Literature DB >> 19232529

Monocular rivalry exhibits three hallmarks of binocular rivalry: evidence for common processes.

Robert P O'Shea1, Amanda Parker, David La Rooy, David Alais.   

Abstract

Binocular rivalry occurs when different images are presented one to each eye: the images are visible only alternately. Monocular rivalry occurs when different images are presented both to the same eye: the clarity of the images fluctuates alternately. Could both sorts of rivalry reflect the operation of a general visual mechanism for dealing with perceptual ambiguity? We report four experiments showing similarities between the two phenomena. First, we show that monocular rivalry can occur with complex images, as with binocular rivalry, and that the two phenomena are affected similarly by the size (Experiment 1) and colour (Experiment 2) of the images. Second, we show that the distribution of dominance periods during monocular rivalry has a gamma shape and is stochastic (Experiment 3). Third, we show that during periods of monocular-rivalry suppression, the threshold to detect a probe (a contrast pulse to the suppressed stimulus) is raised compared with during periods of dominance (Experiment 4). The threshold elevation is much weaker than during binocular rivalry, consistent with monocular rivalry's weak appearance. We discuss other similarities between monocular and binocular rivalry, and also some differences, concluding that part of the processing underlying both phenomena is a general visual mechanism for dealing with perceptual ambiguity.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19232529     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.01.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  18 in total

1.  On the functional order of binocular rivalry and blind spot filling-in.

Authors:  Cheng S Qian; Jan W Brascamp; Taosheng Liu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Individual peak gamma frequency predicts switch rate in perceptual rivalry.

Authors:  Jeremy D Fesi; Janine D Mendola
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Humans Perceive Binocular Rivalry and Fusion in a Tristable Dynamic State.

Authors:  Guillaume Riesen; Anthony M Norcia; Justin L Gardner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Effects of attention on visual experience during monocular rivalry.

Authors:  Eric A Reavis; Peter J Kohler; Gideon P Caplovitz; Thalia P Wheatley; Peter U Tse
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Olfaction: when nostrils compete.

Authors:  Jay A Gottfried
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Continuous flash suppression modulates cortical activity in early visual cortex.

Authors:  Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Does feature integration affect resolution of multiple simultaneous forms of ambiguity?

Authors:  Ryan Lange; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Bistable percepts in the brain: FMRI contrasts monocular pattern rivalry and binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Athena Buckthought; Samuel Jessula; Janine D Mendola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Perceptual rivalry: reflexes reveal the gradual nature of visual awareness.

Authors:  Marnix Naber; Stefan Frässle; Wolfgang Einhäuser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Temporal analysis of image-rivalry suppression.

Authors:  Rishi Bhardwaj; Robert P O'Shea
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.