Literature DB >> 19236140

Is a sense of inequity an ancestral primate trait? Testing social inequity in cotton top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus).

Julie J Neiworth1, Elizabeth T Johnson, Katherine Whillock, Julia Greenberg, Vanessa Brown.   

Abstract

To address a controversy in the literature concerning whether monkeys show an aversion to inequity, individuals of a New World monkey species, cotton top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) were tested in an offering task and in a bartering task. At issue was whether the monkeys rejected rewards because of a violation of expectancy of the preferred reward, or whether they rejected rewards because of a sensitivity to socially mediated inequity. The data from both tasks indicated that the subjects were more likely to reject when preferred rewards were presented, either because of another animal eating the reward (the social condition) or because of rewards being presented but inaccessible. The bartering task led to the only behavioral indication of aversion due specifically to social inequity, which was demonstrated when tamarins' sensitivity to the difference in rewards increased with exposure to other tamarins working to receive the preferred rewards. The results suggest that social inequity aversion will be assessed by tamarins, and possibly by other primates, only under conditions of limited resources and a requirement of work, which may make the situation a bit more competitive and thus drives attention toward both social and reward evaluation. Copyright 2009 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19236140     DOI: 10.1037/a0012662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  16 in total

1.  Marmoset monkeys evaluate third-party reciprocity.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Kawai; Miyuki Yasue; Taku Banno; Noritaka Ichinohe
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Squirrel monkeys' response to inequitable outcomes indicates a behavioural convergence within the primates.

Authors:  Catherine F Talbot; Hani D Freeman; Lawrence E Williams; Sarah F Brosnan
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 3.  Prosocial primates: selfish and unselfish motivations.

Authors:  Frans B M de Waal; Malini Suchak
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Mechanisms underlying responses to inequitable outcomes in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes.

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan; Catherine Talbot; Megan Ahlgren; Susan P Lambeth; Steven J Schapiro
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Inequity aversion strategies between marmosets are influenced by partner familiarity and sex but not oxytocin.

Authors:  Aaryn C Mustoe; April M Harnisch; Benjamin Hochfelder; Jon Cavanaugh; Jeffrey A French
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 6.  Evolution of responses to (un)fairness.

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan; Frans B M de Waal
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Donor payoffs and other-regarding preferences in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus).

Authors:  Jeffrey R Stevens
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Justice- and fairness-related behaviors in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Social comparison mediates chimpanzees' responses to loss, not frustration.

Authors:  Lydia M Hopper; Susan P Lambeth; Steven J Schapiro; Sarah F Brosnan
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Exploring the Cognitive Capacities of Japanese Macaques in a Cooperation Game.

Authors:  Ryan Sigmundson; Mathieu S Stribos; Roy Hammer; Julia Herzele; Lena S Pflüger; Jorg J M Massen
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.