Literature DB >> 7586403

Screening scale predicts patients successfully receiving long-term implantable left ventricular assist devices.

M C Oz1, D J Goldstein, P Pepino, A D Weinberg, S M Thompson, K A Catanese, R L Vargo, P M McCarthy, E A Rose, H R Levin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although use of long-term implantable left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) is becoming more popular, further reduction of the mortality rate accompanying device insertion through improved patient selection would make this alternative even more appealing. We sought to develop a scoring system that was based on criteria obtainable at the time of evaluation and predictive of successful early outcome and simple to apply. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients (n = 56) undergoing LVAD insertion between 1990 and 1994 were screened for easily obtainable preoperative risk factors. To test the association between survival and each risk factor, a chi 2 analysis was performed, and relative risks were estimated. Oliguria, ventilator dependence, elevated central venous pressure, elevated prothrombin time, and reoperation stats had low probability values and high estimated relative risks. On the basis of these relations, a risk factor-selection scale (RFSS) (range, 0 to 10) was developed by computing appropriate weights for each risk factor. The distribution of patients for each scale score reveal that with RFSS > or = 5, most device recipients will die (P < .001). The average RFSS (+/- SD) of survivors (n = 42) was 2.45 +/- 1.73 compared with 5.43 +/- 2.85 in nonsurvivors (n = 14) (P < .0001). Univariate logistical regression was also significant (score statistic, 16.2; df = 1; P = .001).
CONCLUSIONS: The RFSS is simple, easy to apply, and statistically valid. Physicians could use the scale as a starting point in discussing the suitability for LVAD implantation in a specific patient and as a basis for comparing patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7586403     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.92.9.169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  13 in total

1.  Importance of luxury flow for critically ill patients receiving a left ventricular assist system.

Authors:  Motonobu Nishimura; Takashi Nishimura; Masayuki Ishikawa; Ayumu Masuoka; Nobuyuki Okamura; Keiko Abe; Takahiro Matsuoka; Mika Iwazaki; Kazuhito Imanaka; Haruhiko Asano; Shunei Kyo
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 1.731

2.  Evolution of association between renal and liver functions while awaiting heart transplant: An application using a bivariate multiphase nonlinear mixed effects model.

Authors:  Jeevanantham Rajeswaran; Eugene H Blackstone; John Barnard
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 3.  [Improvements in implantable mechanical circulatory support systems : literature overview and update].

Authors:  T Krabatsch; M Schweiger; A Stepanenko; T Drews; E Potapov; M Pasic; Y Weng; M Huebler; R Hetzer
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  Outcomes in patients with advanced heart failure and small body size undergoing continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Nastasya Volkovicher; Chitaru Kurihara; Andre Critsinelis; Masashi Kawabori; Tadahisa Sugiura; Marcos Manon; Andrew B Civitello; Jeffrey A Morgan
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 5.  Ventricular assist devices: history, patient selection, and timing of therapy.

Authors:  Daniel G Tang; Philip E Oyer; Hari R Mallidi
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Risk score derived from pre-operative data analysis predicts the need for biventricular mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  J Raymond Fitzpatrick; John R Frederick; Vivian M Hsu; Elliott D Kozin; Mary Lou O'Hara; Elan Howell; Deborah Dougherty; Ryan C McCormick; Carine A Laporte; Jeffrey E Cohen; Kevin W Southerland; Jessica L Howard; Mariell L Jessup; Rohinton J Morris; Michael A Acker; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 10.247

7.  Results following implantation of mechanical circulatory support systems: the Montreal Heart Institute experience.

Authors:  Ismaïl El-Hamamsy; Frédéric Jacques; Louis P Perrault; Denis Bouchard; Pphilippe Demers; Michel White; Guy B Pelletier; Normand Racine; Michel Pellerin; Michel Carrier
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.223

8.  The TandemHeart as a bridge to a long-term axial-flow left ventricular assist device (bridge to bridge).

Authors:  Igor D Gregoric; Leon P Jacob; Saverio La Francesca; Brian A Bruckner; William E Cohn; Pranav Loyalka; Biswajit Kar; O H Frazier
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2008

Review 9.  Ventricular assist devices: is destination therapy a viable alternative in the non-transplant candidate?

Authors:  Tara Hrobowski; David E Lanfear
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2013-03

10.  Percutaneous ventricular assist device placement during active cardiopulmonary resuscitation for severe refractory cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Gary M Idelchik; Pranav Loyalka; Biswajit Kar
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.