Literature DB >> 15447982

Molecular cytogenetic identification of subgroups of grade III invasive ductal breast carcinomas with different clinical outcomes.

Chris Jones1, Emily Ford, Cheryl Gillett, Ken Ryder, Samantha Merrett, Jorge S Reis-Filho, Laura G Fulford, Andrew Hanby, Sunil R Lakhani.   

Abstract

Tumor grade is an established indicator of breast cancer outcome, although considerable heterogeneity exists even within-grade. Around 25% of grade III invasive ductal breast carcinomas are associated with a "basal" phenotype, and these tumors are reported to be a distinct subgroup. We have investigated whether this group of breast cancers has a distinguishing pattern of genetic alterations and which of these may relate to the different clinical outcome of these patients. We performed comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis on 43 grade III invasive ductal breast carcinomas positive for basal cytokeratin 14, as well as 43 grade- and age-matched CK14-negative controls, all with up to 25 years (median, 7 years) of clinical follow-up. Significant differences in CGH alterations were seen between the two groups in terms of mean number of changes (CK14+ve - 6.5, CK14-ve - 10.3; P = 0.0012) and types of alterations at chromosomes 4q, 7q, 8q, 9p, 13q, 16p, 17p, 17q, 19p, 19q, 20p, 20q and Xp. Supervised and unsupervised algorithms separated the two groups on CGH data alone with 76% and 74% accuracy, respectively. Hierarchical clustering revealed distinct subgroups, one of which contained 18 (42%) of the CK14+ve tumors. This subgroup had significantly shorter overall survival (P=0.0414) than other grade III tumors, regardless of CK14 status, and was an independent prognostic marker (P=0.031). These data provide evidence that the "basal" phenotype on its own does not convey a poor prognosis. Basal tumors are also heterogeneous with only a subset, identifiable by pattern of genetic alterations, exhibiting a shorter overall survival. Robust characterization of this basal group is necessary if it is to have a major impact on management of patients with breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15447982     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  33 in total

Review 1.  Triple-negative breast cancer: disease entity or title of convenience?

Authors:  Lisa Carey; Eric Winer; Giuseppe Viale; David Cameron; Luca Gianni
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  The changing role of pathology in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Anthony S-Y Leong; Zhengping Zhuang
Journal:  Pathobiology       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  [The significance of "normal tissue" in the development of breast cancer: new concepts of early carcinogenesis].

Authors:  H Bürger; C Kersting; D Hungermann; T Decker; W Böcker
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.011

4.  Chromosomal changes in aggressive breast cancers with basal-like features.

Authors:  Wayne Yu; Yasmine Kanaan; Young Kyung Bae; Young-Kyung Baed; Edward Gabrielson
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  2009-08

5.  Genetic alterations in primary gastric carcinomas correlated with clinicopathological variables by array comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Ji Un Kang; Jason Jongho Kang; Kye Chul Kwon; Jong Woo Park; Tae Eun Jeong; Seung Mu Noh; Sun Hoe Koo
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Classification of arrayCGH data using fused SVM.

Authors:  Franck Rapaport; Emmanuel Barillot; Jean-Philippe Vert
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Favorable response to doxorubicin combination chemotherapy does not yield good clinical outcome in patients with metastatic breast cancer with triple-negative phenotype.

Authors:  Seong Yoon Yi; Jin Seok Ahn; Ji Eun Uhm; Do Hyoung Lim; Sang Hoon Ji; Hyun Jung Jun; Kyoung Ha Kim; Myung Hee Chang; Min Jae Park; Eun Yoon Cho; Yoon La Choi; Yeon Hee Park; Young-Hyuck Im
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Claudins 1, 3, and 4 protein expression in ER negative breast cancer correlates with markers of the basal phenotype.

Authors:  Anne A Blanchard; George P Skliris; Peter H Watson; Leigh C Murphy; Carla Penner; Ladislav Tomes; Tamara L Young; Etienne Leygue; Yvonne Myal
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  The key hypoxia regulated gene CAIX is upregulated in basal-like breast tumours and is associated with resistance to chemotherapy.

Authors:  E Y Tan; M Yan; L Campo; C Han; E Takano; H Turley; I Candiloro; F Pezzella; K C Gatter; E K A Millar; S A O'Toole; C M McNeil; P Crea; D Segara; R L Sutherland; A L Harris; S B Fox
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Meta-analysis and gene set enrichment relative to er status reveal elevated activity of MYC and E2F in the "basal" breast cancer subgroup.

Authors:  M Chehani Alles; Margaret Gardiner-Garden; David J Nott; Yixin Wang; John A Foekens; Robert L Sutherland; Elizabeth A Musgrove; Christopher J Ormandy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.