Literature DB >> 19219396

The basic pacing rate in CRT patients: the higher the better?

Frederik Voss1, Ruediger Becker, Melanie Hauck, Hugo A Katus, Alexander Bauer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To maximize the hemodynamic benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), echocardiographic AV interval optimization is routinely performed, complemented by VV interval optimization especially in non-responders. Programming of the basic pacing rate, however, is largely empirical in these patients. Therefore, the present study aimed to systematically evaluate the impact of basic pacing rate on hemodynamic parameters in CRT patients with sinus bradycardia. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We included 70 consecutive patients with moderate to severe heart failure, LV ejection fraction <or=35%, left bundle branch block or a QRS duration >120 ms combined with echocardiographic evidence of ventricular dyssynchrony. All patients were on optimal heart failure medication, with CRT-ICD devices implanted at least 6 months before inclusion into the study. All patients were in sinus rhythm with a spontaneous heart rate <40 bpm. In all patients, cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume (SV) were determined using electrical velocimetry (EV) (Aesculon, Osypka Medical, Berlin, Germany). EV provides a new algorithm to calculate CO based on variations in thoracic electrical bioimpedance, which has been recently validated. Hemodynamic measurements were performed at four different pacing rates ranging from 40 to 70 bpm. A stepwise increase in CO was encountered with increasing heart rates, reaching statistical significance when comparing 70 with 40 bpm. SV remained unchanged throughout all pacing rates.
CONCLUSIONS: In the range between 40 and 70 bpm, an increase in basic pacing rate enhances CO without reducing SV. According to this pilot study, a basic pacing rate between 60 and 70 bpm would appear reasonable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19219396     DOI: 10.1007/s00392-009-0745-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol        ISSN: 1861-0684            Impact factor:   5.460


  10 in total

1.  Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure.

Authors:  William T Abraham; Westby G Fisher; Andrew L Smith; David B Delurgio; Angel R Leon; Evan Loh; Dusan Z Kocovic; Milton Packer; Alfredo L Clavell; David L Hayes; Myrvin Ellestad; Robin J Trupp; Jackie Underwood; Faith Pickering; Cindy Truex; Peggy McAtee; John Messenger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-06-13       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure.

Authors:  William T Abraham; David L Hayes
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-11-25       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Long-term variations in optimal programming of cardiac resynchronization therapy devices.

Authors:  D O'Donnell; V Nadurata; A Hamer; P Kertes; U Mohamed; W Mohammed
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.976

4.  Right atrial pacing impairs cardiac function during resynchronization therapy: acute effects of DDD pacing compared to VDD pacing.

Authors:  Alain Bernheim; Peter Ammann; Christian Sticherling; Peter Burger; Beat Schaer; Hans Peter Brunner-La Rocca; Jens Eckstein; Stephanie Kiencke; Christoph Kaiser; Andre Linka; Peter Buser; Matthias Pfisterer; Stefan Osswald
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Comparison of electrical velocimetry and transoesophageal Doppler echocardiography for measuring stroke volume and cardiac output.

Authors:  C Schmidt; G Theilmeier; H Van Aken; P Korsmeier; S P Wirtz; E Berendes; A Hoffmeier; A Meissner
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2005-09-09       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Effects of chronotropic incompetence and beta-blocker use on the exercise treadmill test in men.

Authors:  A J Gauri; V K Raxwal; L Roux; W F Fearon; V F Froelicher
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Optimizing the AV delay in DDD pacemaker patients with high degree AV block: mitral valve Doppler versus impedance cardiography.

Authors:  M Kindermann; G Fröhlig; T Doerr; H Schieffer
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.976

8.  Heart rate and cardiac rhythm relationships with bisoprolol benefit in chronic heart failure in CIBIS II Trial.

Authors:  P Lechat; J S Hulot; S Escolano; A Mallet; A Leizorovicz; M Werhlen-Grandjean; G Pochmalicki; H Dargie
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-03-13       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Effect of pacing chamber and atrioventricular delay on acute systolic function of paced patients with congestive heart failure. The Pacing Therapies for Congestive Heart Failure Study Group. The Guidant Congestive Heart Failure Research Group.

Authors:  A Auricchio; C Stellbrink; M Block; S Sack; J Vogt; P Bakker; H Klein; A Kramer; J Ding; R Salo; B Tockman; T Pochet; J Spinelli
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Effects of multisite biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay.

Authors:  S Cazeau; C Leclercq; T Lavergne; S Walker; C Varma; C Linde; S Garrigue; L Kappenberger; G A Haywood; M Santini; C Bailleul; J C Daubert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-03-22       Impact factor: 91.245

  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  AV interval optimization using pressure volume loops in dual chamber pacemaker patients with maintained systolic left ventricular function.

Authors:  Frank Eberhardt; Thorsten Hanke; Joern Fitschen; Matthias Heringlake; Frank Bode; Heribert Schunkert; Uwe K H Wiegand
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Hotlines and clinical trial updates presented at the European Society of Cardiology Meeting 2009: data from RE-LY, PLATO, MADIT-CRT, PROTECT, SYNTAX, TRITON and more.

Authors:  S H Schirmer; A M van der Laan; M Böhm; F Mahfoud
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  A comparative evaluation of electrical velocimetry and inert gas rebreathing for the non-invasive assessment of cardiac output.

Authors:  Frederik Trinkmann; Manuel Berger; Ursula Hoffmann; Martin Borggrefe; Jens J Kaden; Joachim Saur
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  Comparison of electrical velocimetry and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the non-invasive determination of cardiac output.

Authors:  Frederik Trinkmann; Manuel Berger; Christina Doesch; Theano Papavassiliu; Stefan O Schoenberg; Martin Borggrefe; Jens J Kaden; Joachim Saur
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Electrical velocimetry as a tool for measuring cardiac output in small infants after heart surgery.

Authors:  Oswin Grollmuss; Serge Demontoux; André Capderou; Alain Serraf; Emre Belli
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Baseline vectorcardiography as a predictor of invasively determined acute hemodynamic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Thomas Schau; Walter Koglek; Josef Brandl; Martin Seifert; Jürgen Meyhöfer; Michael Neuss; Georg Grimm; Robert Bitschnau; Christian Butter
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 5.460

7.  Optimal Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Pacing Rate in Non-Ischemic Heart Failure Patients: A Randomized Crossover Pilot Trial.

Authors:  Adam Ali Ghotbi; Mikael Sander; Lars Køber; Berit Th Philbert; Finn Gustafsson; Christoffer Hagemann; Andreas Kjær; Peter K Jacobsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effect of increasing heart rate on finger photoplethysmography fitness index (PPGF) in subjects with implanted cardiac pacemakers.

Authors:  Amilia Aminuddin; Isabella Tan; Mark Butlin; Alberto P Avolio; Hosen Kiat; Edward Barin; Nor Anita Megat Mohd Nordin; Kalaivani Chellappan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.