Literature DB >> 19215879

The low-template-DNA (stochastic) threshold--its determination relative to risk analysis for national DNA databases.

Peter Gill1, Roberto Puch-Solis, James Curran.   

Abstract

Although the low-template or stochastic threshold is in widespread use and is typically set to 150-200 rfu peak height, there has been no consideration on its determination and meaning. In this paper we propose a definition that is based upon the specific risk of wrongful designation of a heterozygous genotype as a homozygote which could lead to a false exclusion. Conversely, it is possible that a homozygote {a,a} could be designated as {a,F} where 'F' is a 'wild card', and this could lead to increased risk of false inclusion. To determine these risk levels, we analysed an experimental dataset that exhibited extreme drop-out using logistic regression. The derived probabilities are employed in a graphical model to determine the relative risks of wrongful designations that may cause false inclusions and exclusions. The methods described in this paper provide a preliminary solution of risk evaluation for any DNA process that employs a stochastic threshold.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19215879     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2008.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  9 in total

1.  Modeling one complete versus triplicate analyses in low template DNA typing.

Authors:  Jianye Ge; Bruce Budowle
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Rapid detection of blaKPC carbapenemase genes by internally controlled real-time PCR assay using bactec blood culture bottles.

Authors:  Musa Hindiyeh; Gill Smollan; Zehava Grossman; Daniela Ram; Jana Robinov; Natasha Belausov; Debbie Ben-David; Ilana Tal; Yehudit Davidson; Ari Shamiss; Ella Mendelson; Nathan Keller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  An information gap in DNA evidence interpretation.

Authors:  Mark W Perlin; Alexander Sinelnikov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Low-template DNA: A single DNA analysis or two replicates?

Authors:  Simone Gittelson; Carolyn R Steffen; Michael D Coble
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the evaluation of STR typing results that may include drop-out and/or drop-in using probabilistic methods.

Authors:  P Gill; L Gusmão; H Haned; W R Mayr; N Morling; W Parson; L Prieto; M Prinz; H Schneider; P M Schneider; B S Weir
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 4.882

6.  Forensic trace DNA: a review.

Authors:  Roland Ah van Oorschot; Kaye N Ballantyne; R John Mitchell
Journal:  Investig Genet       Date:  2010-12-01

7.  Public access to genome-wide data: five views on balancing research with privacy and protection.

Authors:  George Church; Catherine Heeney; Naomi Hawkins; Jantina de Vries; Paula Boddington; Jane Kaye; Martin Bobrow; Bruce Weir
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  TrueAllele casework on Virginia DNA mixture evidence: computer and manual interpretation in 72 reported criminal cases.

Authors:  Mark W Perlin; Kiersten Dormer; Jennifer Hornyak; Lisa Schiermeier-Wood; Susan Greenspoon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Interpreting Mixture Profiles: Comparison between Precision ID GlobalFiler™ NGS STR Panel v2 and Traditional Methods.

Authors:  Michele Ragazzo; Stefania Carboni; Valerio Caputo; Carlotta Buttini; Laura Manzo; Valeria Errichiello; Giulio Puleri; Emiliano Giardina
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.096

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.