Literature DB >> 10834891

Single blind, randomised trial of efficacy and acceptability of oral picolax versus self administered phosphate enema in bowel preparation for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening.

W S Atkin1, A Hart, R Edwards, C F Cook, J Wardle, P McIntyre, R Aubrey, C Baron, S Sutton, J Cuzick, A Senapati, J M Northover.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the acceptability and efficacy of two methods of self administered bowel preparation for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: a single phosphate enema and a single sachet of Picolax.
DESIGN: Single blind, randomised trial.
SETTING: Endoscopy units of two general hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: 1442 men and women aged 55-64 years who had agreed to be screened by flexible sigmoidoscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MESURESs: Attendance rates, compliance with allocated preparations, adverse effects, quality of bowel preparation, procedure time, and yield of neoplasia.
RESULTS: Compliance with the enema was higher than with the Picolax (608 (84%) v 566 (79%); difference 6%, 95% confidence interval 2% to 10%). Almost half of those who refused Picolax used an enema at home. Wind, incontinence, and sleep disturbance were more frequent in the Picolax group than the enema group; bottom soreness was more frequent in the enema group. Around 30% (187) found the diet restriction required by Picolax difficult; 78% (471) found the enema easy to administer. The quality of preparation was better with the enema; the proportion of procedures complete to the descending colon was greater and the mean duration of the procedure was shorter. There was no significant difference in polyp detection rates.
CONCLUSION: A single phosphate enema self administered around one hour before leaving home is a more acceptable and effective method of preparing the distal bowel for flexible sigmoidoscopy than Picolax.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10834891      PMCID: PMC27392          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  12 in total

1.  Early incontinence following flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  W M Thomas; J Jackson; G L Lamont; J D Hardcastle
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Human rectal mucosa: proctoscopic and morphological changes caused by laxatives.

Authors:  J L Meisel; D Bergman; D Graney; D R Saunders; C E Rubin
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Injury by hypertonic phosphate enema.

Authors:  J B Pietsch; H M Shizgal; J L Meakins
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1977-05-21       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Colorectal ulcers associated with sodium phosphate catharsis.

Authors:  L J Hixson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Bowel preparation for flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  B D Weiss; S Watkins
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 0.493

6.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by once-only sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  W S Atkin; J Cuzick; J M Northover; D K Whynes
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-03-20       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Optimal bowel preparation for flexible sigmoidoscopy--are two enemas better than one?

Authors:  K L Preston; F E Peluso; F Goldner
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Short report: comparison of two orally administered bowel preparations for colonoscopy--polyethylene glycol and sodium picosulphate.

Authors:  M Dakkak; K Aziz; J R Bennett
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 8.171

9.  Population based randomized study of uptake and yield of screening by flexible sigmoidoscopy compared with screening by faecal occult blood testing.

Authors:  J E Verne; R Aubrey; S B Love; I C Talbot; J M Northover
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-07-18

10.  Uptake, yield of neoplasia, and adverse effects of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening.

Authors:  W S Atkin; A Hart; R Edwards; P McIntyre; R Aubrey; J Wardle; S Sutton; J Cuzick; J M Northover
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  16 in total

1.  Informed consent is being neglected.

Authors:  H Goodare; C Williamson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-11-04

2.  Gas insufflation of minimal preparation CT of the colon reduces false-positives.

Authors:  A Slater; M North; M Hart; C Ferrett
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Improving the view during flexible sigmoidoscopy: a systematic review of published randomized, controlled trials comparing the use of oral bowel preparation versus enema bowel preparation.

Authors:  Muhammad Shafique Sajid; Jennifer F Caswell; Mustafa A Q Abbas; Mirza K Baig; Malcolm R McFall
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-04-18

4.  A prospective randomized single-blind comparison of three methods of bowel preparation for outpatient flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  A L Gidwani; R Makar; D Garrett; R Gilliland
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Non-laxative CT colonography with barium-based faecal tagging: is additional phosphate enema beneficial and well tolerated?

Authors:  W Davis; P Nisbet; C Hare; P Cooke; S A Taylor
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  A prospective randomized single blind trial of Fleet phosphate enema versus glycerin suppositories as preparation for flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  D Underwood; R R Makar; A L Gidwani; S M Najfi; P Neilly; R Gilliland
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 7.  Sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate: a review of its use as a colorectal cleanser.

Authors:  Sheridan M Hoy; Lesley J Scott; Antona J Wagstaff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging.

Authors:  Stuart A Taylor; Andrew Slater; David N Burling; Emily Tam; Rebecca Greenhalgh; Louise Gartner; Julia Scarth; Robert Pearce; Paul Bassett; Steve Halligan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Korean guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and polyp detection.

Authors:  Bo-In Lee; Sung Pil Hong; Seong-Eun Kim; Se Hyung Kim; Hyun-Soo Kim; Sung Noh Hong; Dong-Hoon Yang; Sung Jae Shin; Suck-Ho Lee; Dong Il Park; Young-Ho Kim; Hyun Jung Kim; Suk-Kyun Yang; Hyo Jong Kim; Hae Jeong Jeon
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2012-03-31

10.  Factors associated with the efficacy of polyp detection during routine flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  Akash J Maliampurakal; Donald C McMillan; John H Anderson; Paul G Horgan; David Mansouri
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.