Literature DB >> 19240831

What is the best tumor size to achieve optimal functional results in vestibular schwannoma surgery?

Mislav Gjuric1, Milan Rudic.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyze our own functional results to delineate a critical vestibular schwannoma size for middle cranial fossa (MCF) surgery with the best possible outcome. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review.
SETTING: Academic tertiary referral center.
METHODS: Tumors were divided into intracanalicular, tumors 1 to 5, 6 to 10, and 11 to 15 mm in the cerebellopontine angle (CPA). Patients were evaluated at 2 months, 1 year, and 5 years after surgery.
RESULTS: At 1 year, House-Brackmann score of I or II was obtained in 100% of intracanalicular and in 96%, 86%, and 85% with tumors up to 5, 10, and 15 mm in the CPA, respectively. Class I hearing was postoperatively preserved in 61%, 41%, 29%, and 20%, and measurable word recognition in 67%, 51%, 35%, and 21% of patients, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The outcome is predominantly a function of tumor size, and these changes influence MCF surgery at an earlier stage than in the translabyrinthine or retrosigmoid approach. For the facial nerve, there is a cutoff at 5-mm extracanalicular extension. Also, chances for successful hearing preservation decrease rapidly with size, and in tumors beyond 1.5 cm are below 20%. Consequently, although an expectant policy with small tumors may be reasonable in some instances, it is not so for MCF candidates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Vestibular schwannoma; facial nerve; hearing preservation; long-term results; middle cranial fossa; tumor size

Year:  2008        PMID: 19240831      PMCID: PMC2637067          DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1086056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skull Base        ISSN: 1531-5010


  28 in total

1.  Small acoustic neuromas: surgical outcomes versus observation or radiation.

Authors:  Ted A Meyer; Paul A Canty; Eric P Wilkinson; Marlan R Hansen; Jay T Rubinstein; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Is the entire fundus of the internal auditory canal visible during the middle fossa approach for acoustic neuroma?

Authors:  C L Driscoll; R K Jackler; L H Pitts; V Banthia
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  2000-05

3.  Middle fossa approach for hearing preservation with acoustic neuromas.

Authors:  W H Slattery; D E Brackmann; W Hitselberger
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1997-09

4.  Enlarged middle fossa vestibular schwannoma surgery: experience with 735 cases.

Authors:  M Gjurić; M E Wigand; S R Wolf
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Selection of surgical approaches for small acoustic neurinomas.

Authors:  Y Kumon; S Sakaki; K Kohno; S Ohta; K Nakagawa; S Ohue; S Murakami; N Yanagihara
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2000-01

6.  Facial function in hearing preservation acoustic neuroma surgery.

Authors:  M A Arriaga; D A Chen
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2001-05

Review 7.  Retrosigmoid approach for small and medium-sized acoustic neuromas.

Authors:  Jacques Magnan; Marco Barbieri; Renato Mora; Sreerama Murphy; Renaud Meller; Michel Bruzzo; André Chays
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Stability of hearing preservation following acoustic neuroma surgery.

Authors:  D L Tucci; S A Telian; P R Kileny; J T Hoff; J L Kemink
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1994-03

9.  Technical modifications to the middle fossa craniotomy approach in removal of acoustic neuromas.

Authors:  D E Brackmann; J R House; W E Hitselberger
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1994-09

10.  Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma). American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, INC.

Authors: 
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.497

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Postoperative imaging of the internal auditory canal : Visualization of active auditory implants.

Authors:  I Todt; G Rademacher; P Mittmann; S Mutze; A Ernst
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  [Postoperative imaging of the internal auditory canal : Visualization of active auditory implants. German version].

Authors:  I Todt; G Rademacher; P Mittmann; S Mutze; A Ernst
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  [Vestibular schwannoma. Part 2: therapy, prognosis, and rehabilitation].

Authors:  W Maier; F Hassepaß; A Aschendorff; R Laszig
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  [Hearing results after middle fossa removal of small (T1/T2) vestibular schwannomas].

Authors:  M Scheich; D Ehrmann-Müller; W Shehata-Dieler; R Hagen
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 5.  [Value of different strategies in the treatment of vestibular schwannoma: therapeutic aspects and literature analysis].

Authors:  W Maier; T D Grauvogel; R Laszig; G J Ridder
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Preoperative identification of facial nerve in vestibular schwannomas surgery using diffusion tensor tractography.

Authors:  Kyung-Sik Choi; Min-Su Kim; Hyeok-Gyu Kwon; Sung-Ho Jang; Oh-Lyong Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2014-07-31

7.  Multi-option therapy vs observation for small acoustic neuroma: hearing-focused management.

Authors:  E Zanoletti; D Cazzador; C Faccioli; S Gallo; L Denaro; D D'Avella; A Martini; A Mazzoni
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.124

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.