Literature DB >> 19212451

What Factors are Associated with Where Women Undergo Clinical Breast Examination? Results from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey.

Steven S Coughlin1, Susan A Sabatino, Kate M Shaw.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have suggested that clinical breast examination (CBE) rates may vary according to patient, provider and health care system characteristics.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the locations where U.S. women received a CBE and other general preventive health, and to examine predictors of location of receipt of general preventive health care (including a recent CBE).
DESIGN: Age-specific and age-adjusted rates of CBE use were calculated using Statistical Analysis Software (SAS) and SUDAAN. A multivariate analysis was carried out using logistic regression techniques. PARTICIPANTS: Women aged 40 years and older (n = 10,002) who participated in the 2005 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). MEASUREMENTS: Recent CBE use was defined as within the past two years.
RESULTS: Among all women, 65% reported a CBE within two years. The highest rate was found among women receiving routine care from doctors' offices and health maintenance organizations (HMOs) (68.5%). CBE use was somewhat lower among women receiving routine care from clinics or health centers (62.9%), and substantially lower among women receiving care from "other" locations (28.4%) or not reporting receiving preventive care (25.3%). Low income women (p < .01) and those with less than a high school education (p < .01) are more likely to go to a hospital than higher SES women. Women with health insurance are much more likely than women without health insurance to go to a doctor's office or HMO, and less likely to be seen at a clinic or health center (p < .01 in both instances). In multivariate analysis, women who received routine care in a location other than a clinic or health center, doctor's office or HMO, or hospital outpatient department (OPD) were less likely to have received a CBE within the past two years (adjusted OR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.3, 0.7) compared to those at a doctor's office or HMO.
CONCLUSIONS: After adjusting for patient factors, clinics/health centers and hospital OPDs performed as well as doctors' offices/HMOs in delivering CBE. However, women receiving care in other locations were less likely to report CBE.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; clinical breast examination; physicians; primary health care

Year:  2008        PMID: 19212451      PMCID: PMC2638069          DOI: 10.2174/1874189400802010032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Open Clin Cancer J        ISSN: 1874-1894


  15 in total

1.  Whatever happened to clinical breast examinations?

Authors:  Helen I Meissner; Nancy Breen; K Robin Yabroff
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 2.  Predictors of screening for breast, cervical, colorectal, and prostatic cancer among community-based primary care practices.

Authors:  M T Ruffin; D W Gorenflo; B Woodman
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb

3.  Validation of recall of breast and cervical cancer screening by women in an ethnically diverse population.

Authors:  Stephen J McPhee; Tung T Nguyen; Sarah J Shema; Bang Nguyen; Carol Somkin; Phuong Vo; Rena Pasick
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Screening mammography referral rates for women ages 50 to 69 years by recently-licensed family physicians: physician and practice environment correlates.

Authors:  J Haggerty; R Tamblyn; M Abrahamowicz; M D Beaulieu; N Kishchuk
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Cancer screening among community health center women: eliminating the gaps.

Authors:  J Regan; B Lefkowitz; M H Gaston
Journal:  J Ambul Care Manage       Date:  1999-10

6.  The association of health literacy with cervical cancer prevention knowledge and health behaviors in a multiethnic cohort of women.

Authors:  Stacy T Lindau; Cecilia Tomori; Tom Lyons; Lizbet Langseth; Charles L Bennett; Patricia Garcia
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Findings from 752,081 clinical breast examinations reported to a national screening program from 1995 through 1998.

Authors:  J K Bobo; N C Lee; S F Thames
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-06-21       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have breast cancer? The screening clinical breast examination: should it be done? How?

Authors:  M B Barton; R Harris; S W Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-06       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Interval adherence to mammography screening guidelines.

Authors:  J G Zapka; A Stoddard; L Maul; M E Costanza
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 10.  Worksite breast cancer screening programs: a review.

Authors:  L S Caplan; S S Coughlin
Journal:  AAOHN J       Date:  1998-09
View more
  2 in total

1.  Pointing the way to informed medical decision making: test characteristics of clinical breast examination.

Authors:  Mary B Barton; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Structural/organizational characteristics of health services partly explain racial variation in timeliness of radiation therapy among elderly breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Stephanie B Wheeler; William R Carpenter; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Anna P Schenck; Morris Weinberger; Andrea K Biddle
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-01-22       Impact factor: 4.872

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.