Literature DB >> 12721639

Hybridization between transgenic Brassica napus L. and its wild relatives: Brassica rapa L., Raphanus raphanistrum L., Sinapis arvensis L., and Erucastrum gallicum (Willd.) O.E. Schulz.

S I Warwick1, M-J Simard, A Légère, H J Beckie, L Braun, B Zhu, P Mason, G Séguin-Swartz, C N Stewart.   

Abstract

The frequency of gene flow from Brassica napus L. (canola) to four wild relatives, Brassica rapa L., Raphanus raphanistrum L., Sinapis arvensis L. and Erucastrum gallicum (Willd.) O.E. Schulz, was assessed in greenhouse and/or field experiments, and actual rates measured in commercial fields in Canada. Various marker systems were used to detect hybrid individuals: herbicide resistance traits (HR), green fluorescent protein marker (GFP), species-specific amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs) and ploidy level. Hybridization between B. rapa and B. napus occurred in two field experiments (frequency approximately 7%) and in wild populations in commercial fields (approximately 13.6%). The higher frequency in commercial fields was most likely due to greater distance between B. rapa plants. All F(1) hybrids were morphologically similar to B. rapa, had B. napus- and B. rapa-specific AFLP markers and were triploid (AAC, 2n=29 chromosomes). They had reduced pollen viability (about 55%) and segregated for both self-incompatible and self-compatible individuals (the latter being a B. napus trait). In contrast, gene flow between R. raphanistrum and B. napus was very rare. A single R. raphanistrum x B. napus F1 hybrid was detected in 32,821 seedlings from the HR B. napus field experiment. The hybrid was morphologically similar to R. raphanistrum except for the presence of valves, a B. napus trait, in the distorted seed pods. It had a genomic structure consistent with the fusion of an unreduced gamete of R. raphanistrum and a reduced gamete of B. napus (RrRrAC, 2n=37), both B. napus- and R. raphanistrum-specific AFLP markers, and had <1% pollen viability. No hybrids were detected in the greenhouse experiments (1,534 seedlings), the GFP field experiment (4,059 seedlings) or in commercial fields in Québec and Alberta (22,114 seedlings). No S. arvensis or E. gallicum x B. napus hybrids were detected (42,828 and 21,841 seedlings, respectively) from commercial fields in Saskatchewan. These findings suggest that the probability of gene flow from transgenic B. napus to R. raphanistrum, S. arvensis or E. gallicum is very low (<2-5 x 10(-5)). However, transgenes can disperse in the environment via wild B. rapa in eastern Canada and possibly via commercial B. rapa volunteers in western Canada.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12721639     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-003-1278-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  6 in total

1.  Transgenic crops why gene flow matters.

Authors:  Allison A Snow
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Bt-transgenic oilseed rape hybridization with its weedy relative, Brassica rapa.

Authors:  Matthew D Halfhill; Reginald J Millwood; Paul L Raymer; C Neal Stewart
Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res       Date:  2002-10

3.  AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting.

Authors:  P Vos; R Hogers; M Bleeker; M Reijans; T van de Lee; M Hornes; A Frijters; J Pot; J Peleman; M Kuiper
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1995-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Barriers to gene flow from oilseed rape (Brassica napus) into populations of Sinapis arvensis.

Authors:  C L Moyes; J M Lilley; C A Casais; S G Cole; P D Haeger; P J Dale
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Effect of oilseed rape genotype on the spontaneous hybridization rate with a weedy species:an assessment of transgene dispersal.

Authors:  A Baranger; A M Chèvre; F Eber; M Renard
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Spontaneous hybridization between a male-sterile oilseed rape and two weeds.

Authors:  F Eber; A M Chèvre; A Baranger; P Vallée; X Tanguy; M Renard
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.699

  6 in total
  46 in total

1.  Sustainable use of biotechnology for bioenergy feedstocks.

Authors:  Hong S Moon; Jason M Abercrombie; Albert P Kausch; C Neal Stewart
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Novel insect resistance in Brassica napus developed by transformation of chitinase and scorpion toxin genes.

Authors:  Jingxue Wang; Zhenlang Chen; Jianzhong Du; Yi Sun; Aihua Liang
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 4.570

Review 3.  Feral genetically modified herbicide tolerant oilseed rape from seed import spills: are concerns scientifically justified?

Authors:  Yann Devos; Rosemary S Hails; Antoine Messéan; Joe N Perry; Geoffrey R Squire
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  Introgression of an imidazolinone-resistance gene from winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) into jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica Host).

Authors:  Alejandro Perez-Jones; Carol A Mallory-Smith; Jennifer L Hansen; Robert S Zemetra
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2006-10-21       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Spontaneous gene flow from rapeseed (Brassica napus) to wild Brassica oleracea.

Authors:  Caroline S Ford; Joël Allainguillaume; Phil Grilli-Chantler; Giulia Cuccato; Charlotte J Allender; Mike J Wilkinson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Molecular markers as a complementary tool in risk assessments: quantifying interspecific gene flow from triticale to spring wheat and durum wheat.

Authors:  Vanessa B Kavanagh; Melissa J Hills; Aakash Goyal; Harpinder S Randhawa; A Keith Topinka; Francois Eudes; Linda M Hall
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.788

7.  Assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape 73496 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2012-109).

Authors:  Hanspeter Naegeli; Jean-Louis Bresson; Tamas Dalmay; Ian Crawford Dewhurst; Michelle M Epstein; Leslie George Firbank; Philippe Guerche; Jan Hejatko; Francisco Javier Moreno; Ewen Mullins; Fabien Nogué; Nils Rostoks; Jose Juan Sánchez Serrano; Giovanni Savoini; Eve Veromann; Fabio Veronesi; Michele Ardizzone; Yann Devos; Silvia Federici; Antonio Fernandez Dumont; Andrea Gennaro; Jose Ángel Gómez Ruiz; Franco Maria Neri; Nikoletta Papadopoulou; Konstantinos Paraskevopoulos; Anna Lanzoni
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-06-17

8.  Molecular differentiation of commercial varieties and feral populations of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.).

Authors:  Kathrin Pascher; Susanne Macalka; Domenico Rau; Günter Gollmann; Helmut Reiner; Josef Glössl; Georg Grabherr
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  IMI resistance associated to crop-weed hybridization in a natural Brassica rapa population: characterization and fate.

Authors:  M S Ureta; F Torres Carbonell; C Pandolfo; A D Presotto; M A Cantamutto; M Poverene
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 2.513

10.  Genetic load and transgenic mitigating genes in transgenic Brassica rapa (field mustard) x Brassica napus (oilseed rape) hybrid populations.

Authors:  Christy W Rose; Reginald J Millwood; Hong S Moon; Murali R Rao; Matthew D Halfhill; Paul L Raymer; Suzanne I Warwick; Hani Al-Ahmad; Jonathan Gressel; C Neal Stewart
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 2.563

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.