Literature DB >> 19190461

Recurrent disc herniation and long-term back pain after primary lumbar discectomy: review of outcomes reported for limited versus aggressive disc removal.

Matthew J McGirt1, Giannina L Garcés Ambrossi, Ghazala Datoo, Daniel M Sciubba, Timothy F Witham, Jean-Paul Wolinsky, Ziya L Gokaslan, Ali Bydon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: It remains unknown whether aggressive disc removal with curettage or limited removal of disc fragment alone with little disc invasion provides a better outcome for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy. We reviewed the literature to determine whether outcomes reported after limited discectomy (LD) differed from those reported after aggressive discectomy (AD) with regard to long-term back pain or recurrent disc herniation.
METHODS: A systematic MEDLINE search was performed to identify all studies published between 1980 and 2007 reporting outcomes after AD or LD for a herniated lumbar disc with radiculopathy. The incidence of short- and long-term recurrent back or leg pain and recurrent disc herniation was assessed from each reported LD or AD cohort and the cumulative incidence compared.
RESULTS: Fifty-four studies (60 discectomy cohorts) met the inclusion criteria, reporting the outcomes of 13 359 patients after lumbar discectomy (LD, 6135 patients; AD, 7224 patients). The reported incidence of short-term recurrent back or leg pain was similar after LD (mean, 14.5%; range, 7-16%) and AD (mean, 14.1%; range, 6-43%) (P < 0.01). However, more than 2 years after surgery, the reported incidence of recurrent back or leg pain was 2.5-fold less after LD (mean, 11.6%; range, 7-16%) compared with AD (mean, 27.8%; range, 19-37%) (P < 0.0001). The reported incidence of recurrent disc herniation after LD (mean, 7%; range, 2-18%) was greater than that reported after AD (mean, 3.5%; range, 0-9.5%) (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Review of the literature demonstrates a greater reported incidence of long-term recurrent back and leg pain after AD but a greater reported incidence of recurrent disc herniation after LD. Prospective, randomized trials are needed to firmly assess this possible difference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19190461     DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000337574.58662.E2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  71 in total

1.  The efficacy of minimally invasive discectomy compared with open discectomy: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Hormuzdiyar H Dasenbrock; Stephen P Juraschek; Lonni R Schultz; Timothy F Witham; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ziya L Gokaslan; Ali Bydon
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-03-09

2.  BMP-2 and TGF-β3 do not prevent spontaneous degeneration in rabbit disc explants but induce ossification of the annulus fibrosus.

Authors:  Daniel Haschtmann; Stephen J Ferguson; Jivko V Stoyanov
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Reoperation after lumbar disc surgery in two hundred and seven patients.

Authors:  Jiwei Cheng; Hongwei Wang; Wenjie Zheng; Changqing Li; Jian Wang; Zhengfeng Zhang; Bo Huang; Yue Zhou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  The evidence on surgical interventions for low back disorders, an overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Wilco C H Jacobs; Sidney M Rubinstein; Paul C Willems; Wouter A Moojen; Ferran Pellisé; Cumhur F Oner; Wilco C Peul; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Risk factors for the need of surgical treatment of a first recurrent lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Ratko Yurac; Juan J Zamorano; Fernando Lira; Diego Valiente; Vicente Ballesteros; Alejandro Urzúa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  [Postoperative spinal column].

Authors:  W Käfer; I Heumüller; N Harsch; C Kraus; W Reith
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Annular closure device breakage due to recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a case report.

Authors:  Benedikt W Burkhardt; Joachim M Oertel
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Intraoperative findings, complications, and short-term results after lumbar microdiscectomy with or without implantation of annular closure device.

Authors:  Jenny C Kienzler; Volkmar Heidecke; Richard Assaker; Javier Fandino; Martin Barth
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 2.216

9.  Injectable cellulose-based hydrogels as nucleus pulposus replacements: Assessment of in vitro structural stability, ex vivo herniation risk, and in vivo biocompatibility.

Authors:  Huizi Anna Lin; Devika M Varma; Warren W Hom; Michelle A Cruz; Philip R Nasser; Robert G Phelps; James C Iatridis; Steven B Nicoll
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2019-04-17

10.  The high-risk discectomy patient: prevention of reherniation in patients with large anular defects using an anular closure device.

Authors:  Gerrit J Bouma; Martin Barth; Darko Ledic; Milorad Vilendecic
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.