INTRODUCTION: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARgamma) is an important regulator of lipid metabolism; it controls the differentiation of preadipocytes and is also found at high levels in small metastatic tumors. In this report, we describe the radiochemical synthesis and evaluation of two (18)F-labeled analogs of the potent and selective PPARgamma agonist farglitazar. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The isomeric aromatic fluorine-substituted target compounds [(2S)-(2-benzoylphenylamino)-3-(4-(2-[2-(4-[(18)F]fluorophenyl)-5-methyloxazol-4-yl]ethoxy)-phenyl)propionic acid ([(18)F]-1) and (2S)-[2-(4-fluorobenzoyl)phenylamino]-3-(4-[2-(5-methyl-2-phenyloxazol-4-yl)ethoxy]-phenyl)propionic acid ([(18)F]-2)] were prepared in fluorine-18-labeled form, respectively, by radiofluorination of an iodonium salt precursor or by Ullmann-type condensation with 2-iodo-4'-[(18)F]fluorobenzophenone after nucleophilic aromatic substitution with [(18)F]fluoride ion. Each compound was obtained in high specific activity and good radiochemical yield. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: (18)F-1 and (18)F-2 have high and selective PPARgamma binding affinities comparable to that of the parent molecule farglitazar, and they were found to have good metabolic stability. Tissue biodistribution studies of (18)F-1 and (18)F-2 were conducted, but PPARgamma-mediated uptake of both agents was minimal. CONCLUSION: This study completes our first look at an important class of PPARgamma ligands as potential positron emission tomography (PET) imaging agents for breast cancer and vascular disease. Although (18)F-1 and (18)F-2 have high affinities for PPARgamma and good metabolic stability, their poor target-tissue distribution properties, which likely reflect their high lipophilicity combined with the low titer of PPARgamma in target tissues, indicate that they have limited potential as PPARgamma PET imaging agents.
INTRODUCTION:Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARgamma) is an important regulator of lipid metabolism; it controls the differentiation of preadipocytes and is also found at high levels in small metastatic tumors. In this report, we describe the radiochemical synthesis and evaluation of two (18)F-labeled analogs of the potent and selective PPARgamma agonist farglitazar. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The isomeric aromatic fluorine-substituted target compounds [(2S)-(2-benzoylphenylamino)-3-(4-(2-[2-(4-[(18)F]fluorophenyl)-5-methyloxazol-4-yl]ethoxy)-phenyl)propionic acid ([(18)F]-1) and (2S)-[2-(4-fluorobenzoyl)phenylamino]-3-(4-[2-(5-methyl-2-phenyloxazol-4-yl)ethoxy]-phenyl)propionic acid ([(18)F]-2)] were prepared in fluorine-18-labeled form, respectively, by radiofluorination of an iodonium salt precursor or by Ullmann-type condensation with 2-iodo-4'-[(18)F]fluorobenzophenone after nucleophilic aromatic substitution with [(18)F]fluoride ion. Each compound was obtained in high specific activity and good radiochemical yield. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: (18)F-1 and (18)F-2 have high and selective PPARgamma binding affinities comparable to that of the parent molecule farglitazar, and they were found to have good metabolic stability. Tissue biodistribution studies of (18)F-1 and (18)F-2 were conducted, but PPARgamma-mediated uptake of both agents was minimal. CONCLUSION: This study completes our first look at an important class of PPARgamma ligands as potential positron emission tomography (PET) imaging agents for breast cancer and vascular disease. Although (18)F-1 and (18)F-2 have high affinities for PPARgamma and good metabolic stability, their poor target-tissue distribution properties, which likely reflect their high lipophilicity combined with the low titer of PPARgamma in target tissues, indicate that they have limited potential as PPARgamma PET imaging agents.
Authors: T M Willson; J E Cobb; D J Cowan; R W Wiethe; I D Correa; S R Prakash; K D Beck; L B Moore; S A Kliewer; J M Lehmann Journal: J Med Chem Date: 1996-02-02 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: E Mueller; M Smith; P Sarraf; T Kroll; A Aiyer; D S Kaufman; W Oh; G Demetri; W D Figg; X P Zhou; C Eng; B M Spiegelman; P W Kantoff Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2000-09-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Harold J Burstein; George D Demetri; Elisabetta Mueller; Pasha Sarraf; Bruce M Spiegelman; Eric P Winer Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Hsiaoju Lee; Delphine L Chen; Justin M Rothfuss; Michael J Welch; Robert J Gropler; Robert H Mach Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 2011-09-09 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Keun Sam Jang; Yong-Woon Jung; Guie Gu; Robert A Koeppe; Phillip S Sherman; Carole A Quesada; David M Raffel Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2013-09-05 Impact factor: 7.446