Literature DB >> 10523475

Circulatory support for cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction: a Canadian experience.

P J Hendry1, R G Masters, T V Mussivand, S Smith, R A Davies, S Finlay, W J Keon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is associated with high mortality. Circulatory support devices may be used to assist these patients while they await cardiac transplantation. METHODS AND
RESULTS: From 1986 to 1997, 25 patients in cardiogenic shock complicating AMI within 3.6+/-0.7 days of the event were supported with artificial hearts. Of the 25 patients, 21 were men with a mean age of 48.4 +/- 1.8 years. The age range was 26 to 62 years. Patients were considered for a device when the following criteria were met: cardiac index less than 1.8 L/min/m2, wedge pressure greater than 20 mmHg despite one or two inotropes and/or intra-aortic balloon support. They received either a CardioWest total artificial heart (n=13), a Thoratec biventricular assist device (n=6) or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) (n=6). Three patients were not considered transplant candidates and died while on the devices (two with multiorgan failure and one found to have a bronchogenic carcinoma after implant), with 22 undergoing cardiac transplantation within 8.6+/-2.2 days of device implant. Six patients died in hospital after the transplants (27.3% mortality). Complications included bleeding or tamponade in seven (28%), pneumonia in six (24%) and right ventricular failure in three LVAD patients (12%). Post-transplant actuarial one-, two- and five-year survival rates were 71.4%, 71.4% and 51%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Circulatory support devices offer a means to maintain organ perfusion in patients who develop cardiogenic shock due to AMI. Patients can then undergo transplantation with a reasonable expectation for survival when the alternative is death. Eventually the availability of permanent support devices may obviate the need for transplant in these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10523475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Cardiol        ISSN: 0828-282X            Impact factor:   5.223


  5 in total

1.  Results following implantation of mechanical circulatory support systems: the Montreal Heart Institute experience.

Authors:  Ismaïl El-Hamamsy; Frédéric Jacques; Louis P Perrault; Denis Bouchard; Pphilippe Demers; Michel White; Guy B Pelletier; Normand Racine; Michel Pellerin; Michel Carrier
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.223

2.  Left ventricular assist devices: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2004-03-01

3.  Adequate systemic perfusion maintained by a CentriMag during acute heart failure.

Authors:  Roberto R Favaloro; Alejandro Bertolotti; Mirta Diez; Liliana Favaloro; Carmen Gomez; Margarita Peradejordi; Julio Trentadue; Lorena Hellman; Yanina Arzani; Pilar Varela Otero
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2008

4.  Mechanical circulatory support for refractory cardiogenic shock post-acute myocardial infarction-a decade of lessons.

Authors:  Sanjeet Singh Avtaar Singh; Sudeep Das De; Francesco Nappi; Ahmed Al-Adhami; Yasser Hegazy; Jonathan Dalzell; Harikrishna Doshi; Andrew Sinclair; Philip Curry; Mark Petrie; Colin Berry; Nawwar Al-Attar
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Mechanical assist devices for acute cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Tamara Ni hIci; Henry Mp Boardman; Kamran Baig; Jody L Stafford; Cristina Cernei; Owen Bodger; Stephen Westaby
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-06-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.