Literature DB >> 19215639

Surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with laminectomy and instrumented fusion.

Beril Gok1, Gregory S McLoughlin, Daniel M Sciubba, Mathew J McGirt, Kaisorn L Chaichana, Jean-Paul Wolinsky, Ali Bydon, Ziya L Gokaslan, Timothy F Witham.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The indications for treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) with laminectomy and instrumented fusion remain ill-defined. Cervical laminectomy without instrumented fusion has been associated with suboptimal outcomes, particularly in the setting of cervical kyphosis. This work's purpose is to retrospectively review our experience in patients who underwent laminectomy with instrumented fusion for CSM and to assess the neurological and radiological outcomes of patients treated with this technique.
METHODS: Fifty-four consecutive patients underwent multilevel laminectomy and instrumented fusion for CSM. The indications were patients with (1) cervical stenosis > or = 3 spinal segments and (2) absence of a cervical kyphosis or (3) patients older than 65 years with significant medical comorbidities. Nurick myelopathy grades and cervical radiographs were obtained preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post-operatively. Perioperative complications, radiographic and clinical outcomes were assessed and reported in this paper.
RESULTS: Forty-four (81%) of patients showed improvement in Nurick grade after surgery by a mean of 17 months. Ten patients (19%) demonstrated stable but unimproved myelopathy. Increasing pre-operative Nurick grade was associated with an improved post-operative outcome (p<0.02). Increasing duration of pre-operative myelopathy was associated with a decreased likelihood of myelopathy improvement (p<0.001). DISCUSSION: Multilevel cervical laminectomy with instrumented fusion for patients with CSM resulted in an improvement in myelopathy in the majority of cases. Efficacy was similar for patients who may not have tolerated an anterior decompression, such as elderly patients with significant medical comorbidities. Hardware-related complication rates were relatively low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19215639     DOI: 10.1179/174313209X383277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Res        ISSN: 0161-6412            Impact factor:   2.448


  11 in total

1.  Surgical treatment of multilevel cervical spondylosis in patients with or without a history of syringomyelia.

Authors:  Jörg Klekamp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Predictors of outcome in patients with degenerative cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment: results of a systematic review.

Authors:  Lindsay A Tetreault; Alina Karpova; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Surgical site infections following operative management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: prevalence, predictors of occurence, and influence on peri-operative outcomes.

Authors:  C M Jalai; N Worley; G W Poorman; D L Cruz; S Vira; P G Passias
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Increased in-hospital complications after primary posterior versus primary anterior cervical fusion.

Authors:  Stavros G Memtsoudis; Alexander Hughes; Yan Ma; Ya Lin Chiu; Andrew A Sama; Federico P Girardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion for the treatment of spondylotic cervical myelopathy: short-term follow-up.

Authors:  Daniel J Blizzard; Adam M Caputo; Charles Z Sheets; Mitchell R Klement; Keith W Michael; Robert E Isaacs; Christopher R Brown
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Barrett I Woods; Justin Hohl; Joon Lee; William Donaldson; James Kang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Clinical outcome of anterior vs posterior approach for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Mario Alberto Cahueque Lemus; Andres Enrique Cobar Bustamante; Alfredo Ortiz Muciño; Gustavo Caldera Hernandez
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-03-26

8.  The role of iatrogenic foraminal stenosis from lordotic correction in the development of C5 palsy after posterior laminectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Daniel J Blizzard; Michael A Gallizzi; Charles Sheets; Mitchell R Klement; Lindsay T Kleeman; Adam M Caputo; Megan Eure; Christopher R Brown
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion in the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: systematic review and a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhi-Qiang Wen; Jing-Yu Du; Zhi-Heng Ling; Hai-Dong Xu; Xiang-Jin Lin
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Laminoplasty and laminectomy hybrid decompression for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with hypertrophic ligamentum flavum: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Huairong Ding; Yuan Xue; Yanming Tang; Dong He; Zhiyang Li; Ying Zhao; Yaqi Zong; Yi Wang; Pei Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.