Literature DB >> 21052726

Reoperative antireflux surgery for dysphagia.

András Légner1, Kazuto Tsuboi, Lokesh Bathla, Tommy Lee, Lee E Morrow, Sumeet K Mittal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Troublesome dysphagia is a common indication for redo antireflux surgery (Re-ARS). This study is aimed to analyze the efficacy of Re-ARS in resolving dysphagia and to identify risk factors for persistent or new-onset dysphagia after Re-ARS.
METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients after Re-ARS. Dysphagia severity was graded on a scale of 0 to 3 before and after Re-ARS based on responses to a standardized questionnaire. Patients reporting grade 2 or 3 symptoms were considered to have significant dysphagia. Satisfaction was graded using a 10-point analog scale.
RESULTS: Between December 2003 and July 2008, 106 patients underwent Re-ARS. Significant preoperative dysphagia was reported by 54 patients, and impaired esophageal motility was noted in 31 patients. Remedial surgery included redo fundoplication (n = 87), Collis gastroplasty with redo fundoplication (n = 16), and takedown of the fundoplication or hiatal closure alone (n = 3). At least 1 year follow-up period (mean 21.8 months) was available for 92 patients. For patients with significant preoperative dysphagia (n = 46), the mean symptom score declined from 2.35 to 0.78 (p < 0.0001). Persistent dysphagia was reported by 13 patients and new-onset dysphagia by 4 patients. No patients reported grade 3 dysphagia after Re-ARS. Dilations were used to treat 11 patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified Collis gastroplasty (p = 0.03; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 5.74) and preoperative dysphagia (p = 0.01; adjusted OR, 6.80) as risk factors for significant postoperative dysphagia. The overall satisfaction score was 8.3, but certain subsets had significantly lower satisfaction scores. These subsets included patients with esophageal dysmotility (7.1; p = 0.04), patients who required Collis gastroplasty (7.0; p = 0.09), and patients with esophageal dysmotility who required Collis gastroplasty (5.0; p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Although dysphagia is a common symptom among patients requiring Re-ARS, intervention provides a significant benefit. Patients with preoperative dysphagia, especially those requiring Collis gastroplasty, are at increased risk for persistent dysphagia and decreased satisfaction after Re-ARS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21052726     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1333-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  40 in total

1.  Repair of 104 failed anti-reflux operations.

Authors:  Atif Iqbal; Ziad Awad; Jennifer Simkins; Ricky Shah; Mumnoon Haider; Vanessa Salinas; Kiran Turaga; Anouki Karu; Sumeet K Mittal; Charles J Filipi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  The influence of surgical technique on clinical outcome of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  J S Wu; D L Dunnegan; D R Luttmann; N J Soper
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Failed antireflux surgery: results after reoperation.

Authors:  Galen A Ohnmacht; Claude Deschamps; Stephen D Cassivi; Francis C Nichols; Mark S Allen; Cathy D Schleck; Peter C Pairolero
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Tailored antireflux surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease: effectiveness and risk of postoperative dysphagia.

Authors:  G J Wetscher; K Glaser; T Wieschemeyer; M Gadenstaetter; R Prommegger; C Profanter
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Nissen vs Toupet laparoscopic fundoplication.

Authors:  C Zornig; U Strate; C Fibbe; A Emmermann; P Layer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Dysphagia after laparoscopic antireflux surgery. The impact of operative technique.

Authors:  J G Hunter; L Swanstrom; J P Waring
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Reflux, dysphagia, and gas bloat after laparoscopic fundoplication in patients with incidentally discovered hiatal hernia and in a control group.

Authors:  Frederic Triponez; Jean-Marc Dumonceau; Dan Azagury; Francesco Volonte; Karem Slim; Bernadette Mermillod; Olivier Huber; Philippe Morel
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Laparoscopic revision of failed fundoplication and hiatal herniorraphy.

Authors:  Constantine T Frantzides; Atul K Madan; Mark A Carlson; Tallal M Zeni; John G Zografakis; Ronald M Moore; Mick Meiselman; Minh Luu; Georgios D Ayiomamitis
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.878

9.  Laparoscopic reintervention for failed antireflux surgery: subjective and objective outcomes in 176 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Yashodhan S Khajanchee; Robert O'Rourke; Maria A Cassera; Prakash Gatta; Paul D Hansen; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2007-08

Review 10.  Mesh complications after prosthetic reinforcement of hiatal closure: a 28-case series.

Authors:  Rudolf J Stadlhuber; Amr El Sherif; Sumeet K Mittal; Robert J Fitzgibbons; L Michael Brunt; John G Hunter; Tom R Demeester; Lee L Swanstrom; C Daniel Smith; Charles J Filipi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  11 in total

1.  A proposed classification for uniform endoscopic description of surgical fundoplication.

Authors:  Sumeet K Mittal; Arpad Juhasz; Bala Ramanan; Masato Hoshino; Tommy H Lee; Charles J Filipi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Guidelines for the management of hiatal hernia.

Authors:  Geoffrey Paul Kohn; Raymond Richard Price; Steven R DeMeester; Jörg Zehetner; Oliver J Muensterer; Ziad Awad; Sumeet K Mittal; William S Richardson; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Efficacy and feasibility of laparoscopic redo fundoplication.

Authors:  Lokesh Bathla; Andras Legner; Kazuto Tsuboi; Sumeet Mittal
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Roux-en-Y reconstruction is superior to redo fundoplication in a subset of patients with failed antireflux surgery.

Authors:  Sumeet K Mittal; András Légner; Kazuto Tsuboi; Arpad Juhasz; Lokesh Bathla; Tommy H Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Patient Expectations After Collis Gastroplasty.

Authors:  Daniel Shouhed; Deven C Patel; Kevin Shamash; Lydia Kirillova; Miguel Burch; Harmik J Soukiasian; Edward H Phillips
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  The role of short-limb Roux-en-Y reconstruction for failed antireflux surgery: a single-center 5-year experience.

Authors:  Konstantinos I Makris; Aru Panwar; Brittany L Willer; Anah Ali; Katherine L Sramek; Tommy H Lee; Sumeet K Mittal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Outcomes of surgical management of symptomatic large recurrent hiatus hernia.

Authors:  Arpad Juhasz; Abhishek Sundaram; Masato Hoshino; Tommy H Lee; Sumeet K Mittal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Percentage of intrathoracic stomach predicts operative and post-operative morbidity, persistent reflux and PPI requirement following laparoscopic hiatus hernia repair and fundoplication.

Authors:  A M Cocco; V Chai; M Read; S Ward; M A Johnson; L Chong; C Gillespie; M W Hii
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-10-24       Impact factor: 3.453

9.  Long-term outcomes of reintervention for failed fundoplication: redo fundoplication versus Roux-en-Y reconstruction.

Authors:  Se Ryung Yamamoto; Masato Hoshino; Kalyana C Nandipati; Tommy H Lee; Sumeet K Mittal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  [Report of 12 years experience in the surgical treatment of 286 paraesophageal hernias].

Authors:  B Geißler; E Birk; M Anthuber
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.