| Literature DB >> 31182618 |
Lumena Louis1,2, Megan Clark3, Megan C Wise4, Nelson Glennie3, Andrea Wong3, Kate Broderick4, Jude Uzonna5, David B Weiner6,2, Phillip Scott7.
Abstract
Vaccination remains one of the greatest medical breakthroughs in human history and has resulted in the near eradication of many formerly lethal diseases in many countries, including the complete eradication of smallpox. However, there remain a number of diseases for which there are no or only partially effective vaccines. There are numerous hurdles in vaccine development, of which knowing the appropriate immune response to target is one of them. Recently, tissue-resident T cells have been shown to mediate high levels of protection for several infections, although the best way to induce these cells is still unclear. Here we compare the ability to generate skin-resident T cells in sites distant from the immunization site following intramuscular and intradermal injection using optimized synthetic DNA vaccines. We found that mice immunized intradermally with a synthetic consensus DNA HIV envelope vaccine by electroporation (EP) are better able to maintain durable antigen-specific cellular responses in the skin than mice immunized by the intramuscular route. We extended these studies by delivering a synthetic DNA vaccine encoding Leishmania glycosomal phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) by EP and again found that the intradermal route was superior to the intramuscular route for generating skin-resident PEPCK-specific T cells. We observed that when challenged with Leishmania major parasites, mice immunized intradermally exhibited significant protection, while mice immunized intramuscularly did not. The protection seen in intradermally vaccinated mice supports the viability of this platform not only to generate skin-resident T cells but also to promote durable protective immune responses at relevant tissue sites.Entities:
Keywords: DNA vaccines; Leishmaniazzm321990; PEPCK; SEP; intradermal
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31182618 PMCID: PMC6652766 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00227-19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Immun ISSN: 0019-9567 Impact factor: 3.441