Literature DB >> 19192941

Sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate: a review of its use as a colorectal cleanser.

Sheridan M Hoy1, Lesley J Scott, Antona J Wagstaff.   

Abstract

Oral sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate (CitraFleet; Picolax), consisting of sodium picosulfate (a stimulant laxative) and magnesium citrate (an osmotic laxative), is approved for use in adults (CitraFleet; Picolax) and/or adolescents and children (Picolax) as a colorectal cleansing agent prior to any diagnostic procedure (e.g. colonoscopy or x-ray examination) requiring a clean bowel and/or surgery. It is dispensed in powder form (sodium picosulfate 0.01 g, magnesium oxide 3.5 g, citric acid 12.0 g per sachet), with the magnesium oxide and citric acid components forming magnesium citrate when the powder is dissolved in water. In adult patients, two sachets of sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate was at least as effective and well tolerated as oral magnesium citrate 17.7 or 35.4 g, or oral polyethylene glycol 236 g in adult patients undergoing a double-contrast barium enema procedure in three large, randomized, comparative clinical studies. In contrast, sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate was less effective than a sodium phosphate enema preparation in two studies in patients undergoing flexible sigmoidoscopy. A similar number of patients receiving two sachets of sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate or two 45 mL doses of oral sodium phosphate the day before a double-contrast barium enema procedure achieved satisfactory barium coating and none/minimal faecal residue in one study. However, the data from three of these studies should be interpreted with caution because the administrative regimens used differed from that recommended. Sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate is also an effective and generally well tolerated colorectal cleansing agent in children and adolescents; the preparation was more effective than oral bisacodyl 0.01 or 0.02 g plus a sodium phosphate enema preparation in this population. Further research is thus required to accurately position sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate and fully establish its efficacy and tolerability prior to various exploratory or surgical procedures. Nevertheless, oral sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate provides a useful option in the preparation of the colon and rectum in adults, adolescents and children undergoing any diagnostic procedure (e.g. colonoscopy or x-ray examination) requiring a clean bowel and/or surgery. Oral sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate acts locally in the colon as both a stimulant laxative, by increasing the frequency and the force of peristalsis (sodium picosulfate component), and an osmotic laxative, by retaining fluids in the colon (magnesium citrate component), to clear the colon and rectum of faecal contents. It is not absorbed in any detectable quantities. Sodium picosulfate is a prodrug: it is hydrolyzed by bacteria in the colon to the active metabolite 4,4'-dihydroxydiphenyl-(2-pyridyl)methane. Sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate may be associated with a dehydrating effect, as evidenced by a reduction in bodyweight and increased haemoglobin levels; some at-risk patients may experience postural hypotension and older patients may require additional electrolytes. In three large (n >100), randomized, single-blind clinical studies, two sachets of oral sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate was at least as effective as oral magnesium citrate 17.7 or 35.4 g, or oral polyethylene glycol 236 g as a colorectal cleansing agent in adult patients undergoing a double-contrast barium enema procedure. In contrast, sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate was less effective than a sodium phosphate enema preparation in two studies in patients undergoing flexible sigmoidoscopy. A similar number of patients receiving two sachets of sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate or two 45 mL doses of oral sodium phosphate the day before a double-contrast barium enema procedure achieved satisfactory barium coating and none/minimal faecal residue in one study. However, the data from three of these studies should be interpreted with caution because the administrative regimens used differed from that recommended. In children and adolescents, sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate was significantly more effective as a colorectal cleansing agent than oral bisacodyl 0.01 or 0.02 g plus a sodium phosphate enema preparation in a randomized, single-blind study; dosages were adjusted for age in this study. Oral sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate is generally well tolerated in adult patients undergoing various investigational colorectal procedures. Adverse events were generally mild to moderate in intensity and mainly gastrointestinal in nature (e.g. abdominal cramps/pain, nausea); other common treatment-emergent adverse events included disturbance of daily activity, headache and sleep disturbance. This combination is at least as well tolerated as oral sodium phosphate or oral polyethylene glycol, with moderate/severe nausea and vomiting occurring less frequently in sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate recipients than in those receiving oral sodium phosphate, and abdominal bloating/pain and nausea developing less often with sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate than polyethylene glycol therapy. The incidence of abdominal pain and sleep disturbance in sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate versus oral magnesium citrate recipients was similar in one study, but significantly lower with sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate in another. While the incidence of most adverse events was similar in recipients of sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate and a sodium phosphate enema preparation, more patients receiving sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate reported moderate/severe flatulence, incontinence and sleep disturbance, and more patients receiving the enema preparation reported rectal soreness. The tolerability profile of sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate in patients aged >70 years is reportedly similar to that in patients aged <70 years. Abdominal pain also occurred less frequently with sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate than with oral bisacodyl plus a sodium phosphate enema preparation in children and adolescents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19192941     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-200969010-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  29 in total

1.  Technology Status Evaluation report. Colonoscopy preparations. May 2001.

Authors:  D B Nelson; A N Barkun; K P Block; J S Burdick; G G Ginsberg; D A Greenwald; P B Kelsey; N L Nakao; A Slivka; P Smith; N Vakil
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 2.  Bowel preparation for colorectal surgery.

