CONTEXT: Complex coagulation test panels ordered by clinicians are typically reported to clinicians without a patient-specific interpretive paragraph. OBJECTIVES: To survey clinicians regarding pathologist-generated interpretations of complex laboratory testing panels and to assess the ability of the interpretations to educate test orderers. DESIGN: Surveys were conducted of physicians ordering complex coagulation laboratory testing that included narrative interpretation. Evaluation of order requisitions was performed to assess the interpretation's influence on ordering practices. SETTING: Physicians ordering coagulation testing at a large academic medical center hospital in Boston, Mass, and physicians from outside hospitals using the academic medical center as a reference laboratory for coagulation testing. OUTCOME MEASURES: Physician surveys and evaluation of laboratory requisition slips. RESULTS: In nearly 80% of responses, the ordering clinicians perceived that the interpretive comments saved them time and improved the diagnostic process. Moreover, the interpretations were perceived by ordering clinicians to help prevent a misdiagnosis or otherwise impact the differential diagnosis in approximately 70% of responses. In addition, interpretations appeared to be able to train the ordering clinicians as to the standard ordering practices. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate physician satisfaction with an innovative information delivery approach that provides laboratory diagnostic interpretation and test-ordering education to clinicians in the context of their daily workflow.
CONTEXT: Complex coagulation test panels ordered by clinicians are typically reported to clinicians without a patient-specific interpretive paragraph. OBJECTIVES: To survey clinicians regarding pathologist-generated interpretations of complex laboratory testing panels and to assess the ability of the interpretations to educate test orderers. DESIGN: Surveys were conducted of physicians ordering complex coagulation laboratory testing that included narrative interpretation. Evaluation of order requisitions was performed to assess the interpretation's influence on ordering practices. SETTING: Physicians ordering coagulation testing at a large academic medical center hospital in Boston, Mass, and physicians from outside hospitals using the academic medical center as a reference laboratory for coagulation testing. OUTCOME MEASURES: Physician surveys and evaluation of laboratory requisition slips. RESULTS: In nearly 80% of responses, the ordering clinicians perceived that the interpretive comments saved them time and improved the diagnostic process. Moreover, the interpretations were perceived by ordering clinicians to help prevent a misdiagnosis or otherwise impact the differential diagnosis in approximately 70% of responses. In addition, interpretations appeared to be able to train the ordering clinicians as to the standard ordering practices. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate physician satisfaction with an innovative information delivery approach that provides laboratory diagnostic interpretation and test-ordering education to clinicians in the context of their daily workflow.
Authors: Ira M Lubin; Margaret M McGovern; Zoe Gibson; Susan J Gross; Elaine Lyon; Roberta A Pagon; Victoria M Pratt; Jamila Rashid; Colleen Shaw; Lander Stoddard; Tracy L Trotter; Marc S Williams; Jean Amos Wilson; Kenneth Pass Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2009-02-05 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Ira M Lubin; Michele Caggana; Carolyn Constantin; Susan J Gross; Elaine Lyon; Roberta A Pagon; Tracy L Trotter; Jean Amos Wilson; Margaret M McGovern Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2008-07-31 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: David S McClintock; Bruce P Levy; William J Lane; Roy E Lee; Jason M Baron; Veronica E Klepeis; Maristela L Onozato; Jiyeon Kim; Anand S Dighe; Bruce A Beckwith; Frank Kuo; Stephen Black-Schaffer; John R Gilbertson Journal: J Pathol Inform Date: 2012-08-30