Literature DB >> 16429394

Morphological and immunophenotypic analysis of breast carcinomas with basal and myoepithelial differentiation.

E A Rakha1, T C Putti, D M Abd El-Rehim, C Paish, A R Green, D G Powe, A H Lee, J F Robertson, I O Ellis.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the morphological characteristics and immunohistochemical profile of breast carcinomas with basal and myoepithelial phenotypes to obtain a better understanding of their biological behaviour and nature. One thousand nine hundred and forty-four invasive breast carcinomas were examined, using tissue microarray (TMA) technology and immunohistochemistry, to identify those tumours that showed basal and myoepithelial phenotypes, and their immunophenotype profile was characterized using a variety of markers. In addition, haematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of these tumours were studied for several morphological parameters. The findings were correlated with patient and tumour characteristics and outcome data. Tumours were classified into two groups: (1) tumours with basal phenotype [expressing one or both basal markers (CK5/6 and/or CK14)] and (2) tumours with myoepithelial phenotype (expressing SMA and/or p63). Group 1 was further subdivided into two subgroups: (A) dominant basal pattern (more than 50% of cells positive) and (B) basal characteristics (10-50% of cells positive). Group 1 tumours constituted 18.6% (8.6% and 10% for groups 1A and 1B, respectively) and group 2 constituted 13.7% of the cases. In both groups, the most common histological types were ductal/no specific type, tubular mixed and medullary-like carcinomas; the majority of these tumours were grade 3. There were positive associations with adenoid cystic growth pattern, loss of tubule formation, marked cellular pleomorphism, poorer Nottingham prognostic index, and development of distant metastasis. In addition, associations were found with loss of expression of steroid hormone receptors and FHIT proteins and positive expression of p53 and EGFR. The most common characteristics in group 1 were larger size, high-grade comedo-type necrosis, development of tumour recurrence, and absence of lymph node disease. Group 2 tumours were more common in younger patients and were associated with central acellular zones, basaloid change, and positive E-cadherin protein expression. Group 1 characteristics were associated with both reduced overall survival (OS) [log rank (LR) = 22.5, p < 0.001] and reduced disease-free interval (DFI) (LR = 30.1, p < 0.001), while group 2 characteristics showed an association with OS (LR = 5, p = 0.02) but not with DFI. Multivariate analysis showed that basal, but not myoepithelial, phenotype has an independent value in predicting outcome. Breast cancers with basal and myoepithelial phenotypes are distinct groups of tumours that share some common morphological features and an association with poor prognosis. The basal rather than the myoepithelial phenotype has the strongest relationship with patient outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16429394     DOI: 10.1002/path.1916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol        ISSN: 0022-3417            Impact factor:   7.996


  79 in total

Review 1.  Histological types of breast cancer: how special are they?

Authors:  Britta Weigelt; Felipe C Geyer; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 2.  Triple-negative breast cancer: present challenges and new perspectives.

Authors:  Franca Podo; Lutgarde M C Buydens; Hadassa Degani; Riet Hilhorst; Edda Klipp; Ingrid S Gribbestad; Sabine Van Huffel; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Jan Luts; Daniel Monleon; Geert J Postma; Nicole Schneiderhan-Marra; Filippo Santoro; Hans Wouters; Hege G Russnes; Therese Sørlie; Elda Tagliabue; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 3.  The molecular pathology of breast cancer progression.

Authors:  Alessandro Bombonati; Dennis C Sgroi
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 7.996

4.  [Basal and myoepithelial phenotype of metastatic mammary carcinomas. A prognostic factor in the palliative situation?].

Authors:  P Mainka; S Kahlert; T Kirchner; D Mayr; J Diebold
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.011

5.  Chromosomal changes in aggressive breast cancers with basal-like features.

Authors:  Wayne Yu; Yasmine Kanaan; Young Kyung Bae; Young-Kyung Baed; Edward Gabrielson
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  2009-08

6.  Identification of molecular phenotypes in canine mammary carcinomas with clinical implications: application of the human classification.

Authors:  A Gama; A Alves; F Schmitt
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2008-08-02       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 7.  Treatment options for patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Rafael Santana-Davila; Edith A Perez
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 17.388

8.  Triple negative breast cancer - our experience and review.

Authors:  S Krishnamurthy; R Poornima; Vasu Reddy Challa; Y G Basavana Goud
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-02-25

Review 9.  Histological and molecular types of breast cancer: is there a unifying taxonomy?

Authors:  Britta Weigelt; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 66.675

10.  Molecular characteristics of screen-detected vs symptomatic breast cancers and their impact on survival.

Authors:  S J Dawson; S W Duffy; F M Blows; K E Driver; E Provenzano; J LeQuesne; D C Greenberg; P Pharoah; C Caldas; G C Wishart
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.