Literature DB >> 28502775

On the functional order of binocular rivalry and blind spot filling-in.

Cheng S Qian1, Jan W Brascamp2, Taosheng Liu3.   

Abstract

Binocular rivalry is an important phenomenon for understanding the mechanisms of visual awareness. Here we assessed the functional locus of binocular rivalry relative to blind spot filling-in, which is thought to transpire in V1, thus providing a reference point for assessing the locus of rivalry. We conducted two experiments to explore the functional order of binocular rivalry and blind spot filling-in. Experiment 1 examined if the information filled-in at the blind spot can engage in rivalry with a physical stimulus at the corresponding location in the fellow eye. Participants' perceptual reports showed no difference between this condition and a condition where filling-in was precluded by presenting the same stimuli away from the blind spot, suggesting that the rivalry process is not influenced by any filling-in that might occur. In Experiment 2, we presented the fellow eye's stimulus directly in rivalry with the 'inducer' stimulus that surrounds the blind spot, and compared it with two control conditions away from the blind spot: one involving a ring physically identical to the inducer, and one involving a disc that resembled the filled-in percept. Perceptual reports in the blind spot condition resembled those in the 'ring' condition, more than those in the latter, 'disc' condition, indicating that a perceptually suppressed inducer does not engender filling-in. Thus, our behavioral data suggest binocular rivalry functionally precedes blind spot filling-in. We conjecture that the neural substrate of binocular rivalry suppression includes processing stages at or before V1.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Binocular rivalry; Blind spot; Filling-in; Visual awareness

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28502775      PMCID: PMC5507553          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2017.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  37 in total

1.  Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  A Polonsky; R Blake; J Braun; D J Heeger
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Dynamic surrounds of receptive fields in primate striate cortex: a physiological basis for perceptual completion?

Authors:  M Fiorani Júnior; M G Rosa; R Gattass; C E Rocha-Miranda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Characteristics of the filled-in surface at the blind spot.

Authors:  Yihwa Baek; Oakyoon Cha; Sang Chul Chong
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Monocular rivalry exhibits three hallmarks of binocular rivalry: evidence for common processes.

Authors:  Robert P O'Shea; Amanda Parker; David La Rooy; David Alais
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Binocular rivalry from invisible patterns.

Authors:  Jinyou Zou; Sheng He; Peng Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?

Authors:  N K Logothetis; D A Leopold; D L Sheinberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-04-18       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Motion-Dependent Filling-In of Spatiotemporal Information at the Blind Spot.

Authors:  Gerrit W Maus; David Whitney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Filling-in rivalry: Perceptual alternations in the absence of retinal image conflict.

Authors:  Zhimin Chen; Gerrit W Maus; David Whitney; Rachel N Denison
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Inflation versus filling-in: why we feel we see more than we actually do in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Brian Odegaard; Min Yu Chang; Hakwan Lau; Sing-Hang Cheung
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Did you see it? A Python tool for psychophysical assessment of the human blind spot.

Authors:  Xiao Ling; Edward H Silson; Robert D McIntosh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.