Literature DB >> 19214160

Cigarette brand preference among middle and high school students who are established smokers - United States, 2004 and 2006.

.   

Abstract

Studies have suggested a link between exposure to tobacco advertising and cigarette brand preference. Knowing the brand preferences of young established smokers can provide insight into what influences young smokers to start and continue to smoke. A report of 2005 data indicated that the three most heavily advertised brands, Marlboro, Newport, and Camel, were preferred by 81% of U.S. youths aged 12-17 years. To assess the cigarette brand preferences among middle school and high school students who were established smokers, CDC analyzed data from the 2004 and 2006 National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS). This report summarizes the results of that analysis, which indicated that among established student smokers in middle and high school, Marlboro was the preferred brand (43.3% and 52.3%, respectively), followed by Newport (26.4% and 21.4%, respectively). The use of Newport was significantly higher among blacks in middle school (59.7%) and high school (78.6%) compared with other racial/ethnic groups. Information on brand preferences and tobacco marketing strategies that are attractive to students can be used by tobacco control programs and community initiatives in the design of tobacco countermarketing campaigns. These countermarketing campaigns have been shown to be effective as part of a comprehensive tobacco control program to decrease the initiation of tobacco use among youths and young adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19214160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep        ISSN: 0149-2195            Impact factor:   17.586


  11 in total

1.  The Cigarette and Smokeless Tobacco Markets in Texas Relative to the United States.

Authors:  Erin J Miller Lo; Daniel P Giovenco; Olivia A Wackowski; Melissa B Harrell; Cheryl L Perry; Cristine D Delnevo
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2017-04-01

2.  US Smokers' Beliefs, Experiences and Perceptions of Different Cigarette Variants Before and After the FSPTCA Ban on Misleading Descriptors Such as "Light," "Mild," or "Low".

Authors:  Hua-Hie Yong; Ron Borland; K Michael Cummings; Eric N Lindblom; Lin Li; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Richard J O'Connor; Tara Elton-Marshall; James F Thrasher; David Hammond; Mary E Thompson; Timea R Partos
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Contextual and community factors associated with youth access to cigarettes through commercial sources.

Authors:  Sharon Lipperman-Kreda; Joel W Grube; Karen B Friend
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Pro-tobacco influences and susceptibility to smoking cigarettes among middle and high school students--United States, 2011.

Authors:  Shanta R Dube; René A Arrazola; Joann Lee; Martha Engstrom; Ann Malarcher
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.012

5.  From promotion to cessation: masculinity, race, and style in the consumption of cigarettes, 1962-1972.

Authors:  Cameron White; John L Oliffe; Joan L Bottorff
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Direct-to-consumer tobacco marketing and its association with tobacco use among adolescents and young adults.

Authors:  Samir Soneji; Bridget K Ambrose; Won Lee; James Sargent; Susanne Tanski
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 5.012

7.  Magazine hyped: Trends in tobacco advertising and readership characteristics, 2010-2014.

Authors:  Sherine M El-Toukhy; Kelvin Choi
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Menthol cigarette pricing at military and community retail outlets in the United States.

Authors:  Walker S C Poston; Sara A Jahnke; Christopher K Haddock; Melissa L Hyder; Jennifer E Taylor; Harry A Lando; Christopher M Kaipust
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Disparities and menthol marketing: additional evidence in support of point of sale policies.

Authors:  Sarah Moreland-Russell; Jenine Harris; Doneisha Snider; Heidi Walsh; Julianne Cyr; Joaquin Barnoya
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 10.  Menthol cigarettes and the public health standard: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrea C Villanti; Lauren K Collins; Raymond S Niaura; Stacey Y Gagosian; David B Abrams
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.