Literature DB >> 19214294

Results following implantation of mechanical circulatory support systems: the Montreal Heart Institute experience.

Ismaïl El-Hamamsy1, Frédéric Jacques, Louis P Perrault, Denis Bouchard, Pphilippe Demers, Michel White, Guy B Pelletier, Normand Racine, Michel Pellerin, Michel Carrier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mechanical circulatory support systems (MCSS) have been available in Canada since 1986. Accepted indications include bridging to transplantation or recovery. The present study reviewed the results following MCSS implantation at the Montreal Heart Institute (Montreal, Quebec).
METHODS: From September 1987 to September 2006, 43 MCSS were implanted (32 Thoratec [Thoratec Corporation, USA], nine CardioWest TAH [SynCardia Systems Inc, USA], two Novacor [WorldHeart Corporation, Canada]) in 43 patients (mean [+/- SD] age 44+/-13 years; range 19 to 64 years). Indications for implantation included cardiogenic shock due to ischemic (n=19), viral (n=10) or other types of cardiomyopathies (n=14).
RESULTS: The mean ejection fraction before implantation was 17.6+/-6.5% (range 10% to 45%). Before MCSS implantation, most patients showed signs of end-organ failure, including mechanical ventilation (77%), central venous pressure higher than 16 mmHg (44%), oliguria (35%) and hepatic dysfunction (19%). The mean duration of MCSS support was 22.8+/-32.8 days (range one to 158 days). Survival to transplantation or recovery was 74%. Only one patient was successfully bridged to recovery. Complications were common during MCSS support. They included reexploration for bleeding (47%), respiratory failure (44%), renal failure requiring temporary dialysis (40%), infection (33%) and neurological events (16%). Only one patient had device failure. In patients successfully bridged to transplantation, early actuarial survival (one month) following transplantation averaged 71+/-8% and was 57+/-9% at one year.
CONCLUSION: MCSS support with a left ventricular assist device or a total artificial heart provides an effective means of bridging terminally ill patients to transplantation or recovery. Early survival after transplantation shows satisfactory results. However, these results come at the expense of frequent device-related complications, and device failure remains a constant threat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19214294      PMCID: PMC2691912          DOI: 10.1016/s0828-282x(09)70478-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Cardiol        ISSN: 0828-282X            Impact factor:   5.223


  11 in total

Review 1.  2001 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Consensus Conference on cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  Heather Ross; Paul Hendry; Anne Dipchand; Nadia Giannetti; Greg Hirsch; Debra Isaac; Narendra Singh; Lori West; Michel White; Andrew Ignaszewski; Anton Maria Chung; Lynn Straatman; Dennis Modry; Wayne Tymchak; Jeffrey Burton; Wayne Warnica; Jose Eduardo Azevedo; William Kostuk; Alan Menkis; Peter Pflugfelder; Mackenzie Quantz; Ross Davies; Haissam Haddad; Roy Masters; Robert Cusimano; Diego Delgado; Chris Feindel; Vivek Rao; Marcelo Cantarovich; Renzo Cecere; Michel Carrier; Michel Pellerin; Daniel Doyle; Marie-Hélène LeBlanc; Jonathan Howlett; Henry Haddad
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.223

2.  Under-utilization of mechanical circulatory support in Canada: why and what can be done?

Authors:  Tofy Mussivand; Michel Carrier; Ray C J Chiu; Ross A Davies; Diego H Delgado; Mario C Deng; Haissam Haddad; Paul J Hendry; Wilbert J Keon; Arvind Koshal; Roy G Masters; Thierry Mesana; Vivek Rao
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.094

3.  Left ventricular assist device: can Canada afford this?

Authors:  M Carrier
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.223

4.  Successful explantation of a left ventricular assist device following acute fulminant myocarditis.

Authors:  Ismaïl El-Hamamsy; Michel White; Michel Pellerin; Philippe Demers; Denis Bouchard; Tack Ki Leung; Louis P Perrault; Michel Carrier
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 5.223

5.  Circulatory support for cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction: a Canadian experience.

Authors:  P J Hendry; R G Masters; T V Mussivand; S Smith; R A Davies; S Finlay; W J Keon
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.223

6.  100 long-term implantable left ventricular assist devices: the Columbia Presbyterian interim experience.

Authors:  B C Sun; K A Catanese; T B Spanier; M R Flannery; M T Gardocki; L S Marcus; H R Levin; E A Rose; M C Oz
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Effect of left ventricular assist device bridging to transplantation on donor waiting time and outcomes in Canada.

Authors:  Michel Carrier; Louis P Perrault; Denis Bouchard; Michel Pellerin; Normand Racine; Michel White; Guy Pelletier
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.223

8.  Ventricular assist devices as a 'bridge to recovery': where do we stand?

Authors:  Moheb Ibrahim; Paul Hendry
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 9.  Developments in mechanical support as a bridge to cardiac transplant.

Authors:  Paul Hendry
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 5.223

10.  Screening scale predicts patients successfully receiving long-term implantable left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  M C Oz; D J Goldstein; P Pepino; A D Weinberg; S M Thompson; K A Catanese; R L Vargo; P M McCarthy; E A Rose; H R Levin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-11-01       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cardiac assist device infections.

Authors:  Shmuel Shoham; Leslie W Miller
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 2.  A ventricular assist device as a bridge to recovery, decision making, or transplantation in patients with advanced cardiac failure.

Authors:  Siyamek Neragi-Miandoab
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.549

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.