Literature DB >> 33070235

Intraoperative findings, complications, and short-term results after lumbar microdiscectomy with or without implantation of annular closure device.

Jenny C Kienzler1, Volkmar Heidecke2, Richard Assaker3, Javier Fandino4, Martin Barth5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Standard microscopic lumbar discectomy (MLD) is a short operation with minimal blood loss, and a low rate of peri- and intraoperative complications. The objective of this study was to evaluate intraoperative findings, complications, and early postoperative neurological outcome (< 105 days) in patients undergoing MLD with or without implantation of an annular closure device (ACD).
METHODS: This study is based on data analysis of a post-marketing, prospective, multicenter RCT in Europe including patients undergoing standard MLD with or without implantation of an ACD (Barricaid®, Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc., Woburn, MA). Enrollment of 554 patients in 21 centers in Europe (Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Belgium, The Netherlands, and France) started in 2010 and was completed in October 2014, with 276 patients randomized to the ACD group and 278 to the control group.
RESULTS: Mean operation time was 70 min in the ACD group and 52 min in the control group (p < 0.0001). Intraoperative fluoroscopy time was 24 s in the ACD group and 7 s in the control group (p < 0.0001). Average blood loss was 94.2 ml in the ACD group and 64.7 ml in the control group (p = 0.0001). Serious device- or procedure-related adverse events occurred in 3.7% (10/272) of the ACD group and 7.9% (22/278) of the control group. Dural injuries occurred in 13 (4.8%) patients in the ACD group and 7 (2.5%) in the control group. There was one device-related nerve root injury resulting in a nerve root amputation. Surgical complications included 3 hematomas in the ACD group and 4 in the control group; 3 infections occurred in both groups. Device migrations were documented in 3 patients in the ACD group. Patients in the ACD group (n = 7, 2.6%) underwent fewer reoperations compared with that in the control group (n = 16, 5.8%, OR = 2.3 (0.9-5.7)). Mean VAS leg pain at 3 months was 11.9 in the ACD and 15.1 in the control group, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Short-term outcome after MLD with or without implantation of ACD was similar in both groups. Patients included in the ACD group underwent fewer reoperations in the first 3 months after surgery. Nevertheless, longer operation time, higher amount of blood loss, and risk of nerve root lesion during device implantation should be considered additional risks in patients undergoing ACD implantation after MLD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Annular closure device; Disc herniation; Intraoperative findings

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33070235     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-020-04612-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  28 in total

1.  Reoperation for recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a study over a 20-year period in a Japanese population.

Authors:  Toshimi Aizawa; Hiroshi Ozawa; Takashi Kusakabe; Takeshi Nakamura; Akira Sekiguchi; Atsushi Takahashi; Tatsuro Sasaji; Shigeyuki Tokunaga; Tomonori Chiba; Naoki Morozumi; Yutaka Koizumi; Eiji Itoi
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 1.601

2.  The treatment of lumbar disc herniation: simple fragment excision versus disc space curettage.

Authors:  R A Balderston; G G Gilyard; A A Jones; S W Wiesel; D M Spengler; S J Bigos; R H Rothman
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1991-03

3.  Lumbar microdiscectomy versus sequesterectomy/free fragmentectomy: a long-term (>2 y) retrospective study of the clinical outcome.

Authors:  Bahram Fakouri; Vishal Patel; Edward Bayley; Shreya Srinivas
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2011-02

4.  Incidence of postoperative symptomatic epidural hematoma in spinal decompression surgery.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Aono; Tetsuo Ohwada; Noboru Hosono; Hidekazu Tobimatsu; Kenta Ariga; Takeshi Fuji; Motoki Iwasaki
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2011-05-06

5.  A meta-analysis of endoscopic discectomy versus open discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disk herniation.

Authors:  Lin Cong; Yue Zhu; Guanjun Tu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Tubular diskectomy vs conventional microdiskectomy for the treatment of lumbar disk herniation: 2-year results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mark P Arts; Ronald Brand; M Elske van den Akker; Bart W Koes; Ronald H M A Bartels; W F Tan; Wilco C Peul
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Comparison of the lumbar disc herniation patients randomized in SPORT to 6,846 discectomy patients from NSQIP: demographics, perioperative variables, and complications correlate well.

Authors:  Nicholas S Golinvaux; Daniel D Bohl; Bryce A Basques; Alem Yacob; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  The high-risk discectomy patient: prevention of reherniation in patients with large anular defects using an anular closure device.

Authors:  Gerrit J Bouma; Martin Barth; Darko Ledic; Milorad Vilendecic
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection After Spinal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Qi Fei; Jinjun Li; JiSheng Lin; Dong Li; BingQiang Wang; Hai Meng; Qi Wang; Nan Su; Yong Yang
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 2.104

10.  Postoperative spinal epidural hematoma (SEH): incidence, risk factors, onset, and management.

Authors:  Amir R Amiri; Ioannis P Fouyas; Suzie Cro; Adrian T H Casey
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  2 in total

1.  The effect of low preoperative platelet count on adverse outcomes following lumbar microdiscectomy.

Authors:  Stephan Aynaszyan; Idorenyin F Udoeyo; Edward M DelSole
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2022-04-01

2.  Effectiveness of an Annular Closure Device to Prevent Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Secondary Analysis With 5 Years of Follow-up.

Authors:  Claudius Thomé; Adisa Kuršumovic; Peter Douglas Klassen; Gerrit J Bouma; Richard Bostelmann; Frederic Martens; Martin Barth; Mark Arts; Larry E Miller; Peter Vajkoczy; Robert Hes; Sandro Eustacchio; Dharmin Nanda; Hans-Peter Köhler; Christopher Brenke; Charlotte Flüh; Erik Van de Kelft; Richard Assaker; Jenny C Kienzler; Javier Fandino
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-12-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.