Literature DB >> 27076742

Clinical outcome of anterior vs posterior approach for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Mario Alberto Cahueque Lemus1, Andres Enrique Cobar Bustamante1, Alfredo Ortiz Muciño1, Gustavo Caldera Hernandez1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim is to demonstrate whether there is clinical difference between posterior vs anterior decompression in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
METHODS: Forty-two patient database was obtained from the Centro Medico Nacional de Occidente in Mexico, those who underwent surgical treatment for cervical myelopathy with a mean 1.4 year follow-up.
RESULTS: Patients were divided; group A (45%) anterior approach and group B (55%) posterior approach, for mJOA, group A had a lower score compare with group B. While in the Nurick score group B got a higher score compare with group A.
CONCLUSIONS: Posterior decompression resulted in better functional outcomes (p < 0.05).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior approach; Cervical myelopathy; Clinical outcome; Decompression; Posterior approach

Year:  2016        PMID: 27076742      PMCID: PMC4816908          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2016.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  21 in total

1.  Surgically treated cervical myelopathy: a functional outcome comparison study between multilevel anterior cervical decompression fusion with instrumentation and posterior laminoplasty.

Authors:  Chusheng Seng; Benjamin P B Tow; Mashfiqul A Siddiqui; Abhishek Srivastava; Lushun Wang; Andy K S Yew; William Yeo; Shu Hui Rebecca Khoo; Nidu Maran Shanmugam Balakrishnan; Hamid Rahmatullah Bin Abd Razak; John L T Chen; Chang M Guo; Seang B Tan; Wai-Mun Yue
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 2.  Anterior approach for complex cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Krzysztof B Siemionow; Sergey Neckrysh
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.472

3.  Anterior surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: review article.

Authors:  John C Quinn; Paul D Kiely; Darren R Lebl; Alexander P Hughes
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2014-08-08

4.  Corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched-cohort analysis.

Authors:  Charles C Edwards; John G Heller; Hideki Murakami
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Comparison between anterior and posterior decompression with instrumentation for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: sagittal alignment and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Mario Cabraja; Alexander Abbushi; Daniel Koeppen; Stefan Kroppenstedt; Christian Woiciechowsky
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 6.  Anterior corpectomy versus posterior laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xuzhou Liu; Shaoxiong Min; Hui Zhang; Zhilai Zhou; Hehui Wang; Anmin Jin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with laminectomy and instrumented fusion.

Authors:  Beril Gok; Gregory S McLoughlin; Daniel M Sciubba; Mathew J McGirt; Kaisorn L Chaichana; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ali Bydon; Ziya L Gokaslan; Timothy F Witham
Journal:  Neurol Res       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 2.448

8.  A retrospective analysis of patient perceived outcomes in patients 55 years and older undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Matthew J Gray; Ashok Biyani; Asher Smith
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2010-05

9.  Anterior versus posterior surgical approaches to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy: outcomes of the prospective multicenter AOSpine North America CSM study in 264 patients.

Authors:  Michael G Fehlings; Sean Barry; Branko Kopjar; Sangwook Tim Yoon; Paul Arnold; Eric M Massicotte; Alexander Vaccaro; Darrel S Brodke; Christopher Shaffrey; Justin S Smith; Eric Woodard; Robert J Banco; Jens Chapman; Michael Janssen; Christopher Bono; Rick Sasso; Mark Dekutoski; Ziya L Gokaslan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Comparison of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and modified JOA (mJOA) score for the assessment of cervical myelopathy: a multicenter observational study.

Authors:  So Kato; Yasushi Oshima; Hiroyuki Oka; Hirotaka Chikuda; Yujiro Takeshita; Kota Miyoshi; Naohiro Kawamura; Kazuhiro Masuda; Junichi Kunogi; Rentaro Okazaki; Seiichi Azuma; Nobuhiro Hara; Sakae Tanaka; Katsushi Takeshita
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.