Literature DB >> 23377540

The high-risk discectomy patient: prevention of reherniation in patients with large anular defects using an anular closure device.

Gerrit J Bouma1, Martin Barth, Darko Ledic, Milorad Vilendecic.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: With lumbar discectomy for disc herniation, surgeons must choose between limited nucleus removal associated with higher reherniation risk or more aggressive nucleus removal associated with increased back pain and disc degeneration. This trade-off is particularly challenging in patients with large anular defects, which carry the highest risk of reherniation. We examined the effect of an anular closure device on reherniation and clinical outcomes.
METHODS: Seventy-five primary discectomy patients had a limited discectomy followed by implantation of an anular closure device and were followed-up to 2 years. Anular defect size and volume of removed nucleus was recorded at surgery. Reherniations were reported, pain and function were monitored throughout, and imaging was performed at annual visits.
RESULTS: The overall symptomatic reherniation rate was 1.4%, and the asymptomatic reherniation rate was 1.5% at 12 months and 5.1% at 24 months. Both rates compare favorably with literature reports which include symptomatic rates ranging between 2 and 18% (up to 27% for patients with large anular defects) and an asymptomatic rate of 13%.
CONCLUSIONS: The low reherniation rate in patients at high-risk of reherniation based on anular defect size, despite discectomy being only limited, suggests that an anular closure device may reduce reherniation risk. Clinical outcomes for pain and function at 1 and 2 years post-operatively compared favorably with literature reports. Further study in a randomized controlled trial is required to confirm these results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23377540      PMCID: PMC3657060          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2656-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  28 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes of standard discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a follow-up study of more than 10 years.

Authors:  E Yorimitsu; K Chiba; Y Toyama; K Hirabayashi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology. Recommendations of the Combined task Forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology, and American Society of Neuroradiology.

Authors:  D F Fardon; P C Milette
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Asymptomatic same-site recurrent disc herniation after lumbar discectomy: results of a prospective longitudinal study with 2-year serial imaging.

Authors:  Richard L Lebow; Owoicho Adogwa; Scott L Parker; Adrija Sharma; Joseph Cheng; Matthew J McGirt
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Seven- to 20-year outcome of lumbar discectomy.

Authors:  G A Loupasis; K Stamos; P G Katonis; G Sapkas; D S Korres; G Hartofilakidis
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation.

Authors:  H Weber
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Lumbar discectomy. Results with limited disc excision and selective foraminotomy.

Authors:  D M Spengler
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1982 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Reoperations after lumbar disc surgery: a population-based study of regional and interspecialty variations.

Authors:  I Keskimäki; S Seitsalo; H Osterman; P Rissanen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Clinical outcomes after lumbar discectomy for sciatica: the effects of fragment type and anular competence.

Authors:  Eugene J Carragee; Michael Y Han; Patrick W Suen; David Kim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  One-level one-sided lumbar disc surgery with and without microscopic assistance: 1-year outcome in 114 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Kudret Türeyen
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  A prospective controlled study of limited versus subtotal posterior discectomy: short-term outcomes in patients with herniated lumbar intervertebral discs and large posterior anular defect.

Authors:  Eugene J Carragee; Anthony O Spinnickie; Todd F Alamin; Steve Paragioudakis
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  16 in total

1.  Anular closure device: is it necessary after discectomy?

Authors:  Yusuf Izci
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Use of Annular Closure Device (Barricaid®) for Preventing Lumbar Disc Reherniation: One-Year Results of Three Cases.

Authors:  Bang Sang Hahn; Gyu Yeul Ji; Bongju Moon; Dong Ah Shin; Yoon Ha; Keung Nyun Kim; Do Heum Yoon
Journal:  Korean J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-10-31

3.  Risk Factors for Reoperation in Patients Treated Surgically for Intervertebral Disc Herniation: A Subanalysis of Eight-Year SPORT Data.

Authors:  Dante Leven; Peter G Passias; Thomas J Errico; Virginie Lafage; Kristina Bianco; Alexandra Lee; Jon D Lurie; Tor D Tosteson; Wenyan Zhao; Kevin F Spratt; Tamara S Morgan; Michael C Gerling
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Intraoperative findings, complications, and short-term results after lumbar microdiscectomy with or without implantation of annular closure device.

Authors:  Jenny C Kienzler; Volkmar Heidecke; Richard Assaker; Javier Fandino; Martin Barth
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  Effects of Level, Loading Rate, Injury and Repair on Biomechanical Response of Ovine Cervical Intervertebral Discs.

Authors:  Rose G Long; Ivan Zderic; Boyko Gueorguiev; Stephen J Ferguson; Mauro Alini; Sibylle Grad; James C Iatridis
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  A Heterologous Fibrin Glue Enhances the Closure Effect of Surgical Suture on the Repair of Annulus Fibrous Defect in a Sheep Model.

Authors:  Zhi-Cai Du; Li-Xin Zhu
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2019-07-25

7.  Sciatica caused by disc herniation: Why is Chymopapain Chemonucleolysis denied to our patients?

Authors:  Douglas Wardlaw
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-12-31

8.  Risk factors for early reherniation after lumbar discectomy with or without annular closure: results of a multicenter randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Jenny C Kienzler; Javier Fandino; Erik Van de Kelft; Sandro Eustacchio; Gerrit Joan Bouma
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.216

9.  Performance of an Annular Closure Device in a 'Real-World', Heterogeneous, At-Risk, Lumbar Discectomy Population.

Authors:  Adisa Kuršumović; Stefan Rath
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-11-06

Review 10.  Annular closure device for disc herniation: meta-analysis of clinical outcome and complications.

Authors:  Wen Jie Choy; Kevin Phan; Ashish D Diwan; Chon Sum Ong; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.