OBJECTIVES: During extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), drug disposition changes significantly. Plasma concentrations are altered due to an expanded circulating volume leading to a decreased elimination. In addition, adsorption and sequestration of drugs by the ECMO circuit components may further alter pharmacokinetics. Treating patients during the ECMO period with antifungals is difficult. Loss in the ECMO circuit can potentially result in sub-therapeutic levels. METHODS: Two cases are presented in which caspofungin and voriconazole levels and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined during the ECMO period. RESULTS: Mean caspofungin trough and peak levels were 3.73 and 11.95 microg/mL. These are comparable to previously reported ones. Also pharmacokinetic parameters were identical to those reported in the literature. It seems that caspofungin is not sequestrated by the ECMO circuit, which is expected based on its low log P value. During the first days of ECMO therapy, voriconazole trough and peak levels did not differ much from those determined prior to ECMO therapy. However, at the start of ECMO therapy, the voriconazole dose was increased from 280 to 400 mg twice daily as loss due to binding to the circuit was expected. This increase was not immediately reflected in higher voriconazole levels, which may be due to drug sequestration by the circuit. However, the voriconazole half-life was extended up to 20 h in our patient. Two days after the dose increase, levels reached troughs >10 microg/mL and peaks of around 15 microg/mL, exceeding the therapeutic interval for voriconazole. This can possibly be explained by the saturation of binding sites on the ECMO circuit. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that adequate caspofungin plasma levels are maintained during ECMO. In the case of voriconazole, it is recommended to monitor plasma levels to ensure efficacy and avoid toxicity.
OBJECTIVES: During extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), drug disposition changes significantly. Plasma concentrations are altered due to an expanded circulating volume leading to a decreased elimination. In addition, adsorption and sequestration of drugs by the ECMO circuit components may further alter pharmacokinetics. Treating patients during the ECMO period with antifungals is difficult. Loss in the ECMO circuit can potentially result in sub-therapeutic levels. METHODS: Two cases are presented in which caspofungin and voriconazole levels and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined during the ECMO period. RESULTS: Mean caspofungin trough and peak levels were 3.73 and 11.95 microg/mL. These are comparable to previously reported ones. Also pharmacokinetic parameters were identical to those reported in the literature. It seems that caspofungin is not sequestrated by the ECMO circuit, which is expected based on its low log P value. During the first days of ECMO therapy, voriconazole trough and peak levels did not differ much from those determined prior to ECMO therapy. However, at the start of ECMO therapy, the voriconazole dose was increased from 280 to 400 mg twice daily as loss due to binding to the circuit was expected. This increase was not immediately reflected in higher voriconazole levels, which may be due to drug sequestration by the circuit. However, the voriconazole half-life was extended up to 20 h in our patient. Two days after the dose increase, levels reached troughs >10 microg/mL and peaks of around 15 microg/mL, exceeding the therapeutic interval for voriconazole. This can possibly be explained by the saturation of binding sites on the ECMO circuit. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that adequate caspofungin plasma levels are maintained during ECMO. In the case of voriconazole, it is recommended to monitor plasma levels to ensure efficacy and avoid toxicity.
Authors: I Spriet; K Cosaert; M Renard; A Uyttebroeck; I Meyts; M Proesmans; G Meyfroidt; J de Hoon; R Verbesselt; L Willems Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2010-10-21 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: S Kurland; M Furebring; E Löwdin; E Eliasson; E I Nielsen; J Sjölin Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2019-05-24 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Chin Fen Neoh; Jovan Jacob; Lok Leung; Jian Li; Angela Stathopoulos; Kay Stewart; David C M Kong Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2012-04-02 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Enno D Wildschut; Annewil van Saet; Pavla Pokorna; Maurice J Ahsman; John N Van den Anker; Dick Tibboel Journal: Pediatr Clin North Am Date: 2012-08-29 Impact factor: 3.278