Literature DB >> 16639278

Small acoustic neuromas: surgical outcomes versus observation or radiation.

Ted A Meyer1, Paul A Canty, Eric P Wilkinson, Marlan R Hansen, Jay T Rubinstein, Bruce J Gantz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate factors affecting outcomes of small acoustic neuroma (AN) removal via a middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach, and compare results to published data on observation and radiation therapy. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review.
SETTING: Academic tertiary referral center.
METHODS: 162 consecutive patients (ages 19-70) with unilateral AN (0.2-2.5 cm in largest dimension) removed through a MCF approach were reviewed focusing on preservation of hearing, facial nerve function and complications. One hundred thirteen patients had pre-operative word recognition scores (WRS)>70%.
RESULTS: Both tumor size and pre-operative WRS were related to post-operative WRS (p<0.01). Overall, at least some hearing was preserved in 94 (60%) of the 156 patients who had hearing before surgery. If the WRS was also >70% (N=113), 56 (50%) maintained WRS>70%. Importantly, WRS for 12 others improved to >70% after surgery. When the patients were stratified by tumor size, the patients with small tumors (2-10 mm) faired better than the overall group. At least some hearing was preserved in 65 (72%) of the 90 patients. If the WRS was also >70% (N=66), 39 (59%) maintained WRS>70%. WRS for eight others improved to >70% after surgery. When the tumor was 1.1-1.4 cm (N=34), the chance of preserving some hearing decreased to 42% (14/33). If the WRS was also >70% (N=23), 9 (39%) maintained WRS>70%. WRS for three others improved to >70% after surgery. When the tumor reached 1.5-2.5 cm (N=35), the hearing preservation rate was 43%. If the WRS was also >70% (N=24), only eight (33%) maintained WRS of 70%, and one other improved to >70%. The addition of intra-operative whole eighth nerve near field monitoring improved results during small tumor (<or=1.0 cm) removal preserving some hearing in 80% (32/40) and preserving >70% WRS in 76% (22/29) of those with >70% pre-operative WRS. Good facial nerve function (HB I-II) was achieved in 97% (86% HB I). When tumor size was <or=1.0 cm (N=93), however, good facial nerve function was obtained in 100% (94% HB I). Complications included CSF leak: 9 (5.5%); seizure: 2 (1.2%); and recurrence: 1 (0.6%).
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that removal of unilateral AN through an MCF approach when the tumor is small and hearing is good provides the best opportunity for hearing preservation and normal facial nerve function. Observation historically results in tumor growth in young and middle-age patients with subsequent hearing loss. Radiation may prevent most tumors from growing, and more data are needed to determine long-term tumor control and hearing preservation rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16639278     DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200604000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  30 in total

1.  Outcome on hearing and facial nerve function in microsurgical treatment of small vestibular schwannoma via the middle cranial fossa approach.

Authors:  Christian Ginzkey; Matthias Scheich; Wilma Harnisch; Verena Bonn; Desiree Ehrmann-Müller; Wafaa Shehata-Dieler; Robert Mlynski; Rudolf Hagen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Surgical management of internal auditory canal and cerebellopontine angle facial nerve schwannoma.

Authors:  Sarah Mowry; Marlan Hansen; Bruce Gantz
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Hearing Preservation in Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery.

Authors:  Joe Saliba; Rick A Friedman; Roberto A Cueva
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-01-10

4.  Determining benchmarks in hearing preservation surgery for vestibular schwannoma.

Authors:  Michael B Gluth; John D Day; John L Dornhoffer
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2012-08

5.  Hearing Outcomes Reporting in Lateral Skull Base Surgery.

Authors:  Geoffrey C Casazza; Christian A Bowers; Richard K Gurgel
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-12-05

6.  Long-term hearing preservation after microsurgical excision of vestibular schwannoma.

Authors:  Erika Ann Woodson; Ryan Douglas Dempewolf; Samuel Paul Gubbels; Aaron Thomas Porter; Jacob Jay Oleson; Marlan Rex Hansen; Bruce Jay Gantz
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Relationship of a "Fundal Fluid Cap" and Vestibular Schwannoma Volume: Analysis of Preoperative Radiographic Findings and Outcomes.

Authors:  Christopher Blake Sullivan; Daniel Q Sun; Zaid Al-Qurayshi; Girish Bathla; Bruno Policeni; Bruce J Gantz; Marlan R Hansen
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Vasospasm of labyrinthine artery in cerebellopontine angle surgery: evidence brought by distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Thierry Mom; Audrey Montalban; Toufic Khalil; Jean Gabrillargues; Jean Chazal; Laurent Gilain; Paul Avan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of screening MR imaging using unenhanced axial CISS and coronal T2WI for detection of small internal auditory canal lesions.

Authors:  T A Abele; D A Besachio; E P Quigley; R K Gurgel; C Shelton; H R Harnsberger; R H Wiggins
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  How I Do It: The Role of Flexible Hand-held 2μ-Thulium Laser Fiber in Microsurgical Removal of Acoustic Neuromas.

Authors:  Luciano Mastronardi; Guglielmo Cacciotti; Raffaele Roperto; Maria Pia Tonelli; Ettore Carpineta
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2017-02-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.