Literature DB >> 19249580

Minimally invasive/endoscopic vs "open" posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy: do the risks outweigh the benefits?

Nancy E Epstein.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19249580     DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2008.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Neurol        ISSN: 0090-3019


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Anatomical study of the cervical nerve roots for posterior foraminotomy: cadaveric study.

Authors:  Mohamed Barakat; Youssef Hussein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  [SENDS criteria from the diversification of MAST procedures. Implementation of preoperative simulation].

Authors:  B Rieger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Minimally invasive tubular access for posterior cervical foraminotomy.

Authors:  Byron C Branch; Donald L Hilton; Clark Watts
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2015-05-19

4.  Minimally Invasive versus Open Cervical Foraminotomy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Clark; Kalil G Abdullah; Michael P Steinmetz; Edward C Benzel; Thomas E Mroz
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2011-12

5.  Open laminoforaminotomy: A lost art?

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2015-11-25

6.  What Can Spine Surgeons Do to Improve Patient Care and Avoid Medical Negligence Suits?

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2020-03-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.