Literature DB >> 19198841

Spontaneous capture of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) chloroplasts by wild B. rapa: implications for the use of chloroplast transformation for biocontainment.

Nadia Haider1, Joel Allainguillaume, Mike J Wilkinson.   

Abstract

Environmental concerns over the cultivation of Genetically Modified (GM) crops largely centre on the ecological consequences following gene flow to wild relatives. One attractive solution is to deploy biocontainment measures that prevent hybridization. Chloroplast transformation is the most advanced biocontainment method but is compromised by chloroplast capture (hybridization through the maternal lineage). To date, however, there is a paucity of information on the frequency of chloroplast capture in the wild. Oilseed rape (Brassica napus, AACC) frequently hybridises with wild Brassica rapa (AA, as paternal parent) and yields B. rapa-like introgressed individuals after only two generations. In this study we used chloroplast CAPS markers that differentiate between the two species to survey wild and weedy populations of B. rapa for the capture of B. napus chloroplasts. A total of 464 B. rapa plants belonging to 14 populations growing either in close proximity to B. napus (i.e. sympatric <5 m) or else were allopatric from the crop (>1 km) were assessed for chloroplast capture using PCR (trnL-F) and CAPS (trnT-L-Xba I) markers. The screen revealed that two sympatric B. rapa populations included 53 plants that possessed the chloroplast of B. napus. In order to discount these B. rapa plants as F(1) crop-wild hybrids, we used a C-genome-specific marker and found that 45 out of 53 plants lacked the C-genome and so were at least second generation introgressants. The most plausible explanation is that these individuals represent multiple cases of chloroplast capture following introgressive hybridisation through the female germ line from the crop. The abundance of such plants in sympatric sites thereby questions whether the use of chloroplast transformation would provide a sufficient biocontainment for GM oilseed rape in the United Kingdom.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19198841     DOI: 10.1007/s00294-009-0230-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Genet        ISSN: 0172-8083            Impact factor:   3.886


  51 in total

Review 1.  Molecular strategies for gene containment in transgenic crops.

Authors:  Henry Daniell
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Terminator no solution to gene flow.

Authors:  Hope Shand
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Male sterility in transgenic tobacco plants induced by tapetum-specific deacetylation of the externally applied non-toxic compound N-acetyl-L-phosphinothricin.

Authors:  G Kriete; K Niehaus; A M Perlick; A Pühler; I Broer
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 6.417

4.  Determining the transgene containment level provided by chloroplast transformation.

Authors:  Stephanie Ruf; Daniel Karcher; Ralph Bock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Low probability of chloroplast movement from oilseed rape (Brassica napus) into wild Brassica rapa.

Authors:  S E Scott; M J Wilkinson
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Plastid engineering in land plants: a conservative genome is open to change.

Authors:  P Maliga; H Carrer; I Kanevski; J Staub; Z Svab
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1993-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Direct selection for paternal inheritance of chloroplasts in sexual progeny of Nicotiana.

Authors:  A Avni; M Edelman
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1991-02

8.  Generation of fertile transplastomic soybean.

Authors:  Nathalie Dufourmantel; Bernard Pelissier; Frederic Garçon; Gilles Peltier; Jean-Marc Ferullo; Ghislaine Tissot
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.076

9.  Hybridization between transgenic Brassica napus L. and its wild relatives: Brassica rapa L., Raphanus raphanistrum L., Sinapis arvensis L., and Erucastrum gallicum (Willd.) O.E. Schulz.

Authors:  S I Warwick; M-J Simard; A Légère; H J Beckie; L Braun; B Zhu; P Mason; G Séguin-Swartz; C N Stewart
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2003-04-30       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Phytoremediation of organomercurial compounds via chloroplast genetic engineering.

Authors:  Oscar N Ruiz; Hussein S Hussein; Norman Terry; Henry Daniell
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.340

View more
  3 in total

1.  Seed bank dynamics govern persistence of Brassica hybrids in crop and natural habitats.

Authors:  Danny A P Hooftman; James M Bullock; Kathryn Morley; Caroline Lamb; David J Hodgson; Philippa Bell; Jane Thomas; Rosemary S Hails
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  A double built-in containment strategy for production of recombinant proteins in transgenic rice.

Authors:  Xianwen Zhang; Dongfang Wang; Sinan Zhao; Zhicheng Shen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Advances and Perspectives in Tissue Culture and Genetic Engineering of Cannabis.

Authors:  Mohsen Hesami; Austin Baiton; Milad Alizadeh; Marco Pepe; Davoud Torkamaneh; Andrew Maxwell Phineas Jones
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.