Literature DB >> 23422426

Flexible backbone sampling methods to model and design protein alternative conformations.

Noah Ollikainen1, Colin A Smith, James S Fraser, Tanja Kortemme.   

Abstract

Sampling alternative conformations is key to understanding how proteins work and engineering them for new functions. However, accurately characterizing and modeling protein conformational ensembles remain experimentally and computationally challenging. These challenges must be met before protein conformational heterogeneity can be exploited in protein engineering and design. Here, as a stepping stone, we describe methods to detect alternative conformations in proteins and strategies to model these near-native conformational changes based on backrub-type Monte Carlo moves in Rosetta. We illustrate how Rosetta simulations that apply backrub moves improve modeling of point mutant side-chain conformations, native side-chain conformational heterogeneity, functional conformational changes, tolerated sequence space, protein interaction specificity, and amino acid covariation across protein-protein interfaces. We include relevant Rosetta command lines and RosettaScripts to encourage the application of these types of simulations to other systems. Our work highlights that critical scoring and sampling improvements will be necessary to approximate conformational landscapes. Challenges for the future development of these methods include modeling conformational changes that propagate away from designed mutation sites and modulating backbone flexibility to predictively design functionally important conformational heterogeneity.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23422426      PMCID: PMC3750959          DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394292-0.00004-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Enzymol        ISSN: 0076-6879            Impact factor:   1.600


  49 in total

1.  A transient and low-populated protein-folding intermediate at atomic resolution.

Authors:  Dmitry M Korzhnev; Tomasz L Religa; Wiktor Banachewicz; Alan R Fersht; Lewis E Kay
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Structure-based prediction of the peptide sequence space recognized by natural and synthetic PDZ domains.

Authors:  Colin A Smith; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Alternate states of proteins revealed by detailed energy landscape mapping.

Authors:  Michael D Tyka; Daniel A Keedy; Ingemar André; Frank Dimaio; Yifan Song; David C Richardson; Jane S Richardson; David Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Assessment of protein structure refinement in CASP9.

Authors:  Justin L MacCallum; Alberto Pérez; Michael J Schnieders; Lan Hua; Matthew P Jacobson; Ken A Dill
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-08-30

5.  Accessing protein conformational ensembles using room-temperature X-ray crystallography.

Authors:  James S Fraser; Henry van den Bedem; Avi J Samelson; P Therese Lang; James M Holton; Nathaniel Echols; Tom Alber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Studying binding specificities of peptide recognition modules by high-throughput phage display selections.

Authors:  Haiming Huang; Sachdev S Sidhu
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2011

7.  ROSETTA3: an object-oriented software suite for the simulation and design of macromolecules.

Authors:  Andrew Leaver-Fay; Michael Tyka; Steven M Lewis; Oliver F Lange; James Thompson; Ron Jacak; Kristian Kaufman; P Douglas Renfrew; Colin A Smith; Will Sheffler; Ian W Davis; Seth Cooper; Adrien Treuille; Daniel J Mandell; Florian Richter; Yih-En Andrew Ban; Sarel J Fleishman; Jacob E Corn; David E Kim; Sergey Lyskov; Monica Berrondo; Stuart Mentzer; Zoran Popović; James J Havranek; John Karanicolas; Rhiju Das; Jens Meiler; Tanja Kortemme; Jeffrey J Gray; Brian Kuhlman; David Baker; Philip Bradley
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.600

8.  Solution structure of a minor and transiently formed state of a T4 lysozyme mutant.

Authors:  Guillaume Bouvignies; Pramodh Vallurupalli; D Flemming Hansen; Bruno E Correia; Oliver Lange; Alaji Bah; Robert M Vernon; Frederick W Dahlquist; David Baker; Lewis E Kay
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-08-21       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Predicting the tolerated sequences for proteins and protein interfaces using RosettaBackrub flexible backbone design.

Authors:  Colin A Smith; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  RosettaScripts: a scripting language interface to the Rosetta macromolecular modeling suite.

Authors:  Sarel J Fleishman; Andrew Leaver-Fay; Jacob E Corn; Eva-Maria Strauch; Sagar D Khare; Nobuyasu Koga; Justin Ashworth; Paul Murphy; Florian Richter; Gordon Lemmon; Jens Meiler; David Baker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  20 in total

1.  Incorporating an allosteric regulatory site in an antibody through backbone design.

Authors:  Olga Khersonsky; Sarel J Fleishman
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Optimization of rotamers prior to template minimization improves stability predictions made by computational protein design.

Authors:  James A Davey; Roberto A Chica
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  FASPR: an open-source tool for fast and accurate protein side-chain packing.

Authors:  Xiaoqiang Huang; Robin Pearce; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Comparison of Rosetta flexible-backbone computational protein design methods on binding interactions.

Authors:  Amanda L Loshbaugh; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-08-10

5.  An Evolution-Based Approach to De Novo Protein Design.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Brender; David Shultis; Naureen Aslam Khattak; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2017

6.  Expanding the space of protein geometries by computational design of de novo fold families.

Authors:  Xingjie Pan; Michael C Thompson; Yang Zhang; Lin Liu; James S Fraser; Mark J S Kelly; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Synthetic beta-solenoid proteins with the fragment-free computational design of a beta-hairpin extension.

Authors:  James T MacDonald; Burak V Kabasakal; David Godding; Sebastian Kraatz; Louie Henderson; James Barber; Paul S Freemont; James W Murray
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  A Minireview on Temperature Dependent Protein Conformational Sampling.

Authors:  Ming Dong
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 2.371

9.  IsAb: a computational protocol for antibody design.

Authors:  Tianjian Liang; Hui Chen; Jiayi Yuan; Chen Jiang; Yixuan Hao; Yuanqiang Wang; Zhiwei Feng; Xiang-Qun Xie
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 11.622

Review 10.  Why reinvent the wheel? Building new proteins based on ready-made parts.

Authors:  Olga Khersonsky; Sarel J Fleishman
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.