Literature DB >> 19206895

Underwater detection of tonal signals between 0.125 and 100 kHz by harbor seals (Phoca vitulina).

Ronald A Kastelein1, Paul J Wensveen, Lean Hoek, Willem C Verboom, John M Terhune.   

Abstract

The underwater hearing sensitivities of two 1-year-old female harbor seals were quantified in a pool built for acoustic research, using a behavioral psychoacoustic technique. The animals were trained to respond when they detected an acoustic signal and not to respond when they did not (go/no-go response). Pure tones (0.125-0.25 kHz) and narrowband frequency modulated (tonal) signals (center frequencies 0.5-100 kHz) of 900 ms duration were tested. Thresholds at each frequency were measured using the up-down staircase method and defined as the stimulus level resulting in a 50% detection rate. The audiograms of the two seals did not differ statistically: both plots showed the typical mammalian U-shape, but with a wide and flat bottom. Maximum sensitivity (54 dB re 1 microPa, rms) occurred at 1 kHz. The frequency range of best hearing (within 10 dB of maximum sensitivity) was from 0.5 to 40 kHz (6(1/3) octaves). Higher hearing thresholds (indicating poorer sensitivity) were observed below 1 and above 40 kHz. Thresholds below 4 kHz were lower than those previously described for harbor seals, which demonstrates the importance of using quiet facilities, built specifically for acoustic research, for hearing studies in marine mammals. The results suggest that under unmasked conditions many anthropogenic noise sources and sounds from conspecifics are audible to harbor seals at greater ranges than formerly believed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19206895     DOI: 10.1121/1.3050283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  Comparative assessment of amphibious hearing in pinnipeds.

Authors:  Colleen Reichmuth; Marla M Holt; Jason Mulsow; Jillian M Sills; Brandon L Southall
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Repeated elicitation of the acoustic startle reflex leads to sensitisation in subsequent avoidance behaviour and induces fear conditioning.

Authors:  Thomas Götz; Vincent M Janik
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.288

3.  Aerial low-frequency hearing in captive and free-ranging harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) measured using auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  Klaus Lucke; Gordon D Hastie; Kerstin Ternes; Bernie McConnell; Simon Moss; Deborah J F Russell; Heike Weber; Vincent M Janik
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Simulated seal scarer sounds scare porpoises, but not seals: species-specific responses to 12 kHz deterrence sounds.

Authors:  Lonnie Mikkelsen; Line Hermannsen; Kristian Beedholm; Peter Teglberg Madsen; Jakob Tougaard
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.963

5.  Ontogeny of vocal rhythms in harbor seal pups: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Andrea Ravignani; Christopher T Kello; Koen de Reus; Sonja A Kotz; Simone Dalla Bella; Margarita Méndez-Aróstegui; Beatriz Rapado-Tamarit; Ana Rubio-Garcia; Bart de Boer
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-07-07       Impact factor: 2.624

6.  Identifying modeled ship noise hotspots for marine mammals of Canada's Pacific region.

Authors:  Christine Erbe; Rob Williams; Doug Sandilands; Erin Ashe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Probability of detecting marine predator-prey and species interactions using novel hybrid acoustic transmitter-receiver tags.

Authors:  Laurie L Baker; Ian D Jonsen; Joanna E Mills Flemming; Damian C Lidgard; William D Bowen; Sara J Iverson; Dale M Webber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.