Literature DB >> 17459792

Sulfite oxidizing enzymes.

Changjian Feng1, Gordon Tollin, John H Enemark.   

Abstract

Sulfite oxidizing enzymes are essential mononuclear molybdenum (Mo) proteins involved in sulfur metabolism of animals, plants and bacteria. There are three such enzymes presently known: (1) sulfite oxidase (SO) in animals, (2) SO in plants, and (3) sulfite dehydrogenase (SDH) in bacteria. X-ray crystal structures of enzymes from all three sources (chicken SO, Arabidopsis thaliana SO, and Starkeya novella SDH) show nearly identical square pyramidal coordination around the Mo atom, even though the overall structures of the proteins and the presence of additional cofactors vary. This structural information provides a molecular basis for studying the role of specific amino acids in catalysis. Animal SO catalyzes the final step in the degradation of sulfur-containing amino acids and is critical in detoxifying excess sulfite. Human SO deficiency is a fatal genetic disorder that leads to early death, and impaired SO activity is implicated in sulfite neurotoxicity. Animal SO and bacterial SDH contain both Mo and heme domains, whereas plant SO only has the Mo domain. Intraprotein electron transfer (IET) between the Mo and Fe centers in animal SO and bacterial SDH is a key step in the catalysis, which can be studied by laser flash photolysis in the presence of deazariboflavin. IET studies on animal SO and bacterial SDH clearly demonstrate the similarities and differences between these two types of sulfite oxidizing enzymes. Conformational change is involved in the IET of animal SO, in which electrostatic interactions may play a major role in guiding the docking of the heme domain to the Mo domain prior to electron transfer. In contrast, IET measurements for SDH demonstrate that IET occurs directly through the protein medium, which is distinctly different from that in animal SO. Point mutations in human SO can result in significantly impaired IET or no IET, thus rationalizing their fatal effects. The recent developments in our understanding of sulfite oxidizing enzyme mechanisms that are driven by a combination of molecular biology, rapid kinetics, pulsed electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), and computational techniques are the subject of this review.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17459792      PMCID: PMC1993547          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2007.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta        ISSN: 0006-3002


  81 in total

1.  In vitro incorporation of nascent molybdenum cofactor into human sulfite oxidase.

Authors:  S Leimkühler; K V Rajagopalan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-10-20       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Isolated sulfite oxidase deficiency: identification of 12 novel SUOX mutations in 10 patients.

Authors:  Jean L Johnson; Katharine E Coyne; Robert M Garrett; Marie-Therese Zabot; Claude Dorche; Caroline Kisker; K V Rajagopalan
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.878

3.  Molecular cloning of human liver sulfite oxidase.

Authors:  R M Garrett; D B Bellissimo; K V Rajagopalan
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1995-06-09

4.  Purification and properties of sulfite oxidase from chicken liver. Presence of molybdenum in sulfite oxidase from diverse sources.

Authors:  D L Kessler; K V Rajagopalan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1972-10-25       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Cell biology of molybdenum.

Authors:  Ralf R Mendel; Florian Bittner
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2006-05-12

6.  A sulfurtransferase is required in the transfer of cysteine sulfur in the in vitro synthesis of molybdopterin from precursor Z in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  S Leimkühler; K V Rajagopalan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-04-04       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  The pH dependence of intramolecular electron transfer rates in sulfite oxidase at high and low anion concentrations.

Authors:  A Pacheco; J T Hazzard; G Tollin; J H Enemark
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.358

8.  Pulsed ELDOR spectroscopy of the Mo(V)/Fe(III) state of sulfite oxidase prepared by one-electron reduction with Ti(III) citrate.

Authors:  Rachel Codd; Andrei V Astashkin; Andrew Pacheco; Arnold M Raitsimring; John H Enemark
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2001-11-08       Impact factor: 3.358

9.  Rescue of lethal molybdenum cofactor deficiency by a biosynthetic precursor from Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Günter Schwarz; José Angel Santamaria-Araujo; Stefan Wolf; Heon-Jin Lee; Ibrahim M Adham; Hermann-Josef Gröne; Herbert Schwegler; Jörn Oliver Sass; Tanja Otte; Petra Hänzelmann; Ralf R Mendel; Wolfgang Engel; Jochen Reiss
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2004-04-28       Impact factor: 6.150

10.  Genetic studies of a cluster of acute lymphoblastic leukemia cases in Churchill County, Nevada.

Authors:  Karen K Steinberg; Mary V Relling; Margaret L Gallagher; Christopher N Greene; Carol S Rubin; Deborah French; Adrianne K Holmes; William L Carroll; Deborah A Koontz; Eric J Sampson; Glen A Satten
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  58 in total

Review 1.  The Role of Oxidative Stress and Bioenergetic Dysfunction in Sulfite Oxidase Deficiency: Insights from Animal Models.

Authors:  Angela T S Wyse; Mateus Grings; Moacir Wajner; Guilhian Leipnitz
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.911

2.  Role of an isoform-specific substrate access channel residue in CO ligand accessibilities of neuronal and inducible nitric oxide synthase isoforms.

Authors:  Changjian Feng; Weihong Fan; Dipak K Ghosh; Gordon Tollin
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2010-12-10

3.  Aerobic degradation of mercaptosuccinate by the gram-negative bacterium Variovorax paradoxus strain B4.

Authors:  Irma Carbajal-Rodríguez; Nadine Stöveken; Barbara Satola; Jan Hendrik Wübbeler; Alexander Steinbüchel
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Molecular basis for enzymatic sulfite oxidation: how three conserved active site residues shape enzyme activity.

Authors:  Susan Bailey; Trevor Rapson; Kayunta Johnson-Winters; Andrei V Astashkin; John H Enemark; Ulrike Kappler
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Molybdenum cofactors, enzymes and pathways.

Authors:  Günter Schwarz; Ralf R Mendel; Markus W Ribbe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Shifting the metallocentric molybdoenzyme paradigm: the importance of pyranopterin coordination.

Authors:  Richard A Rothery; Joel H Weiner
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.358

7.  Applications of pulsed EPR spectroscopy to structural studies of sulfite oxidizing enzymes().

Authors:  Eric L Klein; Andrei V Astashkin; Arnold M Raitsimring; John H Enemark
Journal:  Coord Chem Rev       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 22.315

8.  YedY: A Mononuclear Molybdenum Enzyme with a Redox-Active Ligand?

Authors:  Chi Chung Lee; Nathaniel S Sickerman; Yilin Hu; Markus W Ribbe
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.164

9.  Pulsed EPR investigations of the Mo(V) centers of the R55Q and R55M variants of sulfite dehydrogenase from Starkeya novella.

Authors:  Trevor D Rapson; Andrei V Astashkin; Kayunta Johnson-Winters; Paul V Bernhardt; Ulrike Kappler; Arnold M Raitsimring; John H Enemark
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 3.358

10.  Kinetic results for mutations of conserved residues H304 and R309 of human sulfite oxidase point to mechanistic complexities.

Authors:  Amanda C Davis; Kayunta Johnson-Winters; Anna R Arnold; Gordon Tollin; John H Enemark
Journal:  Metallomics       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.