Authors:  O Zmora; A J Pikarsky; S D Wexner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 3.  Systematic review: oral bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  J Belsey; O Epstein; D Heresbach
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 8.171

4.  Randomised trial of two pharmacological methods of bowel preparation for day case colonoscopy.

Authors:  A Pinfield; M D Stringer
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Barium enema preparation: a study of low-residue diet, "Picolax' and 'Kleen-Prep'.

Authors:  S Hawkins; P Bezuidenhout; P Shorvon; A Hine
Journal:  Australas Radiol       Date:  1996-08

6.  Plasma magnesium should be monitored perioperatively in patients undergoing colorectal resection.

Authors:  M D Evans; K Barton; G A Pritchard; E J Williams; S S Karandikar
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 3.788

7.  A comparative trial of magnesium citrate (Citramag) and Picolax for barium enema bowel preparation.

Authors:  M J Swarbrick; M C Collins; D J Moore; K D McBride
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.350

8.  The role of intestinal bacteria in the transformation of sodium picosulfate.

Authors:  D H Kim; S H Hyun; S B Shim; K Kobashi
Journal:  Jpn J Pharmacol       Date:  1992-05

9.  Picoprep-3 is a superior colonoscopy preparation to Fleet: a randomized, controlled trial comparing the two bowel preparations.

Authors:  Liu-Ming Schmidt; Pamela Williams; Denis King; Dayashan Perera
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Single blind, randomised trial of efficacy and acceptability of oral picolax versus self administered phosphate enema in bowel preparation for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening.

Authors:  W S Atkin; A Hart; R Edwards; C F Cook; J Wardle; P McIntyre; R Aubrey; C Baron; S Sutton; J Cuzick; A Senapati; J M Northover
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-03
View more
  32 in total

1.  Effectiveness of Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate (PICO) for Colonoscopy Preparation.

Authors:  Ki Hwan Song; Wu Seok Suh; Jin Sik Jeong; Dong Sik Kim; Sang Woo Kim; Dong Min Kwak; Jong Seong Hwang; Hyun Jin Kim; Man Woo Park; Min Chul Shim; Ja-Il Koo; Jae Hwang Kim; Dae Ho Shon
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2014-10-28

2.  Recurrent pancreatitis after unremarkable colonoscopy, temporalised by CT imaging: an unusual case.

Authors:  Christopher Limb; Ibrahim A K Ibrahim; Sophie Fitzsimmons; Ashton J Harper
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2016-01-08

Review 3.  Adjuncts to colonic cleansing before colonoscopy.

Authors:  Sanghoon Park; Yun Jeong Lim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  A randomized trial to compare the efficacy and tolerability of sodium picosulfate-magnesium citrate solution vs. 4 L polyethylene glycol solution as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Miguel Muñoz-Navas; José Luis Calleja; Guillermo Payeras; Antonio José Hervás; Luis Esteban Abreu; Víctor Orive; Pedro L Menchén; José María Bordas; José Ramón Armengol; Cristina Carretero; Vicente Pons Beltrán; Inmaculada Alonso-Abreu; Román Manteca; Adolfo Parra-Blanco; Fernando Carballo; Juan Manuel Herrerías; Carlos Badiola
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Efficacy and tolerability of 2-L polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid versus sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Seung In Seo; Jin Gu Kang; Hyoung Su Kim; Myoung Kuk Jang; Hak Yang Kim; Woon Geon Shin
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Comparison of two common outpatient preparations for colonoscopy in children and youth.

Authors:  Carolina Jimenez-Rivera; Donna Haas; Margaret Boland; Janice L Barkey; David R Mack
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 7.  Combination could be another tool for bowel preparation?

Authors:  Jae Seung Soh; Kyung-Jo Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Polyethylene glycol versus sodium picosulfalte bowel preparation in the setting of a colorectal cancer screening program.

Authors:  Omar Kherad; Sophie Restellini; Myriam Martel; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-08-24

Review 9.  Systematic review and meta-analysis: sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate vs. polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy preparation.

Authors:  Zheng Jin; Yi Lu; Yi Zhou; Biao Gong
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Transenteral bowel preparation for colonoscopy is more comfortable than the traditional method with no inferiority in efficacy.

Authors:  Sung-Won Jung; Da Hye Jung; Young Chul Shin; In Ho Moh; Hana Yoo; Sung Il Jang; Su Rin Shin; Jin Bae Kim; Sang Hoon Park; Myung Seok Lee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.