Literature DB >> 19230511

Conditional reinforcers and informative stimuli in a constant environment.

Nathalie Boutros1, Michael Davison, Douglas Elliffe.   

Abstract

Five pigeons responded on steady-state concurrent variable-interval variable-interval schedules of food presentation in which half of the foods were removed and replaced with nonfood stimuli. Across conditions, the stimuli were either paired or unpaired with food, and the correlation between the ratio of food deliveries on the two alternatives and the ratio of nonfood stimuli was either -1, 0, or +1. Neither the pairing of stimuli with food, nor the correlation between stimuli and food, affected generalized-matching performance, but paired stimuli had a demonstrable effect at a local level of analysis. This effect was independent of the food-stimulus correlation. These results differ from results previously obtained in a frequently changing environment. We attribute this difference in results to differences in the information value of response-contingent stimuli in frequently changing versus relatively constant environments, as well as to differences between forward pairing and simultaneous pairing of the stimuli with food.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19230511      PMCID: PMC2614817          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2009.91-41

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  22 in total

1.  Choice in a variable environment: effects of blackout duration and extinction between components.

Authors:  Michael Davison; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Reinforcer-ratio variation and its effects on rate of adaptation.

Authors:  J Landon; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Concurrent schedules: reinforcer magnitude effects.

Authors:  Jason Landon; Michael Davison; Douglas Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Concurrent-schedule performance in transition: changeover delays and signaled reinforcer ratios.

Authors:  Christian U Krägeloh; Michael Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Second-order schedules: brief shock at the completion of each component.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; P J Silverman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Second-order schedules: comparison of different procedures for scheduling paired and nonpaired brief stimuli.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; S L Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Do conditional reinforcers count?

Authors:  Michael Davison; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 9.  Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  5 in total

1.  Stimulus effects on local preference: stimulus-response contingencies, stimulus-food pairing, and stimulus-food correlation.

Authors:  Michael Davison; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Information: theory, brain, and behavior.

Authors:  Greg Jensen; Ryan D Ward; Peter D Balsam
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Contingent stimuli signal subsequent reinforcer ratios.

Authors:  Nathalie Boutros; Michael Davison; Douglas Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Reinforcement: food signals the time and location of future food.

Authors:  Sarah Cowie; Michael Davison; Douglas Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Emergent stimulus relations depend on stimulus correlation and not on reinforcement contingencies.

Authors:  Sara Tepaeru Minster; Douglas Elliffe; Suresh D Muthukumaraswamy
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.468

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.