Literature DB >> 14507535

Whatever happened to clinical breast examinations?

Helen I Meissner1, Nancy Breen, K Robin Yabroff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine trends in the use of clinical breast examinations (CBE), mammography, and both tests between the years 1990 and 2000.
METHODS: Receipt of breast cancer screening tests (CBE, mammography, and both tests combined) for white, black, and Hispanic women in 1990, 1994, 1998, and 2000 were examined by sociodemographic, access, and health risk indicators using data from the National Health Interview Survey.
RESULTS: The use of mammography increased from 1990 to 2000, but the proportion of women reporting a recent CBE decreased for almost all groups of women. Differential use of CBE by sociodemographic characteristics is consistent with what has been documented for mammography.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the use of mammography has increased since 1990, there has been a downward trend in the use of CBE. Healthcare providers should be aware of the lower rates of CBE, particularly among women with compromised access to health care, and should not assume that women who get mammograms have received comprehensive screening for breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14507535     DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(03)00189-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  3 in total

1.  Pointing the way to informed medical decision making: test characteristics of clinical breast examination.

Authors:  Mary B Barton; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  What Factors are Associated with Where Women Undergo Clinical Breast Examination? Results from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Steven S Coughlin; Susan A Sabatino; Kate M Shaw
Journal:  Open Clin Cancer J       Date:  2008

3.  Specificity of clinical breast examination in community practice.

Authors:  Joshua J Fenton; Sharon J Rolnick; Emily L Harris; Mary B Barton; William E Barlow; Lisa M Reisch; Lisa J Herrinton; Ann M Geiger; Suzanne W Fletcher; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.128

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.