Literature DB >> 19219435

[Genome-wide expression profiling as a clinical tool: are we there yet?].

F C Geyer1, T Decker, J S Reis-Filho.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease, encompassing a plethora of histological types and clinical courses. Current histopathological classification systems for breast cancer are based on descriptive entities that are of prognostic significance. Few prognostic markers beyond those offered by histopathological analysis are available. Furthermore, a very limited armamentarium of predictive biomarkers has been introduced in clinical practice. High throughput molecular technologies are reshaping our understanding of breast cancer, of which microarray-based gene expression has received the most attention. This method has been successfully used to derive a molecular taxonomy for breast cancer, which has provided interesting insights into the biology of the disease. Microarray-based class prediction studies have generated a multitude of prognostic/predictive signatures. Although these signatures have not been fully translated to clinical practice as yet, they herald the promise of an improvement in breast cancer treatment decision-making. It should be noted, however, that most of the signatures developed to date seem to have discriminatory power almost restricted to oestrogen receptor-positive disease. This review addresses the contribution of gene expression profiling to our understanding of breast cancer and its clinical management and what has yet to be done for these classifiers to be incorporated in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19219435     DOI: 10.1007/s00292-008-1104-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathologe        ISSN: 0172-8113            Impact factor:   1.011


  89 in total

1.  Microarrays--the 21st century divining rod?

Authors:  Y D He; S H Friend
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Development and clinical utility of a 21-gene recurrence score prognostic assay in patients with early breast cancer treated with tamoxifen.

Authors:  Soonmyung Paik
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2007-06

3.  Morphological and immunophenotypic analysis of breast carcinomas with basal and myoepithelial differentiation.

Authors:  E A Rakha; T C Putti; D M Abd El-Rehim; C Paish; A R Green; D G Powe; A H Lee; J F Robertson; I O Ellis
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.996

4.  Robustness, scalability, and integration of a wound-response gene expression signature in predicting breast cancer survival.

Authors:  Howard Y Chang; Dimitry S A Nuyten; Julie B Sneddon; Trevor Hastie; Robert Tibshirani; Therese Sørlie; Hongyue Dai; Yudong D He; Laura J van't Veer; Harry Bartelink; Matt van de Rijn; Patrick O Brown; Marc J van de Vijver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Martine J Piccart-Gebhart; Marion Procter; Brian Leyland-Jones; Aron Goldhirsch; Michael Untch; Ian Smith; Luca Gianni; Jose Baselga; Richard Bell; Christian Jackisch; David Cameron; Mitch Dowsett; Carlos H Barrios; Günther Steger; Chiun-Shen Huang; Michael Andersson; Moshe Inbar; Mikhail Lichinitser; István Láng; Ulrike Nitz; Hiroji Iwata; Christoph Thomssen; Caroline Lohrisch; Thomas M Suter; Josef Rüschoff; Tamás Suto; Victoria Greatorex; Carol Ward; Carolyn Straehle; Eleanor McFadden; M Stella Dolci; Richard D Gelber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Stromal gene expression predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer.

Authors:  Greg Finak; Nicholas Bertos; Francois Pepin; Svetlana Sadekova; Margarita Souleimanova; Hong Zhao; Haiying Chen; Gulbeyaz Omeroglu; Sarkis Meterissian; Atilla Omeroglu; Michael Hallett; Morag Park
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2008-04-27       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  Extracellular matrix signature identifies breast cancer subgroups with different clinical outcome.

Authors:  A Bergamaschi; E Tagliabue; T Sørlie; B Naume; T Triulzi; R Orlandi; H G Russnes; J M Nesland; R Tammi; P Auvinen; V-M Kosma; S Ménard; A-L Børresen-Dale
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 7.996

8.  Identification of conserved gene expression features between murine mammary carcinoma models and human breast tumors.

Authors:  Jason I Herschkowitz; Karl Simin; Victor J Weigman; Igor Mikaelian; Jerry Usary; Zhiyuan Hu; Karen E Rasmussen; Laundette P Jones; Shahin Assefnia; Subhashini Chandrasekharan; Michael G Backlund; Yuzhi Yin; Andrey I Khramtsov; Roy Bastein; John Quackenbush; Robert I Glazer; Powel H Brown; Jeffrey E Green; Levy Kopelovich; Priscilla A Furth; Juan P Palazzo; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Philip S Bernard; Gary A Churchill; Terry Van Dyke; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Gene expression signature of fibroblast serum response predicts human cancer progression: similarities between tumors and wounds.

Authors:  Howard Y Chang; Julie B Sneddon; Ash A Alizadeh; Ruchira Sood; Rob B West; Kelli Montgomery; Jen-Tsan Chi; Matt van de Rijn; David Botstein; Patrick O Brown
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Identification of a gene signature in cell cycle pathway for breast cancer prognosis using gene expression profiling data.

Authors:  Jiangang Liu; Andrew Campen; Shuguang Huang; Sheng-Bin Peng; Xiang Ye; Mathew Palakal; A Keith Dunker; Yuni Xia; Shuyu Li
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 3.063

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  From Multi-Omics Approaches to Precision Medicine in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Authors:  Giovanna Morello; Salvatore Salomone; Velia D'Agata; Francesca Luisa Conforti; Sebastiano Cavallaro
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 4.677

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.