Literature DB >> 6933852

Variation in morphology of the maxillary central incisors found in class II, division 2 malocclusions.

H P Delivanis, M M Kuftinec.   

Abstract

Class II, Division 2 malocclusions show several common characteristics. One of the features is the presence of a deep overbite ("deckbiss"), which can be the result of an excessive eruption of the maxillary central incisors. This study tested the theory that the deep overbite, together with the apparent entrapment of the mandible, may be partly due to the bending of the maxillary central incisors or the presence of the Collum angle. In a comparison between the group of patients with Class II. Division 2 malocclusions and the control group, it was determined that the former group exhibited significantly larger Collum angles than the latter group (p < 0.005). It is suggested that in describing the maxillary incisor angulation in this type of malocclusion, the long axis of the crown, rather than the long axis of the tooth connecting the incisal edge to the apex, be used as a measure of their position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6933852     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(80)90024-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod        ISSN: 0002-9416


  8 in total

1.  Class II division 2 treatment--does skeletal maturity influence success and stability?

Authors:  N C Bock; S Ruf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  [Class II Division 2 malocclusion in adults without premolar extraction].

Authors:  M Farmand
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1988-02

3.  Cone Beam Computerized Tomographic Analysis of Collum Angle of the Maxillary Central Incisors in Different Types of Malocclusion: Comparative Assessment in Saudi, Jordan and Egypt Subpopulation.

Authors:  Rakhi Issrani; Namdeo Prabhu; Sunitha Siddanna; Sarah Hatab Alanazi; Mohammad Khursheed Alam; Manay Srinivas Munisekhar; May Othman Hamza; Reham Fawzi Dawood Shabanah; Rasha Saleh Ali Gadh
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-20

4.  Facial profile and lip position changes in adult Class II, Division 2 subjects treated with the Herbst-Multibracket appliance. A radiographic cephalometric pilot study.

Authors:  Niko Christian Bock; Christina Santo; Hans Pancherz
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Torque differences due to the material variation of the orthodontic appliance: a finite element study.

Authors:  Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Ludger Keilig; Vaska Vandevska-Radunovic; Theodore Eliades; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 2.750

6.  Controlling incisor torque with completely customized lingual appliances.

Authors:  Ons Alouini; Michael Knösel; Moritz Blanck-Lubarsch; Hans-Joachim Helms; Dirk Wiechmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  The variation in crown-root morphology of anterior teeth assessed with cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Xiao-Ming Wang; Ling-Zhi Ma; Mei-Fang Yan; Jun Zheng; Mi Wang; Xue Hui
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2022-05-06

8.  Comparative tomographic study of the maxillary central incisor collum angle between Class I, Class II, division 1 and 2 patients.

Authors:  Murilo Fernando Neuppmann Feres; Bianca Santana Rozolen; Adel Alhadlaq; Thamer A Alkhadra; Tarek El-Bialy
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2018-02-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.