Literature DB >> 19194863

Multi-constraint computational design suggests that native sequences of germline antibody H3 loops are nearly optimal for conformational flexibility.

Mariana Babor1, Tanja Kortemme.   

Abstract

The limited size of the germline antibody repertoire has to recognize a far larger number of potential antigens. The ability of a single antibody to bind multiple ligands due to conformational flexibility in the antigen-binding site can significantly enlarge the repertoire. Among the six complementarity determining regions (CDRs) that generally comprise the binding site, the CDR H3 loop is particularly variable. Computational protein design studies showed that predicted low energy sequences compatible with a given backbone structure often have considerable similarity to the corresponding native sequences of naturally occurring proteins, indicating that native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. Here, we take a step forward to determine whether conformational flexibility, believed to play a key functional role in germline antibodies, is also central in shaping their native sequence. In particular, we use a multi-constraint computational design strategy, along with the Rosetta scoring function, to propose that the native sequences of CDR H3 loops from germline antibodies are nearly optimal for conformational flexibility. Moreover, we find that antibody maturation may lead to sequences with a higher degree of optimization for a single conformation, while disfavoring sequences that are intrinsically flexible. In addition, this computational strategy allows us to predict mutations in the CDR H3 loop to stabilize the antigen-bound conformation, a computational mimic of affinity maturation, that may increase antigen binding affinity by preorganizing the antigen binding loop. In vivo affinity maturation data are consistent with our predictions. The method described here can be useful to design antibodies with higher selectivity and affinity by reducing conformational diversity. Copyright 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19194863      PMCID: PMC3978785          DOI: 10.1002/prot.22293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  70 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Conformational effects in biological catalysis: an antibody-catalyzed oxy-cope rearrangement.

Authors:  E C Mundorff; M A Hanson; A Varvak; H Ulrich; P G Schultz; R C Stevens
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  ArchDB: automated protein loop classification as a tool for structural genomics.

Authors:  Jordi Espadaler; Narcis Fernandez-Fuentes; Antonio Hermoso; Enrique Querol; Francesc X Aviles; Michael J E Sternberg; Baldomero Oliva
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  B cell positive selection: road map to the primary repertoire?

Authors:  Michael P Cancro; John F Kearney
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 5.  Computational design of protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Tanja Kortemme; David Baker
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 6.  Simulating protein evolution in sequence and structure space.

Authors:  Yu Xia; Michael Levitt
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.809

7.  Improvement of comparative model accuracy by free-energy optimization along principal components of natural structural variation.

Authors:  Bin Qian; Angel R Ortiz; David Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-10-18       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  De novo protein design. II. Plasticity in sequence space.

Authors:  P Koehl; M Levitt
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-11-12       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Three-dimensional structure of the Fab' fragment of a human immunoglobulin at 2,8-A resolution.

Authors:  R J Poljak; L M Amzel; H P Avey; B L Chen; R P Phizackerley; F Saul
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Anchored periplasmic expression, a versatile technology for the isolation of high-affinity antibodies from Escherichia coli-expressed libraries.

Authors:  Barrett R Harvey; George Georgiou; Andrew Hayhurst; Ki Jun Jeong; Brent L Iverson; Geoffrey K Rogers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-14       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  27 in total

1.  Spatially addressed combinatorial protein libraries for recombinant antibody discovery and optimization.

Authors:  Hongyuan Mao; James J Graziano; Tyson M A Chase; Cornelia A Bentley; Omar A Bazirgan; Neil P Reddy; Byeong Doo Song; Vaughn V Smider
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 2.  Protein binding specificity versus promiscuity.

Authors:  Gideon Schreiber; Amy E Keating
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 6.809

3.  Antibody modeling using the prediction of immunoglobulin structure (PIGS) web server [corrected].

Authors:  Paolo Marcatili; Pier Paolo Olimpieri; Anna Chailyan; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  Structure of the apo anti-influenza CH65 Fab.

Authors:  Peter S Lee; Ashley J Arnell; Ian A Wilson
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 1.056

5.  Accurate Structure Prediction of CDR H3 Loops Enabled by a Novel Structure-Based C-Terminal Constraint.

Authors:  Brian D Weitzner; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  Structure and Dynamics of Stacking Interactions in an Antibody Binding Site.

Authors:  Ramkrishna Adhikary; Jörg Zimmermann; Robyn L Stanfield; Ian A Wilson; Wayne Yu; Masayuki Oda; Floyd E Romesberg
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Flexible backbone sampling methods to model and design protein alternative conformations.

Authors:  Noah Ollikainen; Colin A Smith; James S Fraser; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 8.  Practically useful: what the Rosetta protein modeling suite can do for you.

Authors:  Kristian W Kaufmann; Gordon H Lemmon; Samuel L Deluca; Jonathan H Sheehan; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  The Unusual Genetics and Biochemistry of Bovine Immunoglobulins.

Authors:  Robyn L Stanfield; Jeremy Haakenson; Thaddeus C Deiss; Michael F Criscitiello; Ian A Wilson; Vaughn V Smider
Journal:  Adv Immunol       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.543

10.  Preconfiguration of the antigen-binding site during affinity maturation of a broadly neutralizing influenza virus antibody.

Authors:  Aaron G Schmidt; Huafeng Xu; Amir R Khan; Timothy O'Donnell; Surender Khurana; Lisa R King; Jody Manischewitz; Hana Golding; Pirada Suphaphiphat; Andrea Carfi; Ethan C Settembre; Philip R Dormitzer; Thomas B Kepler; Ruijun Zhang; M Anthony Moody; Barton F Haynes; Hua-Xin Liao; David E Shaw; Stephen C Harrison
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.