Literature DB >> 10690982

Somatosensory potentials, CSF creatine kinase BB activity, and awakening after cardiac arrest.

A L Sherman1, D L Tirschwell, P J Micklesen, W T Longstreth, L R Robinson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the utility of somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) peaks and CSF creatine kinase BB isoenzyme activity (CKBB) in predicting nonawakening from coma due to cardiac arrest.
BACKGROUND: Accurate predictors of neurologic outcome in patients comatose after cardiac arrest are needed to improve medical decision making.
METHODS: A total of 72 comatose patients had bilateral median SEPs, and of these, 52 had CSF and CKBB. Awakening was defined as following commands or having comprehensible speech. Both short (N1) and long (N3) latency SEP peaks were analyzed. Nonparametric analyses were used.
RESULTS: For patients who had both tests, CKBB > or = 205 U/L predicted nonawakening with a sensitivity of 49% and a specificity of 100%. Bilateral absence of the N1 peak predicted nonawakening with a sensitivity of 53% and a specificity of 100%. Using CKBB > or = 205 U/L, bilaterally absent SEP N1 peaks, or both predicted nonawakening with a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 100%. Using CKBB > or = 205 U/L, bilaterally absent N1 peaks, bilateral N3 > or = 176 msec or absent, or some combination predicted nonawakening with a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 100%.
CONCLUSION: The combination of an absent N1 peak and elevated CKBB performs better than either alone in predicting nonawakening after cardiac arrest. Prolonged or absent N3 latency may increase sensitivity. These results should be interpreted with caution given the small number of patients and the possibility of a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10690982     DOI: 10.1212/wnl.54.4.889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  9 in total

Review 1.  Are somatosensory evoked potentials the best predictor of outcome after severe brain injury? A systematic review.

Authors:  B G Carter; W Butt
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  [Early evaluation of neurological prognosis and therapy after cardiopulmonary resuscitation: current opportunities and clinical implications].

Authors:  A Ragoschke-Schumm; R Pfeifer; G Marx; N Knoepffler; O W Witte; S Isenmann
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 3.  Post-anoxic vegetative state: imaging and prognostic perspectives.

Authors:  Mario Stanziano; Carolina Foglia; Andrea Soddu; Francesca Gargano; Michele Papa
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2011 Jan-Mar

Review 4.  Complement inhibition as a proposed neuroprotective strategy following cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Brad E Zacharia; Zachary L Hickman; Bartosz T Grobelny; Peter A DeRosa; Andrew F Ducruet; E Sander Connolly
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 4.711

5.  Neurologic Prognostication After Cardiac Arrest Using Brain Biomarkers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ryan L Hoiland; Kiran J K Rikhraj; Sharanjit Thiara; Christopher Fordyce; Andreas H Kramer; Markus B Skrifvars; Cheryl L Wellington; Donald E Griesdale; Nicholas A Fergusson; Mypinder S Sekhon
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 29.907

6.  Does stimulus rate matter when performing somatosensory evoked potentials for coma patients?

Authors:  Lawrence R Robinson; Paula J Micklesen
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  Predictive value of neurological examination for early cortical responses to somatosensory evoked potentials in patients with postanoxic coma.

Authors:  Aline Bouwes; Jan M Binnekade; Bart W Verbaan; Eveline G J Zandbergen; Johannes H T M Koelman; Henry C Weinstein; Albert Hijdra; Janneke Horn
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Functional and Prognostic Assessment in Comatose Patients: A Study Using Somatosensory Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Andrea Victoria Arciniegas-Villanueva; Eva María Fernández-Diaz; Emilio Gonzalez-Garcìa; Javier Sancho-Pelluz; David Mansilla-Lozano; Tomás Segura
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 3.473

Review 9.  Monitoring biomarkers of cellular injury and death in acute brain injury.

Authors:  Sherry H-Y Chou; Claudia S Robertson
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.210

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.