Literature DB >> 19222564

Musical experience and neural efficiency: effects of training on subcortical processing of vocal expressions of emotion.

Dana L Strait1, Nina Kraus, Erika Skoe, Richard Ashley.   

Abstract

Musicians exhibit enhanced perception of emotion in speech, although the biological foundations for this advantage remain unconfirmed. In order to gain a better understanding for the influences of musical experience on neural processing of emotionally salient sounds, we recorded brainstem potentials to affective human vocal sounds. Musicians showed enhanced time-domain response magnitude to the most spectrally complex portion of the stimulus and decreased magnitude to the more periodic, less complex portion. Enhanced phase-locking to stimulus periodicity was likewise seen in musicians' responses to the complex portion. These results suggest that auditory expertise engenders both enhancement and efficiency of subcortical neural responses that are intricately connected with acoustic features important for the communication of emotional states. Our findings provide the first biological evidence for behavioral observations indicating that musical training enhances the perception of vocally expressed emotion in addition to establishing a subcortical role in the auditory processing of emotional cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19222564     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06617.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  74 in total

1.  Human inferior colliculus activity relates to individual differences in spoken language learning.

Authors:  Bharath Chandrasekaran; Nina Kraus; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Emotional expressions in voice and music: same code, same effect?

Authors:  Nicolas Escoffier; Jidan Zhong; Annett Schirmer; Anqi Qiu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Effects of musicality and motivational orientation on auditory category learning: a test of a regulatory-fit hypothesis.

Authors:  J Devin McAuley; Molly J Henry; Alan Wedd; Timothy J Pleskac; Joseph Cesario
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-02

4.  Enhanced brainstem encoding predicts musicians' perceptual advantages with pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Musical experience limits the degradative effects of background noise on the neural processing of sound.

Authors:  Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Stimulus rate and subcortical auditory processing of speech.

Authors:  Jennifer L Krizman; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 1.854

7.  Training to improve hearing speech in noise: biological mechanisms.

Authors:  Judy H Song; Erika Skoe; Karen Banai; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Connectivity patterns during music listening: Evidence for action-based processing in musicians.

Authors:  Vinoo Alluri; Petri Toiviainen; Iballa Burunat; Marina Kliuchko; Peter Vuust; Elvira Brattico
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Reading and subcortical auditory function.

Authors:  Karen Banai; Jane Hornickel; Erika Skoe; Trent Nicol; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 10.  Auditory brain stem response to complex sounds: a tutorial.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.