Literature DB >> 19226119

Intramolecular electron transfer in sulfite-oxidizing enzymes: elucidating the role of a conserved active site arginine.

Safia Emesh1, Trevor D Rapson, Asha Rajapakshe, Ulrike Kappler, Paul V Bernhardt, Gordon Tollin, John H Enemark.   

Abstract

All reported sulfite-oxidizing enzymes have a conserved arginine in their active site which hydrogen bonds to the equatorial oxygen ligand on the Mo atom. Previous studies on the pathogenic R160Q mutant of human sulfite oxidase (HSO) have shown that Mo-heme intramolecular electron transfer (IET) is dramatically slowed when positive charge is lost at this position. To improve our understanding of the function that this conserved positively charged residue plays in IET, we have studied the equivalent uncharged substitutions R55Q and R55M as well as the positively charged substitution R55K in bacterial sulfite dehydrogenase (SDH). The heme and molybdenum cofactor (Moco) subunits are tightly associated in SDH, which makes it an ideal system for improving our understanding of residue function in IET without the added complexity of the interdomain movement that occurs in HSO. Unexpectedly, the uncharged SDH variants (R55Q and R55M) exhibited increased IET rate constants relative to that of the wild type (3-4-fold) when studied by laser flash photolysis. The gain in function observed in SDH(R55Q) and SDH(R55M) suggests that the reduction in the level of IET seen in HSO(R160Q) is not due to a required role of this residue in the IET pathway itself, but to the fact that it plays an important role in heme orientation during the interdomain movement necessary for IET in HSO (as seen in viscosity experiments). The pH profiles of SDH(WT), SDH(R55M), and SDH(R55Q) show that the arginine substitution also alters the behavior of the Mo-heme IET equilibrium (K(eq)) and rate constants (k(et)) of both variants with respect to the SDH(WT) enzyme. SDH(WT) has a k(et) that is independent of pH and a K(eq) that increases as pH decreases; on the other hand, both SDH(R55M) and SDH(R55Q) have a k(et) that increases as pH decreases, and SDH(R55M) has a K(eq) that is pH-independent. IET in the SDH(R55Q) variant is inhibited by sulfate in laser flash photolysis experiments, a behavior that differs from that of SDH(WT), but which also occurs in HSO. IET in SDH(R55K) is slower than in SDH(WT). A new analysis of the possible mechanistic pathways for sulfite-oxidizing enzymes is presented and related to available kinetic and EPR results for these enzymes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19226119      PMCID: PMC2765491          DOI: 10.1021/bi801553q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  37 in total

Review 1.  Electron tunneling through proteins.

Authors:  Harry B Gray; Jay R Winkler
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.318

2.  A voltammetric study of interdomain electron transfer within sulfite oxidase.

Authors:  Sean J Elliott; Anne E McElhaney; Changjian Feng; John H Enemark; Fraser A Armstrong
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2002-10-02       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Molecular basis for enzymatic sulfite oxidation: how three conserved active site residues shape enzyme activity.

Authors:  Susan Bailey; Trevor Rapson; Kayunta Johnson-Winters; Andrei V Astashkin; John H Enemark; Ulrike Kappler
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  Disorders of glutamate metabolism.

Authors:  A Kelly; C A Stanley
Journal:  Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev       Date:  2001

5.  The pH dependence of intramolecular electron transfer rates in sulfite oxidase at high and low anion concentrations.

Authors:  A Pacheco; J T Hazzard; G Tollin; J H Enemark
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.358

6.  Crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of sulfite dehydrogenase from Starkeya novella.

Authors:  Ulrike Kappler; Susan Bailey
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2004-10-20

7.  Molybdenum cofactor deficiency: report of three cases presenting as hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.

Authors:  M Topcu; T Coskun; G Haliloglu; I Saatci
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.987

8.  Proposal for the reclassification of Thiobacillus novellus as Starkeya novella gen. nov., comb. nov., in the alpha-subclass of the Proteobacteria.

Authors:  D P Kelly; I R McDonald; A P Wood
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.747

Review 9.  Sulfite oxidizing enzymes.

Authors:  Changjian Feng; Gordon Tollin; John H Enemark
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2007-03-20

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy in isolated sulfite oxidase deficiency.

Authors:  Chen Hoffmann; Bruria Ben-Zeev; Yair Anikster; Andreea Nissenkorn; Natan Brand; Jacob Kuint; Tammar Kushnir
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.987

View more
  15 in total

1.  Applications of pulsed EPR spectroscopy to structural studies of sulfite oxidizing enzymes().

Authors:  Eric L Klein; Andrei V Astashkin; Arnold M Raitsimring; John H Enemark
Journal:  Coord Chem Rev       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 22.315

Review 2.  The mononuclear molybdenum enzymes.

Authors:  Russ Hille; James Hall; Partha Basu
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Intramolecular electron transfer in sulfite-oxidizing enzymes: probing the role of aromatic amino acids.

Authors:  Asha Rajapakshe; Kimberly T Meyers; Robert E Berry; Gordon Tollin; John H Enemark
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 3.358

Review 4.  Kinetic and thermodynamic effects of mutations of human sulfite oxidase.

Authors:  Asha Rajapakshe; Gordon Tollin; John H Enemark
Journal:  Chem Biodivers       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.408

5.  Structural basis for the oxidation of protein-bound sulfur by the sulfur cycle molybdohemo-enzyme sulfane dehydrogenase SoxCD.

Authors:  Ulrich Zander; Annette Faust; Björn U Klink; Daniele de Sanctis; Santosh Panjikar; Armin Quentmeier; Frank Bardischewsky; Cornelius G Friedrich; Axel J Scheidig
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Implications for the mechanism of sulfite oxidizing enzymes from pulsed EPR spectroscopy and DFT calculations for "difficult" nuclei.

Authors:  John H Enemark; Arnold M Raitsimring; Andrei V Astashkin; Eric L Klein
Journal:  Faraday Discuss       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 4.008

7.  Pulsed EPR investigations of the Mo(V) centers of the R55Q and R55M variants of sulfite dehydrogenase from Starkeya novella.

Authors:  Trevor D Rapson; Andrei V Astashkin; Kayunta Johnson-Winters; Paul V Bernhardt; Ulrike Kappler; Arnold M Raitsimring; John H Enemark
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 3.358

8.  Kinetic results for mutations of conserved residues H304 and R309 of human sulfite oxidase point to mechanistic complexities.

Authors:  Amanda C Davis; Kayunta Johnson-Winters; Anna R Arnold; Gordon Tollin; John H Enemark
Journal:  Metallomics       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.526

9.  Exchangeable oxygens in the vicinity of the molybdenum center of the high-pH form of sulfite oxidase and sulfite dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Andrei V Astashkin; Eric L Klein; Dmitry Ganyushin; Kayunta Johnson-Winters; Frank Neese; Ulrike Kappler; John H Enemark
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 3.676

Review 10.  Steering electrons on moving pathways.

Authors:  David N Beratan; Spiros S Skourtis; Ilya A Balabin; Alexander Balaeff; Shahar Keinan; Ravindra Venkatramani; Dequan Xiao
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 22.384

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.