Literature DB >> 29411281

Using laboratory-generated biosolids to evaluate the microbial ecotoxicity of triclosan in a simulated land application scenario.

Ryan M Holzem1, Courtney M Gardner2, Heather M Stapleton3, Claudia K Gunsch4.   

Abstract

Land application accounts for approximately 50% of wastewater solids disposal in the USA. Yet, little is known regarding the ecological impacts of many non-regulated chemicals found in biosolids. In most previous studies aimed at assessing ecological impacts, a model biosolid is generated by spiking high concentrations of the target chemical into a soil or biosolid. This approach does not account for the interaction of the chemical of interest with the solids throughout the biosolids production process (a.k.a., aging) which may impact the bioavailability and, thus, ultimate toxicity of the chemical. In the present study, using a lab-scale wastewater and digestion treatment system, we generated biosolids which contained aged triclosan and compared ecological impacts to that of spiked biosolids. Ecotoxicity was assessed based on functional and community structure changes to soil denitrifiers, microorganisms critical to nitrogen cycling. A decrease in denitrifier abundance and diversity was observed in the aged biosolids at concentrations of 17.9 ± 1.93 μg/kg while decreases in activity were observed at 26.9 ± 4.6 μg/kg. In the spiked biosolids treatment, lower denitrifier abundance, diversity, and activity were observed at triclosan (TCS) concentrations of 68.6 ± 26.9 μg/kg. This difference suggests a need to better understand TCS bioavailability dynamics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Anaerobic digestion; Biosolids; Denitrification; Triclosan

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29411281     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-1147-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  54 in total

1.  Use of the T-RFLP technique to assess spatial and temporal changes in the bacterial community structure within an agricultural soil planted with transgenic and non-transgenic potato plants.

Authors: 
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 4.194

2.  Molecular basis of triclosan activity.

Authors:  C W Levy; A Roujeinikova; S Sedelnikova; P J Baker; A R Stuitje; A R Slabas; D W Rice; J B Rafferty
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Environmental antimicrobial contamination from terraccumulation and diffuse pollution pathways.

Authors:  Stephen J Rooklidge
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2004-06-05       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Quantitative detection of the nosZ gene, encoding nitrous oxide reductase, and comparison of the abundances of 16S rRNA, narG, nirK, and nosZ genes in soils.

Authors:  S Henry; D Bru; B Stres; S Hallet; L Philippot
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Effects of selected pharmaceutically active compounds on treatment performance in sequencing batch reactors mimicking wastewater treatment plants operations.

Authors:  Shuyi Wang; Claudia K Gunsch
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 11.236

6.  Terrestrial ecotoxicological effects of the antimicrobial agent triclosan.

Authors:  Feng Liu; Guang-Guo Ying; Li-Hua Yang; Qi-Xing Zhou
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 6.291

7.  Exposure of Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium to triclosan induces a species-specific response, including drug detoxification.

Authors:  Andrew M Bailey; Chrystala Constantinidou; Al Ivens; Mark I Garvey; Mark A Webber; Nick Coldham; Jon L Hobman; John Wain; Martin J Woodward; Laura J V Piddock
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  An ecological risk assessment for triclosan in the terrestrial environment.

Authors:  Richard Reiss; Gavin Lewis; John Griffin
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 3.742

9.  Environmental Exposure of Aquatic and Terrestrial Biota to Triclosan and Triclocarban.

Authors:  Talia E Chalew; Rolf U Halden
Journal:  J Am Water Works Assoc       Date:  2009

10.  The variability of the 16S rRNA gene in bacterial genomes and its consequences for bacterial community analyses.

Authors:  Tomáš Větrovský; Petr Baldrian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.