Literature DB >> 19201953

Detection of Campylobacter bacteria in air samples for continuous real-time monitoring of Campylobacter colonization in broiler flocks.

Katja N Olsen1, Marianne Lund, Julia Skov, Laurids S Christensen, Jeffrey Hoorfar.   

Abstract

Improved monitoring tools are important for the control of Campylobacter bacteria in broiler production. In this study, we compare the sensitivities of detection of Campylobacter by PCR with feces, dust, and air samples during the lifetimes of broilers in two poultry houses and conclude that the sensitivity of detection of Campylobacter in air is comparable to that in other sample materials. Profiling of airborne particles in six poultry houses revealed that the aerodynamic conditions were dependent on the age of the chickens and very comparable among different poultry houses, with low proportions of particles in the 0.5- to 2-microm-diameter range and high proportions in the 2- to 5-microm-diameter range. Campylobacter could also be detected by PCR in air samples collected at the hanging stage during the slaughter process but not at the other stages tested at the slaughterhouse. The exploitation of airborne dust in poultry houses as a sample material for the detection of Campylobacter and other pathogens provides an intriguing possibility, in conjunction with new detection technologies, for allowing continuous or semicontinuous monitoring of colonization status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19201953      PMCID: PMC2663182          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02182-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  12 in total

1.  Evaluation of sampling methods for the detection of Salmonella in broiler flocks.

Authors:  M N Skov; B Carstensen; N Tornøe; M Madsen
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.772

2.  Detection of Campylobacter spp. in chicken fecal samples by real-time PCR.

Authors:  Marianne Lund; Steen Nordentoft; Karl Pedersen; Mogens Madsen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Campylobacter incidence on a chicken farm and the spread of Campylobacter during the slaughter process.

Authors:  E Berndtson; M L Danielsson-Tham; A Engvall
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.277

4.  Distribution and prevalence of airborne microorganisms in three commercial poultry processing plants.

Authors:  P Whyte; J D Collins; K McGill; C Monahan; H O'Mahony
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.077

Review 5.  Campylobacter.

Authors:  John E Moore; Deborah Corcoran; James S G Dooley; Séamus Fanning; Brigid Lucey; Motoo Matsuda; David A McDowell; Francis Mégraud; B Cherie Millar; Rebecca O'Mahony; Lisa O'Riordan; Michele O'Rourke; Juluri R Rao; Paul J Rooney; Andrew Sails; Paul Whyte
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.683

6.  Are happy chickens safer chickens? Poultry welfare and disease susceptibility.

Authors:  Tom Humphrey
Journal:  Br Poult Sci       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.095

Review 7.  Human campylobacteriosis in developing countries.

Authors:  Akitoye O Coker; Raphael D Isokpehi; Bolaji N Thomas; Kehinde O Amisu; C Larry Obi
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.883

8.  Identification of campylobacteria isolated from Danish broilers by phenotypic tests and species-specific PCR assays.

Authors:  M Wainø; D D Bang; M Lund; S Nordentoft; J S Andersen; K Pedersen; M Madsen
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.772

9.  Enrichment followed by quantitative PCR both for rapid detection and as a tool for quantitative risk assessment of food-borne thermotolerant campylobacters.

Authors:  M H Josefsen; N R Jacobsen; J Hoorfar
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Toward an international standard for PCR-based detection of food-borne thermotolerant Campylobacters: assay development and analytical validation.

Authors:  P S Lübeck; P Wolffs; S L W On; P Ahrens; P Rådström; J Hoorfar
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  7 in total

1.  Emission Sources of Campylobacter from Agricultural Farms, Impact on Environmental Contamination and Intervention Strategies.

Authors:  Vanessa Szott; Anika Friese
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.291

2.  A Multicenter Proposal for a Fast Tool To Screen Biosecure Chicken Flocks for the Foodborne Pathogen Campylobacter.

Authors:  Jeffrey Hoorfar; Ivana Koláčková; Gro S Johannessen; Giuliano Garofolo; Francesca Marotta; Kinga Wieczorek; Jacek Osek; Mona Torp; Bjørn Spilsberg; Camilla Sekse; Natasia Rebekka Thornval; Renáta Karpíšková
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Quantification of dust-borne transmission of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus between chickens.

Authors:  Dieuwertje Spekreijse; Annemarie Bouma; Guus Koch; Arjan Stegeman
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 4.380

4.  Effects of dry whey powder and calcium butyrate supplementation of corn/soybean-based diets on productive performance, duodenal histological integrity, and Campylobacter colonization in broilers.

Authors:  Medelin Ocejo; Beatriz Oporto; Ramón A Juste; Ana Hurtado
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  A Sensitive, Specific and Simple Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplification Method for Rapid Detection of Campylobacter spp. in Broiler Production.

Authors:  Than Linh Quyen; Steen Nordentoft; Aaydha Chidambara Vinayaka; Tien Anh Ngo; Pia Engelsmenn; Yi Sun; Mogens Madsen; Dang Duong Bang; Anders Wolff
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Monitoring of Campylobacter jejuni in a chicken infection model by measuring specific volatile organic compounds and by qPCR.

Authors:  Julia Hankel; Timothy Gibson; Julia Skov; Karsten Brandt Andersen; Michelle Dargatz; Andreas Kappel; Frank Thiemann; Ben Curtis; Bussarakam Chuppava; Christian Visscher
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 7.  Particle size and pathogenicity in the respiratory tract.

Authors:  Richard James Thomas
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 5.882

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.