BACKGROUND: The possible advantage for weight loss of a diet that emphasizes protein, fat, or carbohydrates has not been established, and there are few studies that extend beyond 1 year. METHODS: We randomly assigned 811 overweight adults to one of four diets; the targeted percentages of energy derived from fat, protein, and carbohydrates in the four diets were 20, 15, and 65%; 20, 25, and 55%; 40, 15, and 45%; and 40, 25, and 35%. The diets consisted of similar foods and met guidelines for cardiovascular health. The participants were offered group and individual instructional sessions for 2 years. The primary outcome was the change in body weight after 2 years in two-by-two factorial comparisons of low fat versus high fat and average protein versus high protein and in the comparison of highest and lowest carbohydrate content. RESULTS: At 6 months, participants assigned to each diet had lost an average of 6 kg, which represented 7% of their initial weight; they began to regain weight after 12 months. By 2 years, weight loss remained similar in those who were assigned to a diet with 15% protein and those assigned to a diet with 25% protein (3.0 and 3.6 kg, respectively); in those assigned to a diet with 20% fat and those assigned to a diet with 40% fat (3.3 kg for both groups); and in those assigned to a diet with 65% carbohydrates and those assigned to a diet with 35% carbohydrates (2.9 and 3.4 kg, respectively) (P>0.20 for all comparisons). Among the 80% of participants who completed the trial, the average weight loss was 4 kg; 14 to 15% of the participants had a reduction of at least 10% of their initial body weight. Satiety, hunger, satisfaction with the diet, and attendance at group sessions were similar for all diets; attendance was strongly associated with weight loss (0.2 kg per session attended). The diets improved lipid-related risk factors and fasting insulin levels. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced-calorie diets result in clinically meaningful weight loss regardless of which macronutrients they emphasize. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00072995.) 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The possible advantage for weight loss of a diet that emphasizes protein, fat, or carbohydrates has not been established, and there are few studies that extend beyond 1 year. METHODS: We randomly assigned 811 overweight adults to one of four diets; the targeted percentages of energy derived from fat, protein, and carbohydrates in the four diets were 20, 15, and 65%; 20, 25, and 55%; 40, 15, and 45%; and 40, 25, and 35%. The diets consisted of similar foods and met guidelines for cardiovascular health. The participants were offered group and individual instructional sessions for 2 years. The primary outcome was the change in body weight after 2 years in two-by-two factorial comparisons of low fat versus high fat and average protein versus high protein and in the comparison of highest and lowest carbohydrate content. RESULTS: At 6 months, participants assigned to each diet had lost an average of 6 kg, which represented 7% of their initial weight; they began to regain weight after 12 months. By 2 years, weight loss remained similar in those who were assigned to a diet with 15% protein and those assigned to a diet with 25% protein (3.0 and 3.6 kg, respectively); in those assigned to a diet with 20% fat and those assigned to a diet with 40% fat (3.3 kg for both groups); and in those assigned to a diet with 65% carbohydrates and those assigned to a diet with 35% carbohydrates (2.9 and 3.4 kg, respectively) (P>0.20 for all comparisons). Among the 80% of participants who completed the trial, the average weight loss was 4 kg; 14 to 15% of the participants had a reduction of at least 10% of their initial body weight. Satiety, hunger, satisfaction with the diet, and attendance at group sessions were similar for all diets; attendance was strongly associated with weight loss (0.2 kg per session attended). The diets improved lipid-related risk factors and fasting insulin levels. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced-calorie diets result in clinically meaningful weight loss regardless of which macronutrients they emphasize. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00072995.) 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society
Authors: Catherine M Champagne; Margaret L Bogle; Bernestine B McGee; Kathy Yadrick; H Raymond Allen; Tim R Kramer; Pippa Simpson; Jeffrey Gossett; Judith Weber Journal: J Am Diet Assoc Date: 2004-02
Authors: Sai Krupa Das; Cheryl H Gilhooly; Julie K Golden; Anastassios G Pittas; Paul J Fuss; Rachel A Cheatham; Stephanie Tyler; Michelle Tsay; Megan A McCrory; Alice H Lichtenstein; Gerard E Dallal; Chhanda Dutta; Manjushri V Bhapkar; James P Delany; Edward Saltzman; Susan B Roberts Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Natalie D Luscombe-Marsh; Manny Noakes; Gary A Wittert; Jennifer B Keogh; Paul Foster; Peter M Clifton Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Christopher D Gardner; Alexandre Kiazand; Sofiya Alhassan; Soowon Kim; Randall S Stafford; Raymond R Balise; Helena C Kraemer; Abby C King Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-03-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Francesco Angelico; Lorenzo Loffredo; Pasquale Pignatelli; Teresa Augelletti; Roberto Carnevale; Antonio Pacella; Fabiana Albanese; Ilaria Mancini; Serena Di Santo; Maria Del Ben; Francesco Violi Journal: Intern Emerg Med Date: 2011-04-22 Impact factor: 3.397
Authors: Allon N Friedman; Lorraine G Ogden; Gary D Foster; Samuel Klein; Richard Stein; Bernard Miller; James O Hill; Carrie Brill; Brooke Bailer; Diane R Rosenbaum; Holly R Wyatt Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2012-05-31 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Leonor Corsino; María Pilar Rocha-Goldberg; Bryan C Batch; David I Ortiz-Melo; Hayden B Bosworth; Laura P Svetkey Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2012 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Tian Hu; Katherine T Mills; Lu Yao; Kathryn Demanelis; Mohamed Eloustaz; William S Yancy; Tanika N Kelly; Jiang He; Lydia A Bazzano Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2012-10-01 Impact factor: 4.897