Literature DB >> 19228078

An ecological risk assessment for triclosan in the terrestrial environment.

Richard Reiss1, Gavin Lewis, John Griffin.   

Abstract

Triclosan (2,4,4'-trichloro-2'-hydroxydiphenyl ether) is a broad-spectrum bactericide used throughout North America and Europe for a variety of antimicrobial functions. This paper addresses the risk to terrestrial organisms from several potential exposure pathways: Exposure experienced by earthworms, terrestrial plants, and soil microorganisms as the result of the use of sewage sludge containing triclosan as an agricultural soil amendment; secondary exposure by birds and mammals from consumption of earthworms that have been exposed to triclosan in soil; and secondary exposure by birds and mammals from consumption of fish exposed to triclosan as the result of wastewater treatment discharges. The assessment found satisfactory margins of safety for plants, earthworms, birds, fish, mammals, and soil microorganisms. The lowest margins of safety were for nontarget plants (100 for the typical scenario and 8 for the upper-bound scenario). However, these margins of safety are still above the European Union (EU) recommended fivefold assessment value for nontarget plants and are based on cucumber results from a vegetative vigor study conducted in quartz sand that is of limited relevance for risk assessment. In a pre-emergence study conducted in a more relevant soil (sandy loam), cucumbers showed no response to triclosan at the highest dose tested (1,000 microg/kg). A recent study provides limited field measurements of soil and earthworm concentrations. While that study finds higher soil and earthworm concentrations than were estimated in the present study, even these higher concentrations do not indicate significant risks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19228078     DOI: 10.1897/08-250.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  10 in total

Review 1.  Occurrence and toxicity of antimicrobial triclosan and by-products in the environment.

Authors:  Gilles Bedoux; Benoit Roig; Olivier Thomas; Virginie Dupont; Barbara Le Bot
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in Arctic environments: indicator contaminants for assessing local and remote anthropogenic sources in a pristine ecosystem in change.

Authors:  Roland Kallenborn; Eva Brorström-Lundén; Lars-Otto Reiersen; Simon Wilson
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Effect of triclosan on reproduction, DNA damage and heat shock protein gene expression of the earthworm Eisenia fetida.

Authors:  Dasong Lin; Ye Li; Qixing Zhou; Yingming Xu; Di Wang
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Using laboratory-generated biosolids to evaluate the microbial ecotoxicity of triclosan in a simulated land application scenario.

Authors:  Ryan M Holzem; Courtney M Gardner; Heather M Stapleton; Claudia K Gunsch
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Biochemical and life cycle effects of triclosan chronic toxicity to earthworm Eisenia fetida.

Authors:  Jurate Zaltauskaite; Diana Miskelyte
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 6.  Triclosan: current status, occurrence, environmental risks and bioaccumulation potential.

Authors:  Gurpreet Singh Dhillon; Surinder Kaur; Rama Pulicharla; Satinder Kaur Brar; Maximiliano Cledón; Mausam Verma; Rao Y Surampalli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Fate and uptake of pharmaceuticals in soil-plant systems.

Authors:  Laura J Carter; Eleanor Harris; Mike Williams; Jim J Ryan; Rai S Kookana; Alistair B A Boxall
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 5.279

8.  Environmental Exposure to Triclosan and Semen Quality.

Authors:  Wenting Zhu; Hao Zhang; Chuanliang Tong; Chong Xie; Guohua Fan; Shasha Zhao; Xiaogang Yu; Ying Tian; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Impact of Triclosan on Female Reproduction through Reducing Thyroid Hormones to Suppress Hypothalamic Kisspeptin Neurons in Mice.

Authors:  Xin-Yuan Cao; Xu Hua; Jian-Wei Xiong; Wen-Ting Zhu; Jun Zhang; Ling Chen
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 5.639

10.  On the need and speed of regulating triclosan and triclocarban in the United States.

Authors:  Rolf U Halden
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 9.028

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.