment for patient race and education. CONCLUSIONS: Patient participation in decision-making is associated with better understanding of care. Participation in decision-making plays a key role in patient understanding of diabetes self-management and subsequent self-care practices. Patients with limited education need specific instruction in foot care, food choices, and monitoring hemoglobin A1c.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine whether patient participation in decision-making about diabetes care is associated with understanding of diabetes self-management and subsequent self-care practices. We also identified issues that would impact messaging for use in mobile diabetes communication. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted with type 2 diabetespatients (n = 81) receiving their care at the University of Maryland Joslin Diabetes Center. A convenience sample of patients were eligible to participate if they were aged 25-85 years, had type 2 diabetes, spoke English, and visited their physician diabetes manager within the past 6 months. In-personpatient interviews were conducted at the time of clinic visits to assess patient understanding of diabetes management, self-care practices, and perceptions of participation in decision-making about diabetes care. RESULTS: African Americans reported fewer opportunities to participate in decision-making than Caucasians, after controlling for education [mean difference (MD) = -2.4, p = .02]. This association became insignificant after controlling for patient-physician race concordance (MD = -1.5, p = .21). Patient understanding of self-care was predicted by having greater than high school education (MD = 3.6, p = .001) and having physicians who involved them in decision-making about their care. For each unit increase in understanding of diabetes self-care, the mean patient self-care practice score increased by 0.16 (p = .003), after adjustment for patient race and education. CONCLUSIONS:Patient participation in decision-making is associated with better understanding of care. Participation in decision-making plays a key role in patient understanding of diabetes self-management and subsequent self-care practices. Patients with limited education need specific instruction in foot care, food choices, and monitoring hemoglobin A1c.
Authors: Michele Heisler; Reynard R Bouknight; Rodney A Hayward; Dylan M Smith; Eve A Kerr Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Renee Royak-Schaler; Carrie N Klabunde; Wendy F Greene; Donald R Lannin; Brenda DeVellis; Kenneth R Wilson; Brian Cheuvront Journal: Medscape Womens Health Date: 2002 Mar-Apr
Authors: Charlene C Quinn; Ann L Gruber-Baldini; Michelle Shardell; Kelly Weed; Suzanne S Clough; Malinda Peeples; Michael Terrin; Lauren Bronich-Hall; Erik Barr; Dan Lender Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2009-02-27 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Lisa A Cooper; Debra L Roter; Rachel L Johnson; Daniel E Ford; Donald M Steinwachs; Neil R Powe Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2003-12-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Merel M Ruissen; Jacob K Sont; Heidi A van Vugt; Marleen Kunneman; Guy E H M Rutten; Eelco J P de Koning Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2022-03-28 Impact factor: 2.711
Authors: Isaac Rahimian Boogar; Mohammad Reza Mohajeri-Tehrani; Mohammad Ali Besharat; Seyavash Talepasand Journal: Iran J Public Health Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 1.